Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm very low birth weight infants admitted to an Italian tertiary center over an 11-year period

Abstract

Preterm very low birth weight infants (VLBWi) are known to be at greater risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Identifying early factors associated with outcome is essential in order to refer patients for early intervention. Few studies have investigated neurodevelopmental outcome in Italian VLBWi. The aim of our longitudinal study is to describe neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months of corrected age in an eleven-year cohort of 502 Italian preterm VLBWi and to identify associations with outcome. At 24 months, Griffiths’ Mental Developmental Scales were administered. Neurodevelopmental outcome was classified as: normal, minor sequelae (minor neurological signs, General Quotient between 76 and 87), major sequelae (cerebral palsy; General Quotient ≤ 75; severe sensory impairment). 75.3% showed a normal outcome, 13.9% minor sequelae and 10.8% major sequelae (3.8% cerebral palsy). Male gender, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, abnormal neonatal neurological assessment and severe brain ultrasound abnormalities were independently associated with poor outcome on multivariate ordered logistic regression. Rates of major sequelae are in line with international studies, as is the prevalence of developmental delay over cerebral palsy. Analysis of perinatal complications and the combination of close cUS monitoring and neurological assessment are still essential for early identification of infants with adverse outcome.

Introduction

Preterm birth is a significant cause of infant and child mortality and morbidity. An estimated 11.1% of all births worldwide occur prematurely, with Europe recording the lowest rate (6.2%)1. In 2008 the annual birth number in Italy was of approximately 552,000 and preterm very low birth weight infants (VLBWi) account for 1% of this total2. In 2019 the annual birth number has decreased to 420.000 with the same percentage of VLBWi3.

Modern neonatal intensive care techniques have contributed to increased survival of infants born at the limit of viability4,5. A recent study of a large international cohort of very preterm infants born between 2007 and 2015 in 11 high-income countries showed that in the same period rates of mortality and of major comorbidities decreased in most of them, including Italy6.

Approximately 5–10% of all VLBWi present major motor deficits (cerebral palsy, CP), while 25–50% have cognitive, behavioral and/or attention disabilities. The impact of these deficits and disabilities can be huge, both on the individuals and families concerned, and on public health care resources, especially given the life-long nature of sequelae7.

The above considerations explain the growing importance of evaluating short- and long-term developmental outcome in premature infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

To date, there are few Italian studies on neurodevelopmental outcome in large VLBWi cohorts: several recent papers have examined preterm infants’ neurodevelopment during early life, but the data are scarce, non-homogeneous, not comparable, and even seemingly contradictory. In a previous neurodevelopmental follow-up study in a sample of VLBWi born between 2005 and 2007 evaluated at 24 months of corrected age (CA) using Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS-R), we found that 16% had neurological sequelae (11% minor and 5% major). Preterm premature rupture of the membranes, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), late-onset sepsis, postnatal steroid therapy and male gender were the most significant risk factors for adverse outcome8,9. Ionio et al.10 assessed cognitive and linguistic performance using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID-III) in a population of healthy Italian preterm infants (mean gestational age 31.15 weeks) at 24 and 36 months of CA. They did not classify infants according to the neurodevelopmental outcome, but they highlighted significantly different scores between preterm and term infants at both 24 and 36 months. Moreover they found that lower gestational age, lower birthweight, and more days spent in hospital correlated with a larger gap between corrected and chronological scores at 24 months10. In a longitudinal study conducted in a large sample of monolingual preterm VLBWi without major cerebral damage, Sansavini et al.11 found that 20% showed delay in word production at 24 months of corrected age (CA), but cognitive profile was not investigated. They found that male gender, BPD and low maternal educational level increased the risk of language delay at 24 months11. The most recent Italian paper, published in 2020 by the Neuroprem working group, investigated neurodevelopmental outcome of 153 VLBWi at 2 years of age using GMDS-R or BSID III and neuro-functional evaluation according to the International Classification of Disability and Health (ICF-CY). In this regional prospective cohort study, the rate of severe functional disability was 8.5%, and the rate of CP was 4.5%. Associations with perinatal risk factors were not evaluated12.

A large body of follow-up data from a single Italian NICU (currently lacking) could constitute a valuable tool for assessing the quality of neonatal care provided, for establishing appropriate interventions and pursuing outcome improvements, and for making comparisons with other national and international NICUs.

The present longitudinal study aims to describe neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months of corrected age (CA) in a large cohort of VLBWi admitted to a single Italian tertiary NICU, and to look for correlations between obstetric, perinatal and postnatal variables and short-term neurodevelopmental outcome.

Materials and methods

A longitudinal study was performed at the NICU of the “Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo” hospital in Pavia, Italy, in collaboration with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the same hospital and the Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit at the IRCCS C. Mondino Foundation. All consecutive inborn and outborn VLBWi (weight ≤ 1500 g), admitted to the abovementioned NICU within 6 h of birth between January 1st 2005 and December 31st 2015, were eligible for inclusion in the present study. All were treated in accordance with state-of-the-art international, national and in-house guidelines13. All infants born at > 23 weeks GA received resuscitation in the delivery room and were subsequently transferred to the NICU. Infants born at extremely low gestational ages (< 23 weeks GA) showing strong respiratory effort and vital signs were transferred to the NICU after resuscitation, for subsequent palliative or full intensive care. Exclusion criteria were: major congenital malformations, diagnosis of a genetic disorder or congenital infection. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo. The parents of all the neonates signed the Institutional Informed Consent for the anonymous use of their children’s clinical data for scientific purposes.

Data collection

Obstetric, perinatal and neonatal data were recorded and defined according to the Vermont Oxford Network database criteria for VLBWi14. For each newborn, the clinical risk index for babies (CRIB) score was calculated; the CRIB is a tool designed to quantify clinical severity on the basis of six variables evaluated during the first 12 h of life: birth weight (BW), gestational age (GA), minimum and maximum fraction of inspired oxygen to maintain a saturation of between 88 and 95%, worst base excess, presence of congenital abnormalities15.

Ultrasound scan

In accordance with the protocol followed at our NICU, cerebral ultrasound (cUS), with serial examinations, was performed in all the preterm infants (from 2005 using an Acuson Sequoia 512; and from January 2014 using an Arietta V70)16. When detected, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) was classified according to Papile et al., periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) according to de Vries et al., and ventricular dilatation (VD) according to Ment et al.17,18,19. In accordance with the Rademaker classification, cUS scans performed at 40 weeks of post menstrual age (PMA) were classified as “normal” when they revealed minor or no abnormalities, “slightly abnormal” in the presence of grade I/II IVH, grade I PVL, germinal layer necrosis, or a combination of these features, or isolated VD, and “severely abnormal” in the presence of grade III/IV IVH, cystic grade II/III PVL, thalamic lesions, focal infarction, or post-hemorrhagic VD needing surgical intervention20.

Neurological and neurodevelopmental assessment and follow up

A child neuropsychiatrist, unaware of the cUS findings, examined each subject at 38–42 weeks of PMA; neonatal neurological assessments were classified as “normal” or “abnormal” in the absence or presence of any pathological neurological sign, respectively21. Each infant underwent neurodevelopmental assessment every three months during the first year of life, and every 6 months in the second year9,22. The Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS)23, were used to obtain each child’s General Quotient (GQ) at 24 months of CA. In addition, ophthalmological and audiometric examinations were performed periodically to exclude specific sensory abnormalities9.

At 24 months of CA, infants were classified into three categories according to their neurodevelopmental outcome: “normal” if they had a normal neurological assessment and a GQ ≥ 88; “minor sequelae” if they showed tone and reflex abnormalities or asymmetry without functional deficits, or at least one sign from the triad described by Amiel-Tison and Gosselin, GQ between 76 and 87, squint and refractive errors, mild hypoacusia; and “major sequelae” if they presented disabling or non-disabling CP, a GQ ≤ 75, sensorineural hearing loss requiring active intervention, or severe central or peripheral visual impairment9. CP diagnosis was performed by a trained neuropsychiatrist and defined and classified according to Rosenbaum et al. (2007)24.

Statistical analysis

The continuous variables were reported as mean and standard deviation if normally distributed, and as median and interquartile range (IQR: 25th–75th percentile) if not normally distributed. The categorical variables were expressed as counts and percentages. The associations between categorical variables were studied with the Pearson’s χ2 test or with the Fisher’s exact test. For continuous variables, comparisons between two groups were performed with the Student’s t test or the analogous non parametrical test of Mann–Whitney, while for comparisons among more than two groups the ANOVA test or the analogous non parametrical test of Kruskal–Wallis were used. In order to study the association between risk factors and severity of neurological sequelae (normal, minor, major), univariate ordered logistic regression models were performed. The risk factors showing a p value < 0.2 on univariate analysis and no collinearity were included as regressors in a multivariate ordered logistic model. Appropriate tests for checking the ordered logistic regression assumptions (proportional odds assumption/parallel regression assumption) were performed; post hoc tests for fitting of the model were used, and the predicted values were graphically represented. Results were reported as odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval. The significance level was set at alpha 0.05 (statistical significance for p values < 0.05). The statistical analysis was performed using STATA statistical software, version 14 or later (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

Study population

During the study period, 739 VLBWi were admitted to the NICU of the “Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo” hospital and 728 eligible VLBWi, 647 inborn and 81 outborn infants, were included in the study. Of these, 101 (13.8%) died in the NICU. Both GA at birth and BW were significantly lower in the deceased group compared with the survivors with six out of eight infants with gestational age < 23 weeks dying in the first hours or within the first 10 days of life, and only two infants surviving to discharge (more details are shown in Supplementary Table 1). None of the infants died after discharge from the NICU. Eleven subjects (1.5%) were excluded from the present analysis on the basis of the exclusion criteria, while 125 infants (19.9%) were lost to follow up. No differences in perinatal medical data, cUS findings or neurological assessment at 40 weeks of PMA were found between the study group and the subjects lost to follow up (Supplementary Table 2). In total, 502 infants (80.1%) completed the follow-up evaluation and constitute the study group (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Participant flow diagram.

The main sociodemographic, obstetric and neonatal characteristics of the study group are reported in Table 1, column 2. The cUS findings by neurological assessment at 40 weeks of PMA are shown in Supplementary Table 3.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the entire study sample and according to neurodevelopmental outcome.

Neurodevelopmental outcome

Neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months of CA was classified as normal in 378 children (75.3%), while the remaining 124 (24.7%) presented neurological sequelae: classified as minor in 69 cases (13.9%) and major in 55 (10.8%) (Table 2). In the “major sequelae” group, 19 infants (3.8% of the whole sample) had CP: 9 of them had a non-disabling form and could walk unassisted, and 7 had a GQ > 75. Severe developmental delay was observed in 35 infants (7% of the whole sample).

Table 2 Neurodevelopmental outcome of the total study population (n = 502) at 24 months of CA.

The GMDS findings are reported in Fig. 2. The median score on the Hearing-Speech subscale was significantly lower than the median scores recorded on all the other subscales (p < 0.001). This statistical significance persisted after restricting the analysis to the children with normal GQ (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Developmental profile of the entire study sample and according to neurodevelopmental outcome categories at 24 months of CA. 95% CI. * = p < 0.001 among Hearing-Speech Scale and all other Scales in all groups of patients.

Correlations between sociodemographic, obstetric and neonatal variables and outcome at 24 months of CA

Table 1 shows the sociodemographic, obstetric and neonatal variables divided by neurodevelopmental outcome and for each variable the corresponding p value for the statistical significance of the comparison between the three groups. Prenatal magnesium sulphate administration was introduced in routine prenatal care in 2008. We performed the univariate analysis, testing all the variables for association with neurodevelopmental outcome. Table 3 reports the results, in terms of OR and p value, of respectively the univariate and the multivariate analysis, with neurodevelopmental sequelae as outcome. The multivariate model was performed by including the variables for which no collinearity was reported. All the variables included in the multivariate model proved to be significantly associated with the outcome, even if, when adjusting for the other predictors included in the model, for each variable the significance level tended to be lower than in the univariate model. In the multivariate model, the highest OR was reported for severely abnormal cUS finding (OR 6.1; p value < 0.001); abnormal neurological assessment at 40 weeks of PMA showed a OR equal to 2.1 (p value 0.002). The presence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia reported an OR of 1.7 and the male gender an OR of 1.5, both statistically significant (respectively p = 0.026 and p = 0.043).

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for adverse neurodevelopmental outcome.

Discussion

We have here reported the neurodevelopmental follow-up data recorded in a cohort of VLBWi consecutively admitted at birth to a tertiary Italian NICU over a recent 11-year period (2005 to 2015).

The single-center design of the study, despite its inherent limitations, ensured highly homogeneous standards of care and methodological consistency of data collection throughout. Both inborn and outborn patients were included in the study. Although poorly measurable, possible between-hospital differences in prenatal care and delivery room resuscitation protocols may have influenced the outcomes; however, outborn infants accounted for only 7.5% of the whole study population, and no statistically significant differences were found between inborn and outborn patients.

One hundred and one infants died in the NICU and were excluded from the analysis. They had a lower mean GA at birth and a lower mean BW compared with the survivors, suggesting a potentially greater burden of brain damage in the non survivors. In terms of mortality, higher at lower GAs25, and of major complications of prematurity, our study cohort is comparable to cohorts reported in national and international databases14.

The neurodevelopmental outcome analysis showed that 10.8% of the sample presented major neurological sequelae at 24 months of CA, with CP affecting 3.8%. Moreover, approximately half of the CP cases had a non-disabling form and could walk unassisted, and a considerable proportion of them showed satisfactory cognitive development. These findings, too, are in line with those of other authors25. The EPIPAGE study reported rates of survival without neurodevelopmental impairment at 2 years of corrected age of 48.5%, 90.0%, and 97.5% for infants born at 22–26, 27–31, and 32–34 weeks of gestational age respectively. The overall rate of CP at 24–26, 27–31, and 32–34 weeks' gestation was 6.9%, 4.3% and 1.0% respectively26. In a cohort of consecutive extremely preterm infants born before 27 weeks of gestation in Sweden between 2004 and 2007 and evaluated at 30 months of corrected age 42% children had no disability, 31% had mild disability, 16% had moderate disability, and 11% had severe disability. CP was present in 7%. Moderate or severe overall disability decreased with gestational age at birth27. The Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group assessed neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months of corrected age of infants born at gestational age 22–27 weeks in the state of Victoria in 1991 and 2005 and showed a rate of CP of 11% and 9.8% respectively28. The Epicure Study identified higher rates of CP (19%) at 30 months of corrected age, but they included preterm born ≤ 25 weeks gestation in the United Kingdom and Ireland in 199529. This high percentage could be explained by the lower gestational age of the sample and the time of enrolment prior to 2000s. Differences in neurodevelopmental outcome rates, particularly regarding CP, could be related also on the different inclusion criteria between studies based on gestational age or on birthweight. When we started the recruitment, we chose birthweight according to VON criteria14. The mean gestational age of our cohort is of 29 weeks with only 10.5% SGA infants born > 32 weeks, nevertheless the presence of gestational age > 32 weeks could have influenced the outcome.

Consistent with the general trend shown by preterm infants born in the 2000s7, the major sequelae of preterm birth most frequently consisted of global developmental delay, rather than CP.

The impaired GQ scores recorded in our sample undoubtedly confirm the fragility of the cognitive development process in this population and the presence of emotional dysregulation30.

Our patients’ data showed a peculiar disharmonic neurodevelopmental profile at 24 months of CA, characterized by statistically significant impairment in the language domain, evident even in subjects with normal GQ9. Children born preterm are known to be at increased risk of long-term language impairments31, which can appear from early ages32, and last until school age or adolescence33. Our results confirm the findings from several previous studies suggesting that language impairment, detectable as early as 24 months of CA, is independent of cognitive disability34. The adverse neurodevelopmental outcome and peculiar disharmonic profile detected in our sample may be explained by an interplay of risk factors. According to the literature, there are several factors suggested to contribute to adverse language outcomes: environmental (a long NICU stay with non-optimal infant-caregiver interactions and underexposure to meaningful sensory stimuli), social (low maternal education level), biological (male gender), medical (BPD) and structural (altered brain maturation, atypical functional organization, delayed neural language lateralization and structural changes)35,36.

In brief, whereas global developmental delay, as expressed by a GQ ≤ 75, emerged as the most frequent major sequela, CP was less frequent, and less severe, than reported in the past, and affected subjects often showed satisfactory cognitive development. The cognitive profile of our very preterm infants was also characterized by significantly impaired language performance, even in the group without sequelae.

A further aim of our study was to identify potential associations with neurodevelopmental outcome in infants born in 2005 and later. In the present Italian study cohort, multivariate analysis identified male gender, BPD, cUS abnormalities and neurological assessment at 40 weeks of PMA as factors associated with neurodevelopment at 24 months of CA, in line with the findings of previous studies conducted in other cohorts.

In our cohort, social demographics did not affect neurodevelopmental outcome. This finding could be explained by the data availability because accurate social demographics were collected only for inborn infants. Moreover, the literature suggests that the influence of social demographics particularly affects cognitive domain and, possibly, 24 months of CA is too early to detect specific cognitive deficits and related risk factors37.

Magnesium sulphate was introduced as a prenatal treatment only in 2008 and was thus administered to only a minor proportion of infants. Our data, although not reaching statistical significance probably due to the low number of treated patients, appear to be consistent with previous observations showing association between magnesium sulphate administration and improved neurodevelopmental outcomes38,39.

Sex differences in preterm infants are known to influence both mortality and morbidity40,41. In particular, systematic reviews have shown that male gender per se is a prognostic factor for poorer cognitive development and language skills in early infancy (the “male disadvantage”), but not for CP in cohorts of children born very preterm42. The exact reason for this male vulnerability is still unclear; some authors have considered sex hormones and differences in sex chromosome gene expression as possible factors42, and others have explored a possible role of sex differences in microglia number, morphology and function in the onset and modulation of inflammation and in responses to pre and perinatal insults43. Moreover, neurological outcome appears to be more sensitive to suboptimal nutrition in male than in female preterm infants44. Overall, compared with females, male infants born very preterm appear to show a less efficient coping mechanism against stress factors, with consequences on brain development.

BPD is associated with a worse neurodevelopmental outcome, mostly motor dysfunction and poorer cognitive, language and neurosensory function43. In previous studies, motor and neurosensory and cognitive impairment in infants with BPD has been linked to delayed structural brain maturation45,46,47, and white matter microstructural abnormalities in the corpus callosum, corticospinal tract and superior cerebellar peduncle48. In our study, postnatal steroids were not associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. Other studies identified postnatal steroids as independent predictors of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes49, but differences in timing and dosage of postnatal steroid administration and years of patients’ enrolment may account for differences across studies.

The multivariate analysis approach has previously identified the presence of lesions on cUS as strongly associated to neurodevelopmental outcome7. cUS remains the standard bedside examination in the NICU, and the most widely used technique for routine imaging, to detect IVH, monitor its progression, and follow up white matter injury and PVL evolution, especially in high-risk groups such as VLBWi50. In spite of its limits in identifying certain types of brain damage, such as diffuse white matter abnormalities and micro-cerebellar hemorrhages, and several disadvantages of the technique, such as interobserver and machine and probe type variability51, cUS is crucial for defining the neurodevelopmental prognosis, and thus for identifying infants needing to be referred for specialized follow-up and early intervention programs52,53. The strong association of brain lesions on cUS with the neurodevelopmental outcome confirmed in our study is possibly explained also by the close monitoring of patients during the first 4 weeks of life in our NICU, when cUS is routinely performed, as well as by the subsequent serial cUS monitoring, which is continued, during hospitalization, until patients reach 36 weeks of PMA. As suggested in the literature54, further follow-up evaluations are performed at 1–2 months of CA, or later, in order to better define the brain lesions, especially PVL.

Our results further confirm9, the current validity of traditional neurological assessment at term-equivalent age in preterm infants as significantly associated to the neurodevelopmental outcome: if pathological it is suggestive of major sequelae in the long term. Nevertheless, there remains a group of VLBWi with clear cognitive impairment that is not identified early by abnormal neurological assessment and/or cUs (i.e., in our cohort, 61% of the children with major sequelae did not present a severely abnormal cUS and 39% had a normal neurological assessment at term-equivalent age). In the context of “encephalopathy of prematurity”, advanced neuroimaging has already been applied to investigate the effects of dysmaturational disturbances of brain development55, with the aim of identifying, early on, children at greater risk of developing cognitive impairment56,57,58. Further studies are needed to find specific pre-perinatal factors associated to cognitive impairment that might be readily available to clinicians.

Finally, we underline that while the most severe motor sequelae and developmental delays can be diagnosed at 24 months, it is necessary to wait at least until school age in order to detect impairments (cognitive, behavioral and emotional) that may appear later. In this regard, our long-term follow-up is ongoing and will allow us to better highlight the characteristics of these preterm infants’ neurodevelopment and their resulting quality of life.

Strengths and limitations

Our study is one of the few investigating the short-term neurodevelopmental outcome of VLBWi born in the 2000s in Italy12.

Overall, 80% of all the enrolled participants completed the follow up, a cut-off used to define high-quality randomized trials59, and no statistically significant differences in pre-perinatal characteristics were observed between the study group and the children lost to follow up.

The single-center design of the study meant that highly homogeneous standards of care were applied in all the enrolled participants throughout the study period and ensured methodological consistency of data collection during the follow up. On the other hand, maintaining the same methodology for a follow-up period of 10 years made our protocol less sensitive in identifying problems that are nowadays detected more frequently (for example autism spectrum disorders).

We are aware that exploration of general movements (GMs), if included in the neurological assessment performed at term-equivalent age, might have increased its prognostic value60,61. All the examiners involved in the present study are trained in GMs assessment, but due to objective difficulties in systematically obtaining video recordings and evaluating GMs in routine clinical practice, data on GMs trajectories are available only for a subgroup of our patients.

Moreover, the study design would be improved with a term-control reference group to compare some perinatal characteristics as well as term neurological assessments and 2-years outcome.

Conclusion

Our study showed that, in a population of VLBWi born in Italy in the period 2005–2015, male gender, BPD, cUS monitoring and neurological examination at 40 weeks of PMA are strongly associated with the subsequent neurodevelopmental outcome. Furthermore, a combination of close cUS monitoring and neurological examination, in addition to evaluation of perinatal variables, proved essential for identifying infants needing to be referred for specific early intervention programs. Our data on neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months of CA showed a rate of neurological impairment comparable to that reported in recent epidemiological literature from other countries.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Vogel, J. P. et al. The global epidemiology of preterm birth. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 52, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.04.003 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cavallo, M. C. et al. Cost of care and social consequences of very low birth weight infants without premature-related morbidities in Italy. Ital. J. Pediatr. 41, 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-015-0165-z (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica—Istat. Report natalità e fecondità della popolazione residente, anno 2019. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/251937. Accessed March 11, 2021.

  4. Rysavy, M. A. et al. Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants [published correction appears in N Engl J Med.;372(25), 2469]. N. Engl. J. Med. 372(19), 1801–1811. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1410689 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Stoll, B. J. et al. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993–2012. JAMA 314(10), 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10244 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lui, K. et al. Trends in outcomes for neonates born very preterm and very low birth weight in 11 high-income countries. J. Pediatr. 215, 32-40.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.08.020 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Volpe, J. J. Brain injury in premature infants: A complex amalgam of destructive and developmental disturbances. Lancet Neurol. 8(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70294-1 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Orcesi, S. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm very low birth weight infants born from 2005 to 2007. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 16(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.05.006 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Olivieri, I. et al. Outcome of extremely low birth weight infants: What’s new in the third millennium? Neuropsychological profiles at 4 years. Early Hum. Dev. 88(4), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.08.012 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ionio, C. et al. Paths of cognitive and language development in healthy preterm infants. Infant Behav. Dev. 44, 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.07.004 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sansavini, A. et al. Longitudinal trajectories of gestural and linguistic abilities in very preterm infants in the second year of life. Neuropsychologia 49(13), 3677–3688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.023 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lugli, L. et al. Neuroprem: The Neuro-developmental outcome of very low birth weight infants in an Italian region. Ital. J. Pediatr. 46(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-0787-7 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: Pediatric basic life support. Pediatrics 117(5), e989–e1004. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-0219 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vermont Oxford Network. Vermont Oxford Network Database Manual of Operations: Release 6.0 (Vermont Oxford Network, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gagliardi, L. et al. Assessing mortality risk in very low birthweight infants: A comparison of CRIB, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 89(5), F419–F422. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2003.031286 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Leijser, L. M., de Vries, L. S. & Cowan, F. M. Using cerebral ultrasound effectively in the newborn infant. Early Hum. Dev. 82(12), 827–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.09.018 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Papile, L. A., Burstein, J., Burstein, R. & Koffler, H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: A study of infants with birth weights less than 1500 g. J. Pediatr. 92(4), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(78)80282-0 (1978).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De Vries, L. S., Van Haastert, I. L., Rademaker, K. J., Koopman, C. & Groenendaal, F. Ultrasound abnormalities preceding cerebral palsy in high-risk preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 144(6), 815–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.03.034 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ment, L. R. et al. The etiology and outcome of cerebral ventriculomegaly at term in very low birth weight preterm infants. Pediatrics 104(2 Pt 1), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.104.2.243 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rademaker, K. J. et al. Neonatal cranial ultrasound versus MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome at school age in children born preterm. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 90(6), F489–F493. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.073908 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Amiel-Tison, C. Update of the Amiel–Tison neurologic assessment for the term neonate or at 40 weeks corrected age. Pediatr. Neurol. 27(3), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-8994(02)00436-8 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gosselin, J. & Amiel-Tison, C. Neurological Assessment from Birth to 6 Years 2nd edn. (Editions du CHU Sainte-Justine, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Griffiths, R. The Ability of Young Children: A Comprehensive System of Mental Measurement for the First 8 years of Life-Child (Developmental Research, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenbaum, P. et al. A report: The definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. Suppl. 109, 8–14 (2007). Erratum in: Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 49(6), 480 (2007).

  25. Sellier, E., Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy Network, et al. Decreasing prevalence in cerebral palsy: A multi-site European population-based study, 1980 to 2003. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 58(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12865 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pierrat, V., EPIPAGE-2 Writing Group, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years for preterm children born at 22 to 34 weeks' gestation in France in 2011: EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. BMJ 358, j3448. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3448 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Serenius, F., EXPRESS Group, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants at 2.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA 309(17), 1810–1820. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.3786 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Doyle, L. W., Roberts, G., Anderson, P. J. & Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Outcomes at age 2 years of infants < 28 weeks’ gestational age born in Victoria in 2005. J. Pediatr. 156(1), 49-53.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.07.013 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wood, N. S., EPICure Study Group, et al. The EPICure study: Associations and antecedents of neurological and developmental disability at 30 months of age following extremely preterm birth. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 90(2), F134–F140. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2004.052407 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Shah, P. E. et al. The paradox of prematurity: The behavioral vulnerability of late preterm infants and the cognitive susceptibility of very preterm infants at 36 months post-term. Infant Behav. Dev. 36(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.11.003 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Barnes-Davis, M. E. et al. Extremely preterm children exhibit altered cortical thickness in language areas. Sci. Rep. 10, 10824. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67662-7 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Barre, N. et al. Language abilities in children who were very preterm and/or very low birth weight: A meta-analysis. J. Pediatr. 158(5), 766–774.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.10.032 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nguyen, T. N. et al. Language trajectories of children born very preterm and full term from early to late childhood. J. Pediatr. 202, 86–91.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.06.036 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. van Noort-van der Spek, I. L., Franken, M. C. & Weisglas-Kuperus, N. Language functions in preterm-born children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics 129(4), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1728 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vandormael, C. et al. Language in preterm born children: Atypical development and effects of early interventions on neuroplasticity. Neural Plast. 25(2019), 6873270. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6873270 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Burnett, A. C., Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group, et al. Exploring the “Preterm Behavioral Phenotype” in children born extremely preterm. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 40(3), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000646 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Benavente-Fernández, I., Siddiqi, A. & Miller, S. P. Socioeconomic status and brain injury in children born preterm: Modifying neurodevelopmental outcome. Pediatr. Res. 87, 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-019-0646-7 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rouse, D. J. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 359(9), 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0801187 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Oddie, S., Tuffnell, D. J. & McGuire, W. Antenatal magnesium sulfate: Neuro-protection for preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 100(6), F553–F557. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307655 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Linsell, L. et al. Prognostic factors for poor cognitive development in children born very preterm or with very low birth weight: A systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 169(12), 1162–1172. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2175 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Shim, S. Y. et al. Gestational age-specific sex difference in mortality and morbidities of preterm infants: A nationwide study. Sci. Rep. 7, 6161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06490-8 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pinares-Garcia, P. et al. Sex: A significant risk factor for neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Sci. 8(8), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8080154 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hanamsagar, R. & Bilbo, S. D. Sex differences in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders: Focus on microglial function and neuroinflammation during development. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 160, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.09.039 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Macedo, I., Pereira-da-Silva, L., Brito, L. & Cardoso, M. Male sex is an independent risk factor for poor neurodevelopmental outcome at 20 months’ corrected age, in human milk-fed very preterm infants: A cohort study. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 17(3), eAO4607. https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4607 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Cheong, J. L. Y. & Doyle, L. W. An update on pulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcomes of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin. Perinatol. 42(7), 478–484. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2018.09.013 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Neubauer, V. et al. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia is associated with delayed structural brain maturation in preterm infants. Neonatology 107(3), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1159/000369199 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kline, J. E. et al. Retinopathy of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia are independent antecedents of cortical maturational abnormalities in very preterm infants. Sci. Rep. 9, 19679. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56298-x (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee, J. M. et al. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia is associated with altered brain volumes and white matter microstructure in preterm infants. Neonatology 116(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499487 (2019).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cheong, J. L. Y., Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group, et al. Changes in long-term prognosis with increasing postnatal survival and the occurrence of postnatal morbidities in extremely preterm infants offered intensive care: A prospective observational study. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2(12), 872–879 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30287-6. Erratum in: Lancet Child. Adolesc. Health 3(1), e1 (2019).

  50. Dorner, R. A. et al. Preterm neuroimaging and neurodevelopmental outcome: A focus on intraventricular hemorrhage, post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus, and associated brain injury. J. Perinatol. 38(11), 1431–1443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0209-5 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ibrahim, J., Mir, I. & Chalak, L. Brain imaging in preterm infants < 32 weeks gestation: A clinical review and algorithm for the use of cranial ultrasound and qualitative brain MRI. Pediatr. Res. 84(6), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0194-6 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Guillot, M., Chau, V. & Lemyre, B. Routine imaging of the preterm neonatal brain. Paediatr. Child Health 25(4), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxaa033 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Skovgaard, A. L. & Zachariassen, G. Cranial ultrasound findings in preterm infants predict the development of cerebral palsy. Dan. Med. J. 64(2), A5330 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sarkar, S., Generic Database Subcommittee of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, et al. Screening cranial imaging at multiple time points improves cystic periventricular leukomalacia detection. Am. J. Perinatol. 32(10), 973–979. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1545666 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Volpe, J. J. Dysmaturation of premature brain: Importance, cellular mechanisms, and potential interventions. Pediatr. Neurol. 95, 42–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.02.016 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Parikh, N. A. Advanced neuroimaging and its role in predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes in very preterm infants. Semin. Perinatol. 40(8), 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.005 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Parikh, N. A. et al. Novel diffuse white matter abnormality biomarker at term-equivalent age enhances prediction of long-term motor development in very preterm children. Sci. Rep. 10, 15920 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Spittle, A. J., Morgan, C., Olsen, J. E., Novak, I. & Cheong, J. L. Y. Early diagnosis and treatment of cerebral palsy in children with a history of preterm birth. Clin. Perinatol. 45(3), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2018.05.011 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fewtrell, M. S. et al. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?. Arch. Dis. Child. 93(6), 458–461. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.127316 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Romeo, D. M. et al. Early neurologic assessment in preterm-infants: Integration of traditional neurologic examination and observation of general movements. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 12(3), 183–189 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Porro, M. et al. Early detection of general movements trajectories in very low birth weight infants. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 13290. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70003-3 (2020).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.L. conceptualized and designed the study, interpreted the data, drafted the manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. C.C. and C.P. interpreted the data, drafted and critically revised the manuscript. G.T. collected data, carried out the initial analysis, drafted the initial manuscript. A.B., G.P., I.O., R.L.P., D.T., A.D., G.A., S.S., C.N., B.G. collected data and review the manuscript. F.M. and C.T. designed the data collection instruments and carried out statistical analysis. A.S and M.S. critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. S.O. conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated and supervised data collection, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilla Caporali.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Longo, S., Caporali, C., Pisoni, C. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm very low birth weight infants admitted to an Italian tertiary center over an 11-year period. Sci Rep 11, 16316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95864-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95864-0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing