Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

High canopy cover of invasive Acer negundo L. affects ground vegetation taxonomic richness


We assessed the link between canopy cover degree and ground vegetation taxonomic richness under alien ash-leaved maple (Acer negundo) and other (native or alien) tree species. We investigated urban and suburban forests in the large city of Yekaterinburg, Russia. Forests were evaluated on two spatial scales. Through an inter-habitat comparison we recorded canopy cover and plant taxonomic richness among 13 sample plots of 20 × 20 m where A. negundo dominated and 13 plots where other tree species dominated. In an intra-habitat comparison, we recorded canopy cover and ground vegetation taxonomic richness among 800 sample plots measuring 1 m2 in the extended urbanised forest, which featured abundant alien (308 plots) and native trees (492 plots). We observed decreased taxonomic richness among vascular ground plant species by 40% (inter-habitat) and 20% (intra-habitat) in areas dominated by A. negundo compared to areas dominated by native tree and shrub species. An abundance of Anegundo was accompanied by increased canopy cover. We found a negative relationship between canopy cover and the number of understory herbaceous species. Thus, the interception of light and the restriction of its amount for other species is a main factor supporting the negative influence of A. negundo on native plant communities.


Ash-leaved maple (Acer negundo L.) is an invasive tree in the territory of Northern Eurasia that is currently colonising disturbed and semi-natural territories1,2,3,4A. negundo actively restores itself in the urbanised forests of the Middle Urals5,6, but the invasion of ash-leaved maple is dangerous for some types of plant communities7,8. In communities dominated by A. negundo, the diversity of native plants decreases7,9,10. Invasion of the European Acer platanoides L.11 and the Far Eastern Acer ginnala Maxim produce a similarly negative effect on the diversity of native plant communities in North America12.

The ash-leaved maple is not only an alien and invasive species but also a transformer species. Transforming species significantly change the conditions in the invaded ecosystems13. The impact of transformer species is realised by influences on the light regime of communities12,14,15,16, nutrient cycles12,17,18,19,20,21 and different components of the biota22,23,24,25,26,27. Not all alien species achieve high abundance in invaded communities. Therefore, not all alien species significantly affect local ecosystems. Most of the alien plants are present with a low abundance in limited types, as a rule, of highly anthropogenically transformed habitats and therefore are not considered as transformers or invasive, but as naturalized species. So, when studying the ecological characteristics of alien plants, the features of transformer species arouse more interest versus both native and alien, but not actively spreading, species.

Light is an essential factor determining the productivity28,29,30 and species composition of plant communities15,31,32. Competition and specialization in light use in forest communities are especially significant because woody plants exert a substantial environmental influence on all other organisms through shading.

Shading is often considered a valid mechanism of the invasive plant influence on native communities33,34,35. This hypothesis seems easy to understand but has no absolute experimental support. Sometimes, higher shading under the invasive plant canopies is not confirmed36,37, including under A. negundo8,38. However, more publications verify that invasive plants form a denser leaf canopy than native ones33,34,39,40, including A. negundo40. So, it can be hypothesized that the ash-leaved maple shades the soil surface more completely than trees of other species (Fig. 1a), implying that the canopy cover in thickets of A. negundo is denser than in thickets of other trees. However, at the same time, similarly dense canopy cover decreases the richness of ground cover in the same way regardless of the tree species forming the canopy.

Figure 1

Hypothetical mechanisms of the generation of reduced diversity of the ground cover throughout shading in communities with Acer negundo (pink circles) in comparison with other trees (green circles); rhombus—average rates.

In addition to the hypothesis about the strong shading of A. negundo, it is possible that even with the same canopy cover, the ash-leaved maple has a stronger effect on ground cover than other trees (Fig. 1b,c). This suggestion implies that the reduced richness of the ground cover under A. negundo is associated not only with shading but also with certain other mechanisms. The reasons for this are potentially very diverse and may include increased litter formation34, the different chemical composition of litter39 and soils38 as well as slower41 or accelerated38 litter decomposition. Furthermore, direct allelopathic effects of invasive plants on native plants are possible42,43,44,45,46,47, as is the effect of invasive plants on soil organisms22,23.

We emphasise the need for further research, including in new geographic regions, to identify the mechanisms of A. negundo invasion and the impact of this invasion on native plant communities. In this study, we conducted two field investigations to estimate the impacts of ash-leaved maple invasion on native plant communities.

In this study, we focused on testing the hypothesis of whether the associated effects of the canopy cover of Anegundo can explain its effect on living ground vegetation, namely shrubs and herbs. We hypothesized that the main direction of the relationship between canopy cover and ground cover diversity is negative; that is, with an increase in canopy cover, the number of ground cover species decreases. This paper analyses whether the ability of A. negundo to create a dense canopy explains its influence on ground cover.

We tested three hypotheses. Firstly, we supposed, that canopy cover in stands dominated by A. negundo is higher than canopy cover in stands dominated by other species; Secondly, we surmised that the species richness of ground cover plants is lower in stands dominated by A. negundo. Finally, we hypothesized, that species richness of ground cover plants exhibits a negative association with increasing canopy cover that is similar for each invasive A. negundo, alien species, and native species.

In most studies of the ecological features of alien plants, a pairwise comparison of sample plots selected for the presence/absence or dominance/non-dominance of invasive plants located in extended communities and habitats perform9,10,36,48,49. However, while using such an experimental design, it is difficult to prove that the established characteristics of the invasive communities are due to the influence of alien plants and not to the original properties of the habitats. To reduce this ambiguity, we used two comparison experimental designs: inter-habitat and intra-habitat comparison.


Canopy cover

In both the inter-habitat and intra-habitat comparisons, higher canopy cover was observed for A. negundo in comparison with other species of woody plants in urban pine forests.

Inter-habitat comparison

We observed a slightly higher canopy cover in communities dominated by the ash-leaved maple compared to communities with other woody dominants. In ANOVA, with fixed effects "plot type" and "year" and a random effect "site", the differences between plots dominated by invasive A. negundo (An +) and dominated by other tree species (An −) in canopy cover were significant (Fplot type(1; 54) = 11.09; P = 0.0016), as well as the effect of the year of observation (Fyear(2; 54) = 3.55; P = 0.0356).The interaction of factors with fixed effects was insignificant (Fplot type × year(2; 54) = 0.33; P = 0.7186). The absolute differences in the mean values of canopy cover between the plots were small (Fig. 2): 90 ± 1% in the An+ plots and 86 ± 1% in the An− plots.

Figure 2

Average rates (± SE, ± 95CI) of canopy cover in communities dominated by Acer negundo (An+ ; pink plots) and other tree species (An− ; green plots).

Intra-habitat comparison

Using Moran's I autocorrelation, similar canopy cover values clustered at distances of 10–15 m. Consequently, the heterogeneity of canopy cover distribution covered 2–4 neighboring plots. We found a higher canopy cover in areas dominated by Anegundo compared to areas with other tree dominants. In the one-way ANOVA, the differences in canopy cover between the plots dominated by native and alien tree species versus A. negundo were significant (Fplot type(2; 797) = 4.21; P = 0.0151). The absolute differences in the mean values of canopy cover between the options were small (Fig. 3): areas with native dominants showed 66 ± 1%, with A. negundo 70 ± 1% and with other alien dominants 70 ± 2%. The conclusion about a significant difference in the canopy cover of different tree dominants does not change when regarding the connectivity of points, using ANOVA with mixed effects: with a block size of 5 × 5 m P < 0.0001; with a block size of 10 × 10 m P = 0.0100; with a block size of 20 × 20 m P = 0.0016.

Figure 3

Average rates (± SE, ± 95CI) of canopy cover in areas dominated by native (green plots), alien, excluding Acer negundo (white plots) species and individually—Acer negundo (pink plots).

We found that native and alien woody species resulted in heterogeneous canopy cover (Fig. 4). Some alien species, such as Populus balsamifera, had thin canopies, while some native species, such as Prunus padus and Sorbus aucuparia, had dense canopies. Moreover, among the alien species, the canopies of A. negundo were not the densest. Some alien woody plants (namely Ulmus laevis, Acer tataricum, and Malus baccata) had higher average canopy cover than A. negundo.

Figure 4

Average rates (± SE, ± 95CI) of canopy cover of different species of native (green plots) and alien (whitr and pink plots) tree species; rare species—the indication for a group of plots dominated by species rarely found in the studied site (Amelanchier spicata, Caragana arborescens, Cotoneaster lucidus, Crataegus sanguinea, Larix sibirica, Lonicera xylostella, Tilia cordata).

Richness of ground cover

In both inter-habitat and intra-habitat comparisons, we observed reduced species richness of the ground cover on plots with a tree layer formed by the ash-leaved maple.

Inter-habitat comparison

We observed reduced species richness of the ground cover in communities dominated by A. negundo compared to communities with other dominant trees. In ANOVA, with fixed effects "plot type" and "year" and a random effect "site", the differences between plots An+ and An− in the number of species per 400 m2 were significant (Fplot type(1; 54) = 63.69; P < 0.0001). The observation year (Fyear(2; 54) = 0.30; P = 0.7433) and the interaction between the factors of plot type and year of observation were not significant (Fplot type × year(2; 54) = 1.22; P = 0.3031). The absolute differences in average values of species richness of the ground cover between the plot types were significant (Fig. 5): 17.1 ± 1.7 species per 400 m2 in the An+ plots and 28.8 ± 1.7 species per 400 m2 in the An− plots.

Figure 5

Average rates (± SE, ± 95CI) of species' number per 400 m2 in communities dominated by Acer negundo (An+ ; pink plots) and other tree species (An− ; green plots).

Intra-habitat comparison

Using Moran's I autocorrelation, we found similar values of the ground cover richness clustered at distances of 5–10 m; heterogeneities covered up to 3 neighboring sites. We found that on the plots with alien woody dominants, including A. negundo, the number of ground cover species was lower in comparison to sites with native dominants (Fplot type(2; 797) = 28.58; P < 0.0001). We observed that absolute differences in average values of species richness between the plots with native woody dominants were 6.6 ± 0.1 species per m2; with alien woody dominants, excluding A. negundo,—5.2 ± 0.2 species per m2; and with A. negundo—5.3 ± 0.2 species per m2 (Fig. 6). The conclusion about the difference in the richness of ground cover species under the different tree dominant canopies remains highly significant (P < 0.0001) for any block size (5 × 5, 10 × 10, or 20 × 20 m) in an ANOVA with mixed effects regarding the spatial connectivity of plots.

Figure 6

Average number (± SE, ± 95CI) of observed ground cover species per m2 on plots dominated by native (green plots), alien, excluding Acer negundo (white plots) species, and individually—on plots dominated by Acer negundo (pink plots).

Plots were relatively homogeneous in terms of richness of the ground layer under the canopy regardless of whether the dominant species was native or alien (Fig. 7). Areas dominated by different species of alien plants did not differ in terms of ground richness. Among the native plants, two groups of species were distinguished according to the richness of ground cover communities: 1) underbrush shrubs under which the species richness of ground cover was not the highest—Prunus padus and Sorbus aucuparia, and 2) trees of the first and second tiers under which was observed the highest species richness of ground cover—Pinus sylvestris, Salix sp., Betula sp., Populus tremula.

Figure 7

Average number (± SE, ± 95CI) of observed ground cover species per m2 on plots under the canopies of different native (green plots) and alien (white and pink plots) tree species; rare species—the indication for a group of plots dominated by species rarely found in the studied site (Amelanchier spicata, Caragana arborescens, Cotoneaster lucidus, Crataegus sanguinea, Larix sibirica, Lonicera xylostella, Tilia cordata).

Relationship between canopy cover and species richness of ground cover

In both the inter-habitat and intra-habitat comparisons, a negative correlation was found between canopy cover and the number of vascular plant species comprising ground cover.

Inter-habitat comparison

In ANCOVA with fixed effects "plot type", "canopy cover" and "year", the species richness of the ground cover significantly depended only on the effects "plot type" (Fplot type(1; 60) = 13.61; P = 0.0005) and "canopy cover" (Fcover(1; 60) = 6.02; P = 0.0170). No other effects, including interaction effects, were significant. This means that the angle of inclination of the lines (coefficients b in the equation y = a + bx) describing the relationship between canopy cover and the number of species of ground cover on plots dominated by the ash-leaved maple and other tree species did not differ (Fig. 8a). An increase of 10% in canopy cover induces a decrease in the number of ground cover species by 5.82 ± 3.30 species per 400 m2 (P = 0.0866) in the An+ plots and by 4.77 ± 2.66 species per 400 m2 (P = 0.0820) in the An− plots.

Figure 8

Relationship between the average canopy cover and the number of ground cover species per 400 m2 (inter-habitat comparison) (a) and per 1 m2 (intra-habitat comparison) at plots dominated by native tree species (green circles) (b), alien tree species, excluding Acer negundo (white circles) (c), and individually—Acer negundo (pink circles) (d). The points are slightly jittered to avoid overlapping on Figures b–d. The approximations in the range of 55–95% canopy cover in Figures b–d are shown with red lines.

Intra-habitat comparison

Despite the spatial autocorrelation of the parameters, the statistical significance of the relationships between canopy cover and the richness of the ground cover differed little in Pearson correlation and spatial correlation. Under native plant canopies (Fig. 8b) r =  − 0.18, conventional P < 0.0001, Dutilleul corrected P = 0.0002. Under alien plant canopies (Fig. 8c) r =  − 0.27, conventional P = 0.0035, Dutilleul corrected P = 0.0128. Under canopies of A. negundo (Fig. 8d) r =  − 0.0234, conventional P = 0.7465, Dutilleul corrected P = 0.7471.

In ANCOVA with the factors "plot type" and "canopy cover", the number of ground cover species on the site significantly depended only on the main effects Fplot type(2; 794) = 25.73 (P < 0.0001) and Fcover(1; 794) = 12.43 (P = 0.0004). The "plot type × canopy cover" interaction was not significant: Fplot type × cover(2; 794) = 1.69; P = 0.1855; this indicates that we did not establish a difference in the angle of inclination of the lines describing the relationship between the canopy cover and the number of ground cover species per m2 on plots with different woody dominants (Fig. 8a). However, the species richness of the ground cover changed with the growth of the canopy cover depending on the dominant plants. A significant decrease in species richness with an increase of canopy cover was observed in plots with a dominance of both native (with a 10% increase in canopy cover by 0.27 ± 0.07 species per m2; P < 0.0001) and alien plants (with a 10% increase in canopy cover by 0.38 ± 0.13 species per m2; P = 0.0035). On plots dominated by A. negundo in the whole variety of canopy cover (5–95%), the number of ground cover species did not change significantly with an increase in canopy cover. With an increase in canopy cover of 10%, the number of ground cover species per m2 decreased only by 0.04 ± 0.11; P = 0.7465.

Using breakpoint linear regression, we found that the shading effect on terrestrial plants is especially appeared with reaching 55–60% values of total canopy cover. For the relationship "canopy cover—species richness", the ordinates of the breakpoints of linear regression on plots dominated by native tree plants were 57 ± 4% of canopy cover. On plots dominated by alien plants ordinates of the breakpoints were 55 ± 15% of canopy cover, on plots dominated by A. negundo—55 ± 7%. With this in mind, Fig. 8b–d additionally show lines describing the change in the richness of the ground cover in the range of 55–90% of canopy cover. In this range, a noticeable decrease in species richness on plots dominated by native plants was observed (with an increase of canopy cover by 10%—by 0.72 ± 0.11 species per 1 m2; P < 0.0001) and plots with A. negundo (with an increase of canopy cover by 10%—by 0.40 ± 0.17 species per 1 m2; P = 0.0190).


Our results show the general consistency of the appearance at the two spatial scales we observed. We found that in the results obtained both for inter-habitat and intra-habitat comparisons, assessments of the light regime transformation were generally similar. So, in both studies, we confirmed that the canopy cover of A. negundo is higher than the canopy covers of other tree species. Additionally, we observed a decrease in ground layer species richness linked with an increase in canopy cover. In the inter-habitat comparison, this effect was detected both in thickets of ash-leaved maple and in thickets of other tree species. In our intra-habitat comparison, this effect was traced under the canopies of native and alien trees but not under the canopies of A. negundo.

Our first working hypothesis supposed that A. negundo can create strong shading. The ash-leaved maple seems to produce a denser canopy than many other woody species. This thesis cannot be strictly proven by the inter-habitat comparison because we purposefully selected plots in pairs of communities An+ and An− with high and equal canopy cover. However, the intra-habitat comparison also clearly shows that the average cover of A. negundo is greater. In intra-habitat comparison, estimates of canopy cover under different types of trees and shrubs were gathered randomly. However, the ash-leaved maple does not form the highest canopy cover of leaves present in this study. There are several native and alien plants that form denser canopies. Therefore, it is more correct to summarise our results as the following: A. negundo creates a canopy of leaves which is equally as dense as the canopy of other alien trees but denser than that of native trees.

This fact could have several explanations. For example, the ability to show varying levels of shading is connected with the different heights of the lower canopy edge. According to our estimates, the higher canopies shade the soil surface at the vertical projection point less than lower canopies: trees of the first layer (n = 218) yielded shading of 55 ± 1%; of the second layer (A. negundo [n = 194] yielded shading of 70 ± 1%; other species (n = 131) yielded shading of 67 ± 1%); and shrubs (n = 257) yielded shading of 77%. Furthermore, we suggest that high canopy cover formed by alien plants may have a different structure for leaf canopy, with different degrees of leaf overlap or of damage to leaves by phytophages50,51,52.

The conclusion that the ash-leaved maple forms a denser canopy of leaves than native trees is consistent with most of the published data about this species8,38. This conclusion is relative to some other invasive plants33,34,39,40.

Our second working hypothesis supposed that under the canopy of A. negundo, the species richness of the ground cover is lower than under other alien or native tree species canopy. In both inter-habitat and intra-habitat comparisons, we registered a reduced ground cover species richness under canopies of ash-leaved maple. This result confirms the generally accepted idea that alien plants produce a negative impact on the diversity of native communities. Our earlier inter-habitat comparison showed a decrease in alpha diversity influenced by A. negundo of about 40%10. However, unlike the conclusions reached through inter-habitat comparison7,9,10,36,48,49, the 20% decrease in the diversity of ground cover in our intra-habitat comparison can be linked with the traits of the alien plants rather than with the traits of the habitats they invade.

Our third hypothesis supposed that with an increase in shading level, the number of grass species equally decreases both under A. negundo and under other tree species. In our inter-habitat comparison, an increase in canopy cover was linked with a decrease in plant diversity both under ash-leaved maple shading and that of other trees. However, the intra-habitat comparison illustrated an increase in the canopy cover of A. negundo that was not accompanied by a decrease in plant diversity.

However, on both spatial scales, the number of grass species under crowns of A. negundo was less than under crowns of native trees over the whole range of canopy cover. Consequently, the transformation of the light regime of communities does not explain the decrease in plant richness in A. negundo thickets (Fig. 9). We cannot confirm that our results describe all possible effects of light regime transformation under an ash-leaved maple canopy. Notably, in the Middle Urals, the maximum sun height above the horizon during the summer season is 43–56°. Although the photos shot vertically upward show the canopy cover at the point the camera was located, they do not fully describe the lighting conditions for each plot because they ignore the intensity of side light flux. The difference between the estimates of canopy cover and illumination level may be associated with the preservation of autocorrelation for estimates of the ground cover species richness after considering the effects of canopy cover (see Supplementary file 4). The difference between the estimates of canopy cover and illumination may be especially large for the intra-habitat comparison, but this difference is smaller for the inter-habitat comparison. One more possible consequence of the transformation of light conditions under the canopy of A. negundo is a specific change in the spectral composition of light.

Figure 9

A probable mechanism of the generation of reduced diversity of the ground cover throughout canopy shading in communities dominated by Acer negundo (pink circles) in comparison with other trees (green circles); rhombus—average rates.

Along with a decrease in illumination, the mechanisms of the suppression of ground cover under the influence of the ash-leaved maple may be different, depending on spatial canopy structure. For example, the fact that A. negundo has a dense and low crown may not only decrease illumination in A. negundo thickets but also blocks the flow of seeds or other plant diaspores. It is known that the diversity and pool of seed banks may decrease in native communities invaded by alien plants18,53, including ash-leaved maple6.

In addition, the ability of alien species to reduce diversity via allelopathic effects is often discussed42,47, and allelopathic activity has been confirmed for the water extracts from A. negundo leaves54,55 and for the soil from its thickets56. However, in another experiment, the allelopathic activity of the soil from the thickets of A. negundo was not confirmed27. Accompanying the direct allelopathic effects on plants of substances secreted by A. negundo, indirect allelopathy is possible and is a probable effect of A. negundo on native plants through its primary effect on soil microorganisms. In this experiment, though we did not confirm the effect of soil from ash-leaved maple thickets on seed germination, we observed suppression of mycorrhiza in model grasses27. Consequently, direct and indirect allelopathy are possible mechanisms for the influence of A. negundo on native plants, although their ecological impact requires further evaluation.


We observed decreased ground cover plant species in large (inter-habitat comparison) and small (intra-habitat comparison) vegetation areas dominated by the alien maple Acer negundo compared to areas dominated by native tree and shrub species. At the same time, the dominance of the ash-leaved maple was accompanied by a recorded higher canopy cover of a height of 1–1.2 m. Additionally, in both studies, we established a negative correlation between the canopy cover of trees and the number of vascular plant species of ground cover. Thus, the capture of light and restriction of its amount for other species is a central mechanism that causes several of the negative effects of A. negundo on native communities. Similar to other studies36, we found that high canopy cover, which produces high shading, is not the only mechanism by which A. negundo realises its potential as a transformer species. Most likely, the ash-leaved maple affects native plants and the structure of communities via additional factors. We believe that further studies are needed to understand which of these mechanisms (influence on the seed bank; direct allelopathy; influence on soil microorganisms; transformation of the physicochemical properties of soil) can explain the impact of Acer negundo on the diversity and composition of plant communities.


Study area

The data was collected in urbanised habitats in the southern taiga subzone of the boreal zone of the Middle Urals, located in the territory of the Yekaterinburg urban agglomeration. The average annual temperature is + 3 °C, which has shown an upward trend (1 °C increase in the last 25 years). The average annual precipitation is 542 mm. The average height of snow cover in February is 20–25 cm, and the average duration of snow cover is 160–180 days. Yekaterinburg is a large city with a population of 1.5 million people. The surrounding territories are dominated by pine forests of natural origin on sod-podzolic soils and brown soils. The territory of Yekaterinburg is heavily polluted due to a large number of industrial enterprises and the high density of the transport network. The climate is moderately continental with cold winters and warm summers. A. negundo actively restores itself in the urbanised forests of the Middle Urals5,57. To test our working hypotheses, we executed two studies: the first was an inter-habitat comparison, while the second was carried out as an intra-habitat comparison.

Inter-habitat comparison

Sample plots

The inter-habitat comparison was carried out according to a randomized block design with repeated measurements in time 13 sites of intra-urban vegetation located in the city of Yekaterinburg and its suburbs in the Middle Urals, Russia. The area of the site allowed the placement of at least two plots measuring 20 × 20 m. At each site, we selected two plots, the first in the thickets dominated by ash-leaved maple and the second in thickets dominated by other tree species. A tree species was recognized as dominant if its stem number per the sample plot was the largest. Additionally, its stem number was more than 30% of the total stem number per the sample plot. Thus, two plots in one area formed a linked pair of one plot with the studied impact of A. negundo; (An +) and one without its impact, (An− ; factor ‘plot type’). Paired plots were located as close together as possible and no further than 0.4 km from each other. Moreover, they were similar by a height above sea level and location relative to human housing and infrastructure, and they had close values in terms of canopy cover. The studied communities occupied habitats whose area ranged from 0.08. to 42.26 ha. The distance from the studied communities to the nearest buildings was from 10 to495 m; from automobile roads—from 10 to 280 m. Most of the sites were located on smooth hillsides. Three sites were situated in local depressions with stagnant moisture. The proportion of the ash-leaved maple stems varied from 35 to 100% (average—74%) in An+ plots; from 0 to 27% (average—12%) in An− plots. According to the European nature information system (EUNIS) habitat classification, 10 sites were classified as small green spaces completely or almost surrounded by buildings (X22) or roads (X23), three sites as large parks (X11) and one site as low forest or shrubs in wetlands (F9)58. In total, we laid 26 plots. An− plots were dominated by Ulmus laevis Huds. (three plots), Pinus sylvestris L. (three), Malus baccata (L.) Borkh (two), Prunus padus Mill. (one), Salix fragilis L. (one), Tilia cordata Mill. (one), Sorbus aucuparia L. (one), Salix alba L. (one). Geographical coordinates of sample plots and generalised data of their characteristics are given in the supplementary material (see Supplementary file 1).

Descriptions of vegetation

We performed descriptions of vegetation every year from 2017–2019. In 2018, the vegetation on one of the sites was destroyed. We therefore laid an extra couple of plots at the another site in 2018. We performed 72 descriptions covering the period from June to August in 2017, 2018 and 2019 (24 descriptions per year). We recorded species richness and the total cover of the aboveground organs of plants in the herbaceous layer (in %). The species richness was measured as the number of species per 400 m2.

Estimation of canopy cover

Every year in mid-July, we took 10 colour photos of the canopy at each plot. We took the photos in randomly selected places, pointing the camera straight up to a height of 0.8–1.2 m. We used a Lumix DMC-FP2 digital camera (CCD sensor: 1/2.5″/10.3 million pixels/primary colour filter; photo resolution: 3648 × 2736 pixels). In total, we took 720 photos. To prepare images for analysis, we used Adobe Photoshop 11.0 (Adobe System Inc., 2008). Each photo was converted into binary so that crowns, tree trunks and other obstacles to natural sunlight were rendered as black pixels. The open sky was displayed as white pixels. The analysis of canopy cover was performed in Matlab R2018b (, The MathWorks Inc., 2018) using the original code. The code and an example of a pre- and post-processing photo of canopies are published in the supplementary material (see Supplementary file 2).

Intra-habitat comparison


The second study was conducted in June 2018 in the Yugo-Zapadny forest park in the city of Yekaterinburg. We performed it as an analysis of vegetation at 800 points, spatially joined in a regular grid located in one habitat type. According to the EUNIS classification, a forest park is an X11 habitat type (large parks)58. We laid the site measuring 795 × 20 m on the 7°-northerly slope from the top of a small ridge to the middle of the slope. The site was generally populated by nettle pine forests with an undergrowth of Rubus idaeus L., forb-grass and small-grass. The pine stand was strongly disrupted by selective felling, and derivative communities with Populus balsamifera L. and A. negundo in the tree layer were formed at certain places. On a 795 × 20 m site, we laid five parallel transects 795 m in length on each of which 160 plots were marked at 5 m intervals. As a result, we formed a square grid with a step of 5 m and 800 plots in its nodes. Situation of the study site and generalised data of its characteristics are given in the supplementary material (see Supplementary file 1).

Characteristics of plant communities and the estimation of canopy cover

We took two photos with the Lumix DMC-FP2 digital camera at each of the 800 plots. The first photo was taken straight up from a height of 0.8–1.2 m, while the second was taken straight down from a height of 1.5–2 m. At the same time, a 1 × 1 m frame was laid on the ground.

In each canopy photo, the total canopy cover as a percentage of the field of view where 100% considered the fully closed canopy, and 0%—the fully opened sky, was visually estimated in 5% increments. We also identified the species or at minimum the genus of trees and shrubs which fell into the frame of each photo. The proportion of coverage of each taxon was estimated by eye. In each photo of the ground cover, we identified the species, the genus or at minimum the family of low shrubs, herbs and individual trees less than 1.5 m in height. We counted only the number of taxa that were located within a 1 × 1 m frame.

During plant identification, we used a list including 131 species based on 27 preliminary geobotanical descriptions of this section of the forest park6. We were able to identify some of the plants in the photos only to the family or genus level. At the same time, plants we were unable to identify to the species level were considered as different conditional species if we could distinguish their morphological features. This made it possible to sufficiently fully calculate the total number of vascular plant species on each plot. We used the term ‘species richness’ when evaluating alpha diversity. The community composition is sometimes analyzed from photos to solve particular problems59,60.

At each site, we identified a dominant taxon of woody plants without dividing their life forms (shrubs, undergrowth trees or trees of the second and first layers). The taxon which occupied the largest share of the total canopy cover in the image was considered dominant.

In the array of 800 measurements, the tree dominant species' canopy cover relative to the total canopy cover varied from 30 to 100% (average—69% of the total canopy cover). But on some plots, total canopy cover was low, including the dominant taxon canopy cover. Thus, the dominant taxon total canopy cover was less than 10% only at 16 plots, from 10 to 20%—at 26 plots. The number of plots with a low total canopy cover of the dominant was few (total canopy cover of the dominant taxon was less than 20% only on 4.5% of the plots). Therefore, we decided not to exclude such sites from the analysis to preserve the ability to analyze all 800 measurements.All woody plant species encountered were assigned to one of two groups: native (Betula spp.; Crataegus sanguinea Pall.; Larix sibirica Ledeb.; Lonicera xylosteum L.; Prunus padus L.; Pinus sylvestris L.; Populus tremula L.; Salix spp.; Sorbus aucuparia L.; Tilia cordata Mill.; Viburnum opulus L.) or alien (Acer negundo L.; Acer tataricum L.; Amelanchier spicata (Lam.) K. Koch; Caragana arborescens Lam.; Cotoneaster lucidus Schltdl; Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall; Malus baccata (L.) Borkh; Populus balsamifera L.; Ulmus laevis Huds.).

Data analysis

During the inter-habitat comparison, we analyzed values of canopy cover and ground cover species richness using a mixed ANOVA model with fixed effects "plot type" and "year of observation" and with an additional random effect "site" to take into account the spatial connectivity of areas An+ and An− . The link of canopy cover and the number of ground cover species in the inter-habitat comparison we assessed using ANCOVA with discrete factors "plot type" and "year" and the continual factor "canopy cover". Additionally, we used the breakpoint regression to determine whether the species richness of the terrestrial layer changes in the same or different way with increasing shading at high and low levels of crown density. The breakpoint regression was made as a combination of two rays with different inclines, connecting each other at a breakpoint. For intra-habitat comparison, we analyzed the canopy cover values using one-way ANOVA with the factor "plot type". The ground cover species number analyzed using one-way ANOVA with the factor "plot type" and ANCOVA with the discrete factor "plot type" and the continual factor "canopy cover".

In our experimental design of intra-habitat comparison, the appearance of effects related to the spatial interconnection of measures was possible. Therefore, we rechecked some of the results obtained by standard ANOVA, ANCOVA correlation analysis methods using spatial statistical methods. We calculated the spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) of the parameters. To determine whether the spatial connectivity of the points affects the mean trait values (canopy cover and species richness of ground cover), we used a mixed ANOVA model with a fixed effect "plot type" and with an additional random effect "block". We defined the block as a group of nearby points placed in 5 × 5, 10 × 10, or 20 × 20 m squares. Additionally, we used Dutilleul correction when calculating the correlation between canopy cover and the ground cover species richness.

For the percentage of canopy cover, we subjected the values to arcsine transformation. The values of the quantities presented in the text are the mean values of the features ± standard errors. In all cases, the text indicates the results of F-tests for fixed effects obtained in full ANOVA / ANCOVA models without excluding individual factors or their interactions. In some cases, when the main factor effects or the interaction of factors were not significant, the results of the F-tests are not shown in the manuscript. The full description of ANOVA / ANCOVA models are presented in the Supplementary material (see Supplementary file 3). The calculations performed in the JMP 10.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc., USA, 2012), STATISTICA 8.0 (StatSoft Inc., USA, 1984–2007), and PASSAGE 261.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Vinogradova, Y. K., Mayorov, S. R. & Khorun, L. V. Chernaya kniga flory Sredney Rossii (Chuzherodnye vidy rasteniy v ekosistemakh Sredney Rossii) (The Black-book of the flora of the Middle Russia (Alien species in the plant communities of the Middle Russia). (GEOS, 2010).

  2. 2.

    Straigytė, L., Cekstere, G., Laivins, M. & Marozas, V. The spread, intensity and invasiveness of the Acer negundo in Riga and Kaunas. Dendrobiology 74, 157–168 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Merceron, N. R., Lamarque, L. J., Delzon, S. & Porté, A. J. Killing it softly: girdling as an efficient eco-friendly method to locally remove invasive Acer negundo. Ecol. Restor. 34, 297–305 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gusev, A. P., Shpilevskaya, N. S. & Veselkin, D. V. The influence of Acer negundo L. on progressive successions in Belarusian landscapes. Vestnik Vitebskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. 94, 47–53 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Veselkin, D. V. & Korzhinevskaya, A. A. Spatial factors of understory adventization in park forests of a large city. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk, Seriya Geograficheskaya. 4, 54–64 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Veselkin, D. V., Korzhinevskaya, A. A. & Podgayevskaya, E. N. The species composition and abundance of alien and invasive understory shrubs and trees in urban forests of Yekaterinburg. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya. 42, 102–118 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Emelyanov, A. V. & Frolova, S. V. Ash-leaf maple (Acer negundo L.) in coastal phytocenoses of the Vorona River. Russ. J. Biol. Invasions 2, 161–163 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Saccone, P., Pagès, J.-P., Girel, J., Brun, J.-J. & Michalet, R. Acer negundo invasion along a successional gradient: Early direct facilitation by native pioneers and late indirect facilitation by conspecifics. New Phytol. 187, 831–842. (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kostina, M. V., Yasinskaya, O. I., Barabanshchikova, N. S. & Orlyuk, F. A. Toward a issue of box elder invasion into the forests around Moscow. Russ. J. Biol. Invasions 7, 47–51 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Veselkin, D. V. & Dubrovin, D. I. Diversity of the grass layer of urbanized communities dominated by invasive Acer negundo. Russ. J. Ecol. 50, 413–421 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Reinhart, K. O., Greene, E. & Callaway, R. M. Effects of Acer platanoides invasion on understory plant communities and tree regeneration in the Rocky Mountains. Ecography 28, 573–582 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schuster, M. J. & Reich, P. B. Amur maple (Acer ginnala): an emerging invasive plant in North America. Biol. Invasions 20, 2997–3007 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Richardson, D. M. et al. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 6, 93–107 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gorchov, D. L. & Trisel, D. E. Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae), on the growth and survival of native tree seedlings. Plant Ecol. 166, 13–24 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Knight, K. S., Oleksyn, J., Jagodzinski, A. M., Reich, P. B. & Kasprowicz, M. Overstorey tree species regulate colonization by native and exotic plants: A source of positive relationships between understorey diversity and invasibility. Divers. Distrib. 14, 666–675 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Niinemets, Ü. A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol. Res. 25, 693–714 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Allison, S. D. & Vitousek, P. M. Rapid nutrient cycling in leaf litter from invasive plants in Hawaii. Oecologia 141, 612–619 (2004).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gioria, M. & Osborne, B. A. Resource competition in plant invasions: Emerging patterns and research needs. Front. Plant Sci. (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bonifacio, E. et al. Alien red oak affects soil organic matter cycling and nutrient availability in low-fertility well-developed soils. Plant Soil 395, 215–229 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Horodecki, P. & Jagodzínski, A. M. Tree species effects on litter decomposition in pure stands on afforested post-mining sites. For. Ecol. Manag. 406, 1–11 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhang, P., Li, B., Wu, J. & Hu, S. Invasive plants differentially affect soil biota through litter and rhizosphere pathways: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 22, 200–210 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Rodriguez, A. & Holben, W. E. Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature 427, 731–733 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Stinson, K. A. et al. Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biol. (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Suding, K. N. et al. Consequences of plant-soil feedbacks in invasion. J. Ecol. 101, 298–308 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mueller, K. E. et al. Light, earthworms, and soil resources as predictors of diversity of 10 soil invertebrate groups across monocultures of 14 tree species. Soil Biol. Biochem. 92, 184–198 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kamczyc, J., Dyderski, M. K., Horodecki, P. & Jagodzinski, A. M. Mite communities (Acari, Mesostigmata) in the initially decomposed ‘litter islands’ of 11 tree species in scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forest. Forests (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Veselkin, D. V., Rafikova, O. S. & Ekshibarov, E. D. The soil of invasive Acer negundo thickets is unfavorable for mycorrhizal formation in native herbs. Zh. Obshch. Biol. 80, 214–225 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gilliam, F. S. & Roberts, M. R. Interactions between the herbaceous layer and overstory canopy of eastern forests in The herbaceous layer in forests of Eastern North America (ed. Gilliam, F. S.) 233–254 (Oxford, 2014).

  29. 29.

    Landuyt, D. et al. The functional role of temperate forest understorey vegetation in a changing world. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3625–3641 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Czapiewska, N., Dyderski, M. K. & Jagodzinski, A. M. Seasonal dynamics of floodplain forest understory—Impacts of degradation, light availability and temperature on biomass and species composition. Forests (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Canham, C. D., Finzi, A. C., Pacala, S. W. & Burbank, D. H. Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: Interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees. Can. J. For. Res. 24, 337–349 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Barbier, S., Gosselin, F. & Balandier, P. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—A critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 254, 1–15 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Reinhart, K. O., Gurnee, J., Tirado, R. & Callaway, R. M. Invasion through quantitative effects: Intense shade drives native decline and invasive success. Ecol. Appl. 16, 1821–1831 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Nilsson, C., Engelmark, O., Cory, J., Forsslund, A. & Carlborg, E. Differences in litter cover and understory flora between stands of introduced lodgepole pine and native Scots pine in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 255, 1900–1905 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bravo-Monasterio, P., Pauchard, A. & Fajardo, A. Pinus contorta invasion into treeless steppe reduces species richness and alters species traits of the local community. Biol. Invasions 18, 1883–1894 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lanta, V., Hyvönen, T. & Norrdahl, K. Non-native and native shrubs have differing impacts on species diversity and composition of associated plant communities. Plant Ecol. 214, 1517–1528 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Dyderski, M. K. & Jagodzinski, A. M. Similar impacts of alien and native tree species on understory light availability in a temperate forest. Forests (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bottollier-Curtet, M. et al. Light interception principally drives the understory response to boxelder invasion in riparian forests. Biol. Invasions 14, 1445–1458 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cusack, D. F. & McCleery, T. L. Patterns in understory woody diversity and soil nitrogen across native- and non-native-urban tropical forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 318, 34–43 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Berg, C., Drescherl, A. & Essl, F. Using relevé-based metrics to explain invasion patterns of alien trees in temperate forests. Tuexenia. 37, 127–142 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hladyz, S., Abjornsson, K., Giller, P. S. & Woodward, G. Impacts of an aggressive riparian invader on community structure and ecosystem functioning in stream food webs. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 443–452 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Call, L. J. & Nilsen, E. T. Analysis of interactions between the invasive tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and the native black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). Plant Ecol. 176, 275–285 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dorning, M. & Cipollini, D. Leaf and root extracts of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, inhibit seed germination of three herbs with no autotoxic effects. Plant Ecol. 184, 287–296 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kumar, A. S. & Bais, H. P. Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion in Plant communication from an ecological perspective. Signaling and communication in plants (ed. Baluška, F. & Ninkovic, V.) 61–74 (Berlin, 2010).

  45. 45.

    Cipollini, D., Rigsby, C. M. & Barto, E. K. Microbes as targets and mediators of allelopathy in plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 38, 714–727 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Nielsen, J. A., Frew, R. D., Whigam, P. A., Callaway, R. M. & Dickinson, K. J. M. Germination and growth responses of co-occurring grass species to soil from under invasive Thymus vulgaris. Allelopath. J. 35, 139–152 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Gruntman, M., Segev, U., Glauser, G. & Tielbörger, K. Evolution of plant defences along an invasion chronosequence: Defence is lost due to enemy release—but not forever. J. Ecol. 105, 255–264 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Maron, J. L. & Marler, M. Effects of native species diversity and resource additions on invader impact. Am. Nat. 172, 18–33 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hejda, M., Pyšek, P. & Jarošík, V. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J. Ecol. 97, 393–403 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Adams, J. M. et al. A cross-continental test of the enemy release hypothesis: leaf herbivory on Acer platanoides (L.) is three times lower in North America than in its native Europe. Biol. Invasions 11, 1005–1016 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Cincotta, C. L., Adams, J. M. & Holzapfel, C. Testing the enemy release hypothesis: A comparison of foliar insect herbivory of the exotic Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) and the native sugar maple (A. saccharum L.). Biol. Invasions 11, 379–388 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Veselkin, D. V. et al. Levels of leaf damage by phyllophages in invasive Acer negundo and Native Betula pendula and Salix caprea. Russ. J. Ecol. 50, 511–516 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Gioria, M., Pyšek, P. & Moravcová, L. Soil seed banks in plant invasions: promoting species invasiveness and long-term impact on plant community dynamics. Preslia 84, 327–350 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Csiszár, A. Allelopathic effect of invasive woody plant species in Hungary. Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica. 5, 9–17 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Csiszár, Á. et al. Allelopathic potential of some invasive plant species occurring in Hungary. Allelopath. J. 31, 309–318 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Yeryomenko, Y. A. Allelopathic activity of invasive arboreal species. Russ. J. Biol. Invasions 5, 146–150 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Veselkin, D. V., Kiseleva, O. A., Ekshibarov, E. D., Rafikova, O. S. & Korzhinevskaya, A. A. Abundance and diversity of seedlings of the soil seed bank in the monospecific stands of the invasive species Acer negundo L.. Russ. J. Biol. Invasions. 9, 108–113 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Davies, C. E., Moss, D. & Hill, M. O. EUNIS Habitat Classification Revised 2004 (European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity, (2004).

  59. 59.

    Dopico, E., Ardura, A. & Garcia-Valguez, E. Exploring changes in biodiversity through pictures: A citizen science experience. Soc. Nat. Resour. 30, 1049–1063. (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Fitzgerald, N. B., Kirkpatrick, J. B. & Scott, J. J. Rephotography, permanent plots and remote sensing data provide varying insights on vegetation change on subantarctic Macquarie Island, 1980–2015. Austral Ecol. (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Rosenberg, M. S. & Anderson, C. D. PASSAGE: Pattern analysis, spatial statistics, and geographic exegesis version 2. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2, 229–232. (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank PhD. O.V. Tolkachev and PhD. E.A. Malkova for marking 800 points on the ground. Additionally, we are grateful to two unknown reviewers whose comments helped improve the manuscript substantially.


The field stage of the study was performed under the State Assignment of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (AAAA-A19-119031890084-6). Interpretation of images and data analysis was carried out as part of the project of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, No. 20-44-660013-Ural_a.

Author information




D.V.V. conceived the ideas, designed the research, and analyzed data. D.I.D. collected the field data. D.I.D. and L.A.P. performed processing and prepared data for analysis. D.V.V. wrote the text of the paper and prepared all the figures in Russian. D.I.D. translated text and figures into English. D.V.V., D.I.D., and L.A.P. corrected and discussed the text. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. I. Dubrovin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Veselkin, D.V., Dubrovin, D.I. & Pustovalova, L.A. High canopy cover of invasive Acer negundo L. affects ground vegetation taxonomic richness. Sci Rep 11, 20758 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links