Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


Trends in gender pay gaps of scientists and engineers in academia and industry


An analysis of sectoral differences in gender pay gap over career lifecycles reveals that academia has a wider gender pay gap relative to industry.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Binned scatter plot of inflation-adjusted salary over career lifecycle.
Fig. 2: Estimated gender gaps in rate of pay increase over entry-stage salary in academia and industry.
Fig. 3: Estimated gender gap in probability of holding a high-value job and in rate of pay increase.

Data availability

The data used in our analyses are restricted-use SDR data from the NSF. Researchers may apply for a license from NSF to access these data.

Code availability

Links to the STATA code for data cleaning, variable construction, regressions and figures, with which users can replicate our results from raw SDR data, will be posted at


  1. 1.

    National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. US doctorates in the 20th century (NSF 06-319) (NSF, 2006);

  2. 2.

    National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation. Doctoral recipients from US universities: 2018 (Special Report NSF 20–301) (NSF, 2019);

  3. 3.

    Levin, S. G. & Stephan, P. E. Sex Roles 38, 1049–1064 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ginther, D.K. Does science discriminate against women? Evidence from academia, 1973–1997. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working Paper No. 2001–2. (2001).

  5. 5.

    Goldin, C. Am. Econ. Rev. 104, 1091–1119 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Blau, F. D. & Kahn, L. M. J. Econ. Lit. 55, 789–865 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S. & Williams, W. M. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 15, 75–141 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadir, S. & Vanneman, R. Soc. Forces 80, 655–681 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Frost, B., Hazard, P. & Kimmins, D. The real gap: fixing the gender pay divide (Korn Ferry Hay group, 2018);

  10. 10.

    England, P., Farkas, G., Kilbourne, B. S. & Dou, T. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53, 544–558 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    McPherson, D. A. & Hirsch, B. T. J. Labor Econ. 13, 426–471 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Budig, M. J. Soc. Probl. 49, 258–277 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cohen, P. N. & Huffman, M. L. Am. Sociol. Rev. 68, 443–463 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wennerås, C. & Wold, A. Nature 387, 341–343 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Grant, J., Burden, S. & Breen, G. Nature 390, 438 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Steinpreis, R., Anders, R. K. & Ritzke, K. D. Sex Roles 41, 509–528 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Blau, F. D., Currie, J. M., Croson, R. T. A. & Ginther, D. K. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 348–352 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ceci, S. J. & Williams, W. M. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3157–3162 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ginther, D.K. & Kahn, S. in Science and Engineering Careers in the United States: An Analysis of Markets and Employment (eds. Freeman, R. B. & Goroff, D. F.) 163–194 (University of Chicago Press, 2009).

  20. 20.

    Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J. & Handelsman, J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16474–16479 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Glynn, C. J. & Hugh, M. Sci. Commun. 35, 603–625 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Reuben, E., Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4403–4408 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sheltzer, J. M. & Smith, J. C. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10107–10112 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Roach, M. & Sauermann, H. Res. Policy 39, 422–434 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors acknowledge feedback from P. Stephan and S. Braguinsky. This research is supported by NSF grant no. 1550727 and JSPS KAKENHI grant no. 15KK0078.

Author information




All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization, resource acquisition, methodology, data analysis and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waverly W. Ding.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data, Tables 1–15 and Figs. 1–3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, W.W., Ohyama, A. & Agarwal, R. Trends in gender pay gaps of scientists and engineers in academia and industry. Nat Biotechnol 39, 1019–1024 (2021).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing