Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cold-induced Arabidopsis FRIGIDA nuclear condensates for FLC repression

Abstract

Plants use seasonal temperature cues to time the transition to reproduction. In Arabidopsis thaliana, winter cold epigenetically silences the floral repressor locus FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) through POLYCOMB REPRESSIVE COMPLEX 2 (PRC2)1. This vernalization process aligns flowering with spring. A prerequisite for silencing is transcriptional downregulation of FLC, but how this occurs in the fluctuating temperature regimes of autumn is unknown2,3,4. Transcriptional repression correlates with decreased local levels of histone H3 trimethylation at K36 (H3K36me3) and H3 trimethylation at K4 (H3K4me3)5,6, which are deposited during FRIGIDA (FRI)-dependent activation of FLC7,8,9,10. Here we show that cold rapidly promotes the formation of FRI nuclear condensates that do not colocalize with an active FLC locus. This correlates with reduced FRI occupancy at the FLC promoter and FLC repression. Warm temperature spikes reverse this process, buffering FLC shutdown to prevent premature flowering. The accumulation of condensates in the cold is affected by specific co-transcriptional regulators and cold induction of a specific isoform of the antisense RNA COOLAIR5,11. Our work describes the dynamic partitioning of a transcriptional activator conferring plasticity in response to natural temperature fluctuations, thus enabling plants to effectively monitor seasonal progression.

Main

Plants overwinter before flowering in Arabidopsis through FRI-dependent upregulation of FLC. This mechanism requires FRIGIDA-LIKE 1 (FRL1), FRIGIDA-ESSENTIAL 1 (FES1), SUPPRESSOR OF FRIGIDA 4 (SUF4) and FLC EXPRESSOR (FLX), which associate in a FRI complex8. In laboratory conditions of constant cold, FLC is transcriptionally repressed in around two to three weeks5,6,11. However, in natural autumnal fluctuating temperatures in field conditions, FLC transcriptional shutdown took many months3,4. We therefore investigated whether and how FRI function might change in response to fluctuating temperature.

FRI condensates accumulate in the cold

First, we analysed how cold influences FRI protein interactions. A line carrying a translational FRI-GFP fusion, expressed at the same level as endogenous FRI, and fully complementing the fri early flowering phenotype (Extended Data Fig. 1), was used for immunoprecipitation in combination with mass spectrometry (IP–MS)10 (Supplementary Table 1). FRI–GFP did not enrich any of the FRI complex components from warm-grown plant extracts, but, counterintuitively, FRI–GFP accumulated in plants that underwent two weeks of cold exposure, and in these conditions FRL1 and FRL2—but not FLX, SUF4 or FES1—were enriched8 (Extended Data Table 1). FRI interacted with subunits of the Mediator complex12,13, WDR5a and ATX2 (which promote H3K4me3)7,9,14, the PAF1 complex15, general transcription factors13, RNA-polymerase-II-associated proteins, and many RNA splicing factors and uridine-rich small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs)16,17,18, which suggests that FRI has a role in co-transcriptional regulation (Extended Data Table 1). The higher prevalence of these interactors in extracts from cold-grown plants may reflect the cold-induced accumulation of FRI (Extended Data Table 1).

Second, we analysed the localization of FRI in vivo. Like many other co-transcriptional regulators19,20 we found that FRI–GFP forms nuclear condensates, which were increased in size and number after cold exposure (Fig. 1a, Extended Data Fig. 2a–d). A FRI–Myc fusion showed similar condensate formation (Extended Data Fig. 2e, f). Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) revealed relatively slow FRI–GFP dynamics (Fig. 1b, c), like other biomolecular condensates20, but different to FCA–GFP, which have previously been shown to form liquid-like foci (condensates) with a FRAP recovery time of seconds21. Formation of the FCA–GFP condensates was not enhanced by cold (Extended Data Fig. 2g–i); thus, FRI and FCA condensates have different biophysical properties.

Fig. 1: Cold-promoted FRI nuclear condensates are linked to FLC transcriptional shutdown.
figure 1

a, Confocal microscopic images of FRI–GFP nuclear condensates in root cells in the indicated conditions. For quantitative analysis, see Extended Data Fig. 2c, d. b, c, Images (b) and quantification (c) of FRAP of FRI–GFP nuclear condensates. Time 0 indicates the time of the photobleaching pulse. Red arrows indicate the bleached condensates. Mean ± s.e.m.; n = 10 condensates in 10 cells. d, Confocal analysis of subnuclear colocalization of FRI with the co-expressed proteins in tobacco leaf nuclei. Data represent three independent experiments. e, f, Representative images (e, in the warm; f, in the cold) of nuclei expressing FRI–GFP (green) sequentially hybridized with intronic smFISH probes for FLC (red). DNA was labelled with DAPI (blue). Three independent experiments gave the same conclusion. g, h, Frequency distribution of FRI–GFP condensates (left), non-spliced FLC transcript signals (middle) and their colocalization per nucleus (right) in root cells in the warm (g) and in the cold (h). Numbers of analysed nuclei are as indicated. Scale bars, 5 μm (a, b, d); 10 μm (e, f).

Source data

We then analysed whether the FRI interactors co-associate with FRI in the condensates. FRL1–mScarlet I colocalized with FRI–GFP in nuclear condensates after transient co-expression in tobacco leaves (Fig. 1d) but did not form nuclear condensates when transfected alone (Extended Data Fig. 3a–c). Consistently, loss of FRL1 reduced the cold-induced enhancement of the size and number of FRI condensates (Extended Data Fig. 3d–f). By contrast, FRI condensates were less affected in flx-2 and suf4 mutants (Extended Data Fig. 3d–f), consistent with FRL1, but not FLX or SUF4, immunoprecipitating with FRI (Extended Data Table 1). Other FRI interactors, GFP–ELF7 and TAF15b–GFP, colocalized with FRI–mScarlet I in condensates (Fig. 1d, Extended Data Fig. 3g) and condensates containing the Cajal body marker protein U2B′′ (ref. 18) frequently colocalized with FRI–GFP condensates after cold (Extended Data Fig. 3h–j). FRI condensates may therefore share components with Cajal bodies, similar to PML bodies in mammalian cells22. Overall, these data support the notion that multiple protein interactions enhance the formation of FRI condensates.

We further investigated the domains of FRI that are required for nuclear condensate formation. Consistent with disordered domains having important roles in biomolecular condensation19,21, a GFP fusion protein with a version of FRI in which the C-terminal disordered domain was deleted no longer formed nuclear condensates (Extended Data Fig. 4). This supports the C terminus being required for FRI function23. Deletion of the FRI coiled-coil domains10 also led to loss of condensate formation (Extended Data Fig. 4b, c). A naturally occurring 16-base-pair deletion that is found in the loss-of-function FRI allele in Col-010,23, which would produce a protein without the C-terminal disordered and coiled-coil domains, prevented condensate formation (Extended Data Fig. 4b, c). Thus, both the C-terminal disordered domain and two coiled-coil domains are required for FRI condensation in vivo.

FRI is more stable in the cold

Increased protein concentration is known to promote biomolecular condensation19,20 so we further examined the cold-induced accumulation of FRI. FRI–GFP accumulated after two to four weeks of cold (Extended Data Fig. 5a–c), with no corresponding change in the levels of FRI mRNA (Extended Data Fig. 1a). Analysis of nuclear FRI–TAP showed that this stability was not a consequence of the GFP fusion (Extended Data Fig. 5d). The FRI half-life was measured as less than 24 h in the warm, but more than 24 h in the cold (Extended Data Fig. 5e–h); thus, the cold enhancement of FRI nuclear condensates appears to be a consequence of increased FRI protein stability.

Overexpression using 35S:FRI-GFP (Extended Data Fig. 6a, b) led to a small accumulation of FRI–GFP protein after two weeks of cold exposure and a decrease after four weeks (Extended Data Fig. 6c–e), although FRI is less stable in warm than in cold conditions (Extended Data Fig. 6f). A previous report showed that FRI abundance decreased in the cold24, which may be a consequence of the medium as FRI protein is highly induced by glucose in warm conditions (Extended Data Fig. 6f). Overexpression of FRI–GFP is likely to influence nuclear condensate dynamics25, but one to four weeks of cold still enhanced FRI–GFP condensation even though more FRI condensates were found in warm-grown 35S:FRI-GFP lines compared to FRI-GFP (Extended Data Fig. 6g–i).

Levels of FRI–GFP protein decreased in frl1-1 and suf4 mutants, with no concomitant change in FRI-GFP mRNA8 (Extended Data Fig. 6j–l). By contrast, FRI–GFP protein levels in flx-2 did not change (Extended Data Fig. 6k, l), despite the disruption to FRI condensation (Extended Data Fig. 3d–f), supporting the notion that increased protein concentration is not sufficient for cold enhancement of FRI condensate formation. Together, these data show that cold stabilization of FRI and increased interaction with multiple factors reciprocally enhance the formation of FRI condensates.

Condensates sequester FRI away from FLC

We further addressed the functional consequences of FRI nuclear condensate formation. FRI expanded the zone of FLC expression in warm-grown plants and this was antagonized by cold exposure26 (Extended Data Fig. 7a, b). Association of FRI–GFP with the FLC 5′ region in warm conditions8,9 decreased after two weeks of cold exposure (Extended Data Fig. 7c–f), paralleling the decrease in FLC transcription5,11,26 (Extended Data Fig. 7g) and raising the possibility that condensates are linked to FLC transcriptional repression. We used single-molecule RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (smRNA FISH) and FLC intron 1 probes27 to identify nascent FLC transcripts that mark transcriptionally active FLC loci and investigated whether FRI nuclear condensates associated with an active FLC locus. The nascent FLC transcripts and the FRI–GFP condensates never colocalized with each other (Fig. 1e–h). Notably, FRI association with the COOLAIR promoter increased after two weeks of cold exposure (Extended Data Fig. 7e), consistent with COOLAIR upregulation5,11,26. However, despite more cells transcribing COOLAIR in the cold26 and more FRI condensates, we did not detect any colocalization between non-spliced COOLAIR clouds and FRI–GFP condensates (Extended Data Fig. 7h). FRI and its associated factors may therefore be sequestered into nuclear condensates away from the FLC locus, with nascent transcription dissolving any condensates at the locus28.

Supporting this hypothesis, in the 35S:FRI-GFP line, in which more FRI nuclear condensates form (Extended Data Fig. 6g–i), FLC transcript levels are lower (Extended Data Fig. 7i, j) and a reduction of FRI nuclear condensates in the frl1-1 mutant (Extended Data Fig. 3d–f) correlates with a slower FLC transcriptional shutdown (Extended Data Fig. 7k–m). The low levels of FLC transcript in flx-2 and suf4 suggest a different mechanism (Extended Data Fig. 7k–m). FLX and SUF4 appear to promote the ability of FRI to transcriptionally activate, but they have less of a role in cold-induced FRI condensation (Extended Data Fig. 3d–f).

FRI condensates track temperature shifts

FLC transcriptional shutdown occurs during autumn as temperatures fluctuate widely over daily and weekly timescales3,4, so we tested whether the cold-induced sequestration of FRI has an important role in fluctuating temperatures. FRI–GFP nuclear condensate dynamics were analysed during a 12-h transient cold exposure (mimicking a cool night in autumn)3. We found that FRI–GFP condensates gradually increased in size and number (Fig. 2a, Extended Data Fig. 8a, b), through a process requiring protein synthesis (Extended Data Fig. 5e–h). The accumulation of FRI condensates correlated with downregulation of FLC to its lowest expression 12 h after transfer to cold (Fig. 2b), which was further repressed after 2 weeks of cold exposure (Extended Data Fig. 8a–c). Thus, FRI condensation increases rapidly in response to decreasing temperature, correlating with FLC transcriptional shutdown.

Fig. 2: Short-term temperature fluctuations influence the formation of FRI nuclear condensates and FLC transcription.
figure 2

a, c, Confocal microscopic images of FRI–GFP nuclear condensates in wild-type (WT) (top) and TEX (bottom) root cells after 0, 6 and 12 h of cold treatment (a) and in wild-type plants after they were returned to the warm for 0, 6, 12 and 24 h after a 2-week cold treatment (c). Scale bars, 5 μm. For quantitative analysis, see Extended Data Fig. 8a, b, d, e. b, d, Relative transcript level of unspliced FLC in the indicated plants within the same time course of changed temperatures in a, c by quantitative PCR with reverse transcription (RT–qPCR). Mean ± s.e.m.; n = 4 (b) and 3 (d) biologically independent experiments.

Source data

It has previously been observed that a spike of high temperature in autumn slows FLC shutdown3,4; thus, we asked whether the cold-induced accumulation of FRI condensates is reversible by warmth. FRI–GFP condensates, monitored at 6-h intervals over the first 24 h after plants were returned to warm temperature, were significantly reduced within the first 6 h and did not recover in either root or leaf cells (Fig. 2c, Extended Data Fig. 8d–f). This process was not fully blocked by inhibiting proteasome-mediated protein degradation (Extended Data Fig. 8g–j). FLC transcription was upregulated in parallel (Fig. 2d) and showed further reactivation after transfer to warm conditions for 10 days (Extended Data Fig. 8k). Therefore, the cold-induced condensation of FRI is easily reversed by warmth, which suggests that the condensates serve as reservoirs allowing a rapid response to warm temperature spikes. These rapid dynamics would buffer the shutdown of FLC transcription in the fluctuating temperatures of autumn, contributing to a requirement for the absence of warmth for FLC silencing3.

To gain further insight into the dynamics of FRI nuclear condensates in response to temperature shifts, we performed a time-lapse experiment using a temperature-controlled microscope stage. This showed that FRI–GFP nuclear condensates undergo dynamic changes in response to changing temperature, disappearing within five hours of a return to warm conditions (Extended Data Fig. 8l, Supplementary Video 1), but being rescued by cold after a three-hour warm spike (Extended Data Fig. 8m, Supplementary Video 2). In response to the temperature shifts, the FRI condensates fluctuated in number as they grew and fused (Extended Data Fig. 8n, o, Supplementary Video 2)—behaviour typical of biomolecular condensates21,28,29. This induction of FRI condensates did not occur in transient assays in tobacco leaves exposed to cold temperatures (Extended Data Fig. 8p–r).

COOLAIR promotes FRI condensates in the cold

To investigate which other cold-specific factors might contribute to the heterotypic interactions required for condensate formation we tested a role for COOLAIR. One COOLAIR isoform is differentially induced by the FRI complex after two weeks of cold (Extended Data Fig. 9a–f): class II.ii, a distally polyadenylated transcript that includes an additional exon5,11 (Fig. 3a). This change in splicing may involve FRI interacting with splicing factors (Extended Data Fig. 3h–j, Extended Data Table 1) that have previously been shown to have a role in cold-responsive gene regulation16,17. RNA immunoprecipitation (RNA-IP) showed that FRI–GFP specifically enriched COOLAIR class II.ii after two weeks of cold (Fig. 3b, Extended Data Fig. 9g, h). In frl1-1, in which the FRI condensation is severely attenuated (Extended Data Fig. 3d–f) but COOLAIR expression is still relatively high (Extended Data Fig. 9a–c), this enrichment was reduced (Extended Data Fig. 9i). Therefore, the FRI–class II.ii interaction is tightly connected with the cold induction of FRI condensation—a conclusion supported by the rapid changes in class II.ii in response to temperature shifts (Fig. 3c, d) and further induction after two weeks of cold (Extended Data Fig. 9f).

Fig. 3: COOLAIR promotes cold induction of FRI–GFP nuclear condensates and sequestration of FRI from the FLC promoter.
figure 3

a, Schematic of FLC and COOLAIR transcripts at the FLC locus. Untranslated regions are indicated by grey boxes and exons by black boxes. kb, kilobase; TSS, transcription start site. b, RNA-IP assay of spliced COOLAIR enrichment by FRI–GFP with UBC as control. Mean ± s.d.; n = 4 replicates over 2 biologically independent experiments. Two-tailed t-test. c, d, Relative transcript level of COOLAIR class II.ii in the indicated plants within the same time course of changed temperatures as in Fig. 2 by RT–qPCR. Mean ± s.e.m.; n = 4 (c) and 3 (d) biologically independent experiments. e, Confocal images of wild-type and TEX root tip nuclei expressing FRI–GFP. Scale bars, 5 μm. For quantitative analysis, see Extended Data Fig. 9j, k. f, FRI–GFP occupancy on FLC promoter region in WT and TEX plants by CHIP. Mean ± s.e.m.; n = 3 biologically independent experiments. The exact distance from TSS referred to a. Two-way ANOVA adjusted by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. NS, no significance. g, A working model for temperature-controlled FRI nuclear condensation in FLC transcriptional regulation. CC, coiled-coil domain; CR, co-transcriptional regulators; DD, disordered domain.

Source data

We next crossed FRI–GFP to a previously described FLC terminator exchange (TEX) line5,26,27. The FLC terminator–COOLAIR promoter is exchanged for an RBCS3B terminator, which prevents the cold induction of COOLAIR transcription5,26 (Fig. 3c). There was no increase in the size of FRI condensates within the first 12 h of plants experiencing cold (Fig. 2a, Extended Data Fig. 8a, b), and both the size and the number of FRI condensates were significantly reduced after two weeks of cold (Fig. 3e, Extended Data Fig. 9j, k). This is linked to decreased levels of FRI protein in TEX, which might reflect negative feedback from reduction of COOLAIR expression (Extended Data Fig. 9l, m). Similarly, the lower cold induction of FRI condensation in flx-2 and suf4 mutants (Extended Data Fig. 3d–f) may relate to reduced COOLAIR expression (Extended Data Fig. 9a–f). In addition, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments showed that the cold-induced reduction of FRI occupancy at the FLC promoter was less in the TEX line compared to the wild type (Fig. 3f), which could account for the inefficient cold-induced FLC transcriptional shutdown in TEX5,26 (Fig. 2b). This mechanism could explain the COOLAIR-facilitated removal of H3K36me3 at the FLC locus in the early vernalization phase5 (Fig. 3g).

Conclusions

Together, our experiments point to a temperature-controlled condensation mechanism that modulates FRI activation of FLC transcription; such a mechanism would facilitate FLC shutdown in natural fluctuating temperatures. FRI associates with transcriptional co-activators and recruits histone modifiers to the FLC promoter, establishing an active transcriptional state at FLC in the warm (Fig. 3g). The instability of FRI in the warm enables a fast turnover of these transcriptional complexes (Fig. 3g). After transfer to the cold, FRI protein is stabilized and changes in protein or COOLAIR interactions result in the accumulation of nuclear condensates that sequester FRI away from the FLC promoter (Fig. 3g). This contrasts with mechanisms in which condensates promote the dwell time of transcriptional regulators at specific genomic loci19. The combinatorial effect of temperature-specific splicing, and splicing-specific nuclear condensation, gives a wide range of possibilities for FLC regulation in different temperature regimes. Given the recognized importance of biological condensates in gene regulation, this type of mechanism may have widespread roles in the plasticity of plant responses to varying environments29,30,31.

Methods

Plant material and growth conditions

All the mutants and transgenic lines were in Columbia-0 (Col-0), except for FCA-GFP and FLC-GUS, which are in Landsberg erecta (Ler). TEX FRI (ref. 5), FCA-GFP (ref. 21), frl1-1 (ref. 32), flx-2 (ref. 33), suf4 (ref. 34) and FLC-GUS with or without FRIJU223 (ref. 35) have previously been described. FRIJU223 is a functional transgenic FRI allele as described previously10. FRI is Col-0 with an introgressive active Sf2 FRI allele and was previously described36. frl1-1, flx-2 and suf4 were crossed into the FRI background to generate frl1-1 FRI, flx-2 FRI and suf4 FRI.

Seeds were surface-sterilized and sown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) agar plates without glucose or sucrose (unless otherwise stated) and kept at 4 °C in the dark for 3 days. For non-vernalization (NV), seedlings were grown in warm conditions (16 h light, 8 h darkness with constant 20 °C) for 10 days unless otherwise stated. For cold treatment, seedlings were pre-grown in warm conditions (16 h light, 8 h darkness with constant 20 °C) for 10 days unless otherwise stated, and then transferred to cold (8 h light, 16 h darkness with constant 5 °C) for a long-term vernalization, such as 2 weeks and 4 weeks (2WV and 4WV). As there is no difference between FRI and fri in response to photoperiod34 and photoperiod influences flowering in parallel with FLC37,38, we use this short-day photoperiod for long-term cold treatment to match natural conditions. For short-term cold treatment (0–12 h), the light conditions were kept the same as in warm conditions. For cold-to-warm transfer experiments, after 1 or 2 weeks of cold treatment, seedlings were moved to warm conditions (16 h light, 8 h darkness with constant 20 °C) for another specified duration, such as 6 h. Plants grow faster in the warm than in the cold (one day growth in the warm is approximately equivalent to seven days in the cold)39, therefore for warm–cold comparisons plants were harvested at the same developmental stage rather than after the same time period.

Plasmid construction and generation of transgenic lines

To generate pFRI:FRI-GFP and pFRI:FRI-Myc constructs, a 4.56-kb PmII/HpaI fragment containing genomic FRI sequence from H51 (ref. 10) was cloned into pBluescript KS (+). This clone spans 0.84 kb upstream of the FRI start codon to 1.4 kb downstream of the FRI stop codon. GFP sequence was amplified and inserted into the XbaI site over the FRI stop codon. The FRI-GFP fragment was then subcloned into SLJ7551540 and transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 (pGV2260) by triparental mating36. Myc sequence was inserted into the XbaI site 6 bp downstream of the FRI start codon. The FRI-Myc fragment was then subcloned into the EcoRI site of pGreenII 0229 and transformed into A. tumefaciens pGV3101 (pMP90). All of the XbaI sites were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis by the oligos listed in Supplementary Table 2. Transgenic FRI-GFP and FRI-Myc plants in the Col-0 background were generated by floral dipping with A. tumefaciens. Transgenic lines with a single insertion were identified in the T2 generation and segregated 3:1 for Basta resistance. Independent FRI-GFP lines showed the same cold-induced condensation.

For the pFRI:FRI-TAP and p35S:FRI-GFP constructs, FRI cDNA was fused with the TAP and GFP sequences, respectively, and FRI-TAP was subcloned into pBluescript KS (+) with the FRI promoter, whereas FRI-GFP was driven by a CaMV35S promoter. pFRI:FRI-TAP and p35S:FRI-GFP in the binary vectors were then transferred into A. tumefaciens. Transgenic plants were also in the Col-0 background.

The 35S:GFP-ELF7 (ref. 41), pTAF15b:TAF15b-GFP (ref. 42) and pCsV (Cassava vein mosaic virus):TAF15b-GFP (ref. 42) constructs were previously described.

To generate pFRI:FRI-mScarlet I, the same FRI genomic sequence from H51 (ref. 10) was used as a template and mScarlet I sequence was inserted to the XbaI site over FRI stop codon in pBluescript KS (+). The FRI-mScarlet I fragment was then subcloned into SLJ699940. For pFRI:FRI-Col-0-GFP, an equivalent FRI genomic sequence from Col-0 was amplified10 and the GFP sequence was fused before the premature stop codon (after 1,335 bp downstream from ATG, equivalent to 314 amino acids). For pFRI:FRI-DD-GFP, the C-terminal disordered domain (DD) from 1,833 bp downstream from ATG to the stop codon (equivalent to 451 to 609 amino acids) was deleted. For pFRI:FRI-CC-GFP, two fragments encoding the coiled-coil domains (CC) are deleted: the first spans 118 bp to 300 bp downstream from ATG (equivalent to 40 to 100 amino acids) and the second is from 1,680 bp to 1,832 bp downstream from ATG (equivalent to 400 to 451 amino acids). For pFRL1:FRL1-mScarlet I, a 3,972-bp fragment containing FRL1 genomic sequence from Col-0 was amplified. It includes 1,502 bp upstream from FRL1 ATG and 1,057 bp downstream from FRL1 TAG. mScarlet I sequence was inserted before the TAG translational stop codon. FRI-Col-0-GFP, FRI-DD-GFP, FRI-CC-GFP and FRL1-mScarlet I DNA fragments were then cloned into the SLJ7551540 destination vector by Gateway Cloning. Plasmids were transformed into A. tumefaciens C58 (pGV2260) for infiltration of Nicotiana benthamiana21. All primers used for construction are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

IP–MS analyses

The IP–MS analyses were performed as described previously21,36. For the first experiment (IP1) 2.5 g of seedlings was cross-linked in 1% formaldehyde as previously described43. For the second (IP2) and third experiment (IP3), the amount of plant material used was doubled. Cross-linked plants were ground into fine powder and lysed in 50 ml of cell lysis buffer (20 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5, 250 mM sucrose, 25% glycerol, 20 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% NP-40, 5 mM DTT). The lysate was filtered through two layers of Miracloth (Merck, D00172956) and pelleted by centrifugation. The pellets were washed twice with 10 ml of nuclear wash buffer (20 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 25% glycerol, 0.3% Triton X-100, 5 mM DTT) and resuspended with RIPA buffer (1× PBS, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS). All the buffers were supplemented with 0.1 U μl−1 RNaseOUT (Invitrogen, 10777019), 1 mM PMSF and Roche Complete tablets to keep the integrity of any RNA–protein and protein–protein complex. Nuclear lysate was sonicated three times (Diagenode Bioruptor; M level, 30 s ON–30 s OFF, 5 min each time) and nuclear supernatant was obtained after centrifuge. GFP–Trap magnetic agarose beads (25 μl) (Chromotek, GTMA-20) were pre-blocked with 1 mg ml−1 BSA and 1 mg ml−1 yeast total RNA (Sigma) in RIPA buffer for 1 h at 4 °C and incubated with the nuclear supernatant for 2 h at 4 °C. Beads were sequentially washed twice with high-salt wash buffer and low-salt wash buffer (20 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5, 500 mM (high-salt) or 150 mM NaCl (low-salt), 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS and 1% Triton X-100). The beads were finally resuspended in 1× SDS loading buffer and boiled at 95 °C for 15 min to reverse cross-linking. The protein samples were purified from 10% SDS–PAGE gels followed by trypsin digestion. For LCMS analysis, an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with an UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano LC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used. Data were searched using Mascot server 2.7 (Matrix Science). Results were imported and evaluated in Scaffold 4.10.0 software (Proteome Software).

RNA expression analysis

RNA was extracted with the hot phenol method5,36. Genomic DNA contamination was removed by TURBO DNA-free kit (Invitrogen, AM1907) following the manufacturer’s guidelines. cDNA was synthesized by the SuperScript IV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, 18090050) using gene-specific reverse primers. All primers are listed in Supplementary Table 2. The TAIR (The Arabidopsis Information Resource) accession numbers for the genes analysed in this study are FRI (AT4G00650), FLC (AT5G10140) and COOLAIR (AT5G01675). Standard reference genes PP2A (AT1G13320) and UBC (AT5G25760) for gene expression were used for normalization4. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel (v.2102, 64-bit) and GraphPad Prism 7.

Microscopy and image quantification

The seedlings used for imaging were grown in the following conditions: NV, plants were grown in warm conditions for 7 days; 1WV, plants were grown in warm conditions for 6 days before being transferred to cold conditions for 1 week; 2WV or 4WV, plants were grown in cold conditions for 2 or 4 weeks with a 5-day pre-growth in warm conditions; before a short cold treatment (12 h or shorter), plants were grown in warm conditions for 7 days, so that all of the seedlings imaged are developmentally equivalent to a 7-day-old warm-grown seedling. The warm and cold conditions are the same as described in ‘Plant material and growth conditions’ unless otherwise stated.

The subcellular localization of FRI–GFP in root tips and first true leaves (Extended Data Figs. 2a, b, 8f) was imaged on a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope using a 40×/1.2 water objective and GAsP spectral detector array. The seedlings were kept intact during imaging. GFP was excited at 488 nm (Argon ion laser, laser power: 5.0 %) and detected at wavelengths of 491–695 nm in lambda mode. Linear unmixing projection in ZEN Black (2012) software was applied and the autofluorescence detected at 526–695 nm was unmixed and labelled as background (blue). Images were exported by ZEN Blue (2012).

For quantitative analysis of FRI–GFP and FCA–GFP nuclear condensates, imaging was performed on a Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope using a 40×/1.1 water objective and GAsP spectral detector array. GFP was excited at 488 nm (Argon ion laser, laser power: 5.0 %) and detected at wavelengths of 499–525 nm in lambda mode. An optimal z-step size of 0.61 μm was used over a total depth of 10.37 μm from the upper surface (18 z-slices) and maximum intensity projection was applied for the z-stack. A binary image of just the spots was then created through threshold in Fiji (ImageJ) and the spot area was subsequently measured by Analyze Particles in Fiji (ImageJ). As all images were obtained with a 0.11 μm pixel size, the area of a single pixel is 0.0121 μm2. To exclude single pixels, 0.02 μm2 was set as the minimum size during the analysis. The spot number (with area larger than 0.02 μm2) per nucleus was gained through displaying the spot outline generated by Analyze Particles in the original image. Violin plots reflecting the data distribution were produced with PlotsOfData44. Statistical evaluations with multiple comparisons tests were performed using the GraphPad Prism 7 software.

To compare the fluorescence intensity between roots, imaging was performed with a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope using an EC Plan-Neofluar 20×/0.50 objective. To allow comparison between treatments, the same settings were used for all images. Measurement of the fluorescence intensity was conducted with Fiji (ImageJ) with the intensity normalized to the background for each image. To collect the total intensity of each root tip, sum slices projections from a z-stack of 16 steps with a step size of 2 μm were applied before analysis.

FRAP

FRAP of FRI–GFP nuclear condensates was performed as described45 with a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope coupled with a Linkam Heating and Cooling Stage (Meyer instruments). A chamber was created on slides using Grace Bio-Labs Secure Seal adhesive sheets (Sigma, GBL620001) and filled with MS medium. The 2WV FRI-GFP seedlings were carefully transferred into the chamber with stage temperature kept at 4 °C. Using a 40×/1.2 water objective, the region of an FRI–GFP nuclear condensate was bleached using a laser intensity of 100% at 488 nm. Recovery was recorded for every 2 min for a total of 20 min after bleaching. At each time point, maximum intensity projections from a z-stack of 12 steps with a step size of 1 μm were applied. Analysis of the recovery curves was carried out with Fiji (ImageJ), Microsoft Excel (v.2102, 64-bit) and GraphPad Prism 7.

Time-lapse imaging

The time-lapse microscopy of FRI–GFP nuclear condensates was performed with a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope coupled with a Linkam Heating and Cooling Stage (Meyer instruments). For Supplementary Video 1, 1WV seedlings were transferred into a same chamber as in FRAP experiment and observed under a 40×/1.2 water objective. GFP was excited at 488 nm (Argon ion laser, laser power: 5.0 %) and detected at wavelengths of 490–551 nm. The temperature was first set at 4 °C and images were acquired every 15 or 20 min for 5 h after the temperature rose to 22 °C. At each time point, maximum intensity projections from a z-stack of 12 steps with a step size of 1 μm were applied. For Supplementary Video 2, 1WV seedlings were imaged after being grown in warm conditions (20 °C) for 3 h with the stage temperature kept at 4 °C, and images were acquired every 20 min for 6 h. The same imaging settings were used as in Supplementary Video 1. Images were processed and FRI–GFP nuclear condensates were quantified with Fiji (ImageJ).

Cycloheximide and MG132 treatment

Cycloheximide (CHX) and MG132 treatment were according to a previous study39. Before treatment, plants were grown on MS agar plates as described above. For treatment, seedlings were carefully transferred to new MS agar plates supplemented with either 100 μM CHX (C1988, Sigma-Aldrich) or 100 μM MG132 (474787, Sigma-Aldrich) growing for 24 h. In parallel, the same seedlings were transferred to new MS agar plates supplemented with the same amount of solvent (ethanol for CHX and dimethyl sulfoxide for MG132) as a control. Root tips were then imaged with a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope using a 40×/1.2 water objective. GFP was excited at 488 nm (Argon ion laser, laser power: 20.0 %) and detected at wavelengths of 489–530 nm. An optimal z-step size of 0.435 μm was used over a total depth of 11.75 μm from the upper surface (28 z-slices). Images were processed and measurements were conducted with Fiji (ImageJ). Sum slices projection was applied for the z-stack. The whole nuclear intensity was measured and normalized to background in each image before comparison. All images were obtained with a 0.1-μm pixel size and 0.02 μm2 was set as the minimum size during the analysis of FRI–GFP nuclear condensates. Statistical evaluations with multiple comparisons tests were performed using the GraphPad Prism software.

smFISH and immunofluorescence

smFISH and immunofluorescence was performed as previously described26,46. Plants were grown in warm conditions for seven days (NV) or in cold conditions for two weeks with a five-day pre-growth in warm conditions (2WV). For FRI–GFP fluorescence microscopy with sequential smFISH, root tips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) before being squashed. After permeabilization in 70% ethanol for 1 h, the subnuclear localization of FRI–GFP was imaged and the stage positions were saved at the microscope. Next, cover slips were carefully unmounted and FLC intron 1 or COOLAIR intron probes labelled with Quasar 570 were hybridized at 37 °C overnight. The probes were the same as previously described26,27. The probe signals were detected using the same stage positions as FRI–GFP. The microscope used was Zeiss Elyra PS with a 100×/1.46 oil-immersion objective and a cooled electron multiplying CCD (charge-coupled device) Andor iXon 897 camera. GFP was exited at 488 nm and detected at wavelengths of 495–550 nm; probes labelled with Quasar 570 were excited at 561 nm and detected at 570–620 nm; DAPI was excited at 405 nm and detected at 420–480 nm. An optimal z-step size of 0.2 μm was used over a total depth of 2.4 μm (23 z-slices) and maximum intensity projection was applied for the z-stack using Fiji (ImageJ).

For FRI–Myc immunofluorescence and colocalization of FRI–GFP and U2B′′, squashed root cells were immersed in 70% ethanol overnight at 4 °C for permeabilization. Cell walls were digested with 0.2% Driselase (Sigma, D9515) and 0.15% Macerozyme R-10 (Duchefa Biochemie, M8002) in 1× PBS at 37 °C for 40 min. After being washed three times with 1× PBST, cells were blocked with 2.5% BSA (Thermo Fisher Scientific, AM2616). Primary antibodies: 1: 125 diluted anti-c-Myc (Sigma, M5546), 1: 500 diluted anti-GFP (Abcam, ab290) and 1: 20 diluted anti-U2B′′ (4G3, a gift from P. Shaw) were incubated at 37 °C for 3–4 h. Alexa Fluor 488 anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11008, dilution: 1:200) and Alexa Fluor 555 anti-mouse secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-21424, dilution: 1:200) were incubated for 1 h. After DAPI staining, slides were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Lab, H-1000). Images were acquired on a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope using a 63×/1.40 oil objective. For FRI–Myc immunofluorescence, DAPI was excited at 405 nm and detected at 410–513 nm; FRI–Myc-Alexa Fluor 555 was excited at 514 nm and detected at 545–697 nm. For FRI–GFP and U2B′′ colocalization, DAPI was excited at 405 nm and detected at 407–489 nm; FRI–GFP–Alexa Fluor 488 was excited at 488 nm and detected at 491–561 nm; U2B′′–Alexa Fluor 555 was excited at 561 nm and detected at 562–634 nm.

GUS staining

FLC–GUS staining was performed as previously described35. Whole seedlings were vacuum-infiltrated with GUS staining buffer (1 mM X-gluc (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl glucuronide), 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM ferricyanide and ferrocyanide, pH was finally adjusted to 7.0) followed by an overnight or shorter incubation at 37 °C. Whole seedlings and roots were immediately imaged after de-staining with 95% ethanol.

ChIP and quantitative PCR

FRI–GFP ChIP was performed as previously outlined with some modifications1,36. Five grams of NV seedlings and 2.5 g of 2WV seedlings were cross-linked in 1% formaldehyde and nuclei were purified and lysed as in the IP–MS experiment. Anti-GFP (Abcam, ab290, dilution: 1:400) and protein A agarose beads containing salmon sperm DNA (Millipore, 16-157) were used in the immunoprecipitation. The enriched DNA was purified using the ChIP DNA Clean & Concentrator Kit (Zymo Research, D5205)43. All ChIP experiments were quantified by quantitative PCR (qPCR) with appropriate primers (Supplementary Table 2). The enrichment levels of FRI–GFP at ACTIN (ACT) and SHOOT MERISTEMLESS (STM) were used as controls. A transgene carrying a wild-type FLC crossed with FRI–GFP was used as control for FRI–GFP ChIP in TEX.

Western blot analysis

For checking FRI–GFP enrichment in the ChIP experiment, beads were directly boiled in 1×SDS loading buffer at 95 °C for 15 min after immunoprecipitation. For detecting FRI–GFP and FRI–TAP protein levels in NV, 2WV and 4WV plants, nuclei were purified with the same protocol of IP–MS but from 0.3 g of non-cross-linked seedlings. Whole seedlings were grounded and lysed to get total protein extraction for detecting FRI–GFP protein levels in 35S:FRI-GFP plants. ChIP elution and the extracted nuclear and total proteins were separated on NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris protein gel (Invitrogen, NP0321BOX) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Antibodies against GFP (Roche, 11814460001, dilution: 1:2,000), TAP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CAB1001, dilution: 1:1,000), H3 (Abcam, ab1791, dilution: 1:5,000) and tubulin (Merck Sigma-Aldrich, T5168, dilution: 1:4,000) were used as primary antibodies. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies: anti-mouse IgG (GE, NA931, dilution: 1:20,000) and anti-rabbit IgG (GE, NA934, dilution: 1:20,000) were used for protein detection with chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 34095). Western blot signal was captured in ImageQuant LAS 500.

RNA-IP assay

Five grams of NV seedlings and 2.5 g of 2WV seedlings were used for each immunoprecipitation. Nuclei were extracted and purified from cross-linked plant material with the same procedure as in the IP–MS experiment. The pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of nuclear lysis buffer (50 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 mM CaCl2) and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min with Turbo DNase (Invitrogen, AM1907)47. Then SDS was added to a final concentration of 0.1% and NaCl to 150 mM. Following another hour incubation at 4 °C, nuclear lysate was cleared by centrifugation. A 100-μm quantity of the supernatant was saved as the input. Twenty-five microlitres of pre-blocked GFP–Trap magnetic agarose beads (Chromotek, GTMA-20) were incubated with the nuclear supernatant following the same immunoprecipitation and wash procedure as in IP–MS experiment. All the buffers used were supplemented with 0.1 U μl−1 RNaseOUT (Invitrogen, 10777019), 1 mM PMSF and Roche Complete tablets. Then RNA was eluted and purified as previously described21. After another DNA digestion with Turbo DNase, reverse transcription with gene specific primers was performed by SuperScript IV reverse transcriptase. Primers for reverse transcription and qPCR are listed in Supplementary Table 2. RNA enrichment was analysed in Microsoft Excel (v.2102, 64-bit) and GraphPad Prism 7. RNA enriched in NV FRI-GFP was normalized to NV FRI whereas 2WV FRI-GFP was normalized to 2WV FRI to reduce any possible influence from COOLAIR expression variation.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.

Data availability

Full lists of mass spectrometry are provided as Supplementary Table 1. Raw images of western blots are provided as Supplementary Fig. 1. Other raw images that support the findings of this study are available at https://doi.org/10.11922/sciencedb.01119Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Yang, H. et al. Distinct phases of Polycomb silencing to hold epigenetic memory of cold in Arabidopsis. Science 357, 1142–1145 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Buzas, D. M., Robertson, M., Finnegan, E. J. & Helliwell, C. A. Transcription-dependence of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation at the Arabidopsis polycomb target gene FLC. Plant J. 65, 872–881 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hepworth, J. et al. Absence of warmth permits epigenetic memory of winter in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 9, 639–639 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Antoniou-Kourounioti, R. L. et al. Temperature sensing is distributed throughout the regulatory network that controls FLC epigenetic silencing in vernalization. Cell Syst. 7, 643–655 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Csorba, T., Questa, J. I., Sun, Q. & Dean, C. Antisense COOLAIR mediates the coordinated switching of chromatin states at FLC during vernalization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16160–16165 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yang, H., Howard, M. & Dean, C. Antagonistic roles for H3K36me3 and H3K27me3 in the cold-induced epigenetic switch at Arabidopsis FLC. Curr. Biol. 24, 1793–1797 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jiang, D., Gu, X. & He, Y. Establishment of the winter-annual growth habit via FRIGIDA-mediated histone methylation at FLOWERING LOCUS C in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 1733–1746 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Choi, K. et al. The FRIGIDA complex activates transcription of FLC, a strong flowering repressor in Arabidopsis, by recruiting chromatin modification factors. Plant Cell 23, 289–303 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Li, Z., Jiang, D. & He, Y. FRIGIDA establishes a local chromosomal environment for FLOWERING LOCUS C mRNA production. Nat. Plants 4, 836–846 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Johanson, U. et al. Molecular analysis of FRIGIDA, a major determinant of natural variation in Arabidopsis flowering time. Science 290, 344–347 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Swiezewski, S., Liu, F., Magusin, A. & Dean, C. Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature 462, 799–802 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hemsley, P. A. et al. The Arabidopsis mediator complex subunits MED16, MED14, and MED2 regulate mediator and RNA polymerase II recruitment to CBF-responsive cold-regulated genes. Plant Cell 26, 465–484 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yang, Y., Li, L. & Qu, L. J. Plant Mediator complex and its critical functions in transcription regulation. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 58, 106–118 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yun, J. Y., Tamada, Y., Kang, Y. E. & Amasino, R. M. Arabidopsis trithorax-related3/SET domain GROUP2 is required for the winter-annual habit of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 53, 834–846 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    He, Y., Doyle, M. R. & Amasino, R. M. PAF1-complex-mediated histone methylation of FLOWERING LOCUS C chromatin is required for the vernalization-responsive, winter-annual habit in Arabidopsis. Gene Dev. 18, 2774–2784 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Guan, Q. et al. A DEAD box RNA helicase is critical for pre-mRNA splicing, cold-responsive gene regulation, and cold tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 342–356 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Du, J. L. et al. The splicing factor PRP31 is involved in transcriptional gene silencing and stress response in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 8, 1053–1068 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Collier, S. et al. A distant coilin homologue is required for the formation of Cajal bodies in Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 2942–2951 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sabari, B. R., Dall’Agnese, A. & Young, R. A. Biomolecular condensates in the nucleus. Trends Biochem. Sci. 45, 961–977 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bienz, M. Head-to-tail polymerization in the assembly of biomolecular condensates. Cell 182, 799–811 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Fang, X. et al. Arabidopsis FLL2 promotes liquid–liquid phase separation of polyadenylation complexes. Nature 569, 265–269 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Machyna, M., Heyn, P. & Neugebauer, K. M. Cajal bodies: where form meets function. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 4, 17–34 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Risk, J. M., Laurie, R. E., Macknight, R. C. & Day, C. L. FRIGIDA and related proteins have a conserved central domain and family specific N- and C- terminal regions that are functionally important. Plant Mol. Biol. 73, 493–505 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hu, X. et al. Proteasome-mediated degradation of FRIGIDA modulates flowering time in Arabidopsis during vernalization. Plant Cell 26, 4763–4781 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Riback, J. A. et al. Composition-dependent thermodynamics of intracellular phase separation. Nature 581, 209–214 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rosa, S., Duncan, S. & Dean, C. Mutually exclusive sense–antisense transcription at FLC facilitates environmentally induced gene repression. Nat. Commun. 7, 13031–13031 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ietswaart, R., Rosa, S., Wu, Z., Dean, C. & Howard, M. Cell-size-dependent transcription of FLC and its antisense long non-coding RNA COOLAIR explain cell-to-cell expression variation. Cell Syst. 4, 622–635 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Henninger, J. E. et al. RNA-mediated feedback control of transcriptional condensates. Cell 184, 207–225 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zavaliev, R., Mohan, R., Chen, T. & Dong, X. Formation of NPR1 condensates promotes cell survival during the plant immune response. Cell 182, 1093–1108 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Powers, S. K. et al. Nucleo-cytoplasmic partitioning of ARF proteins controls auxin responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cell 76, 177–190 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hahm, J., Kim, K., Qiu, Y. & Chen, M. Increasing ambient temperature progressively disassembles Arabidopsis phytochrome B from individual photobodies with distinct thermostabilities. Nat. Commun. 11, 1660–1660 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Michaels, S. D., Bezerra, I. C. & Amasino, R. M. FRIGIDA-related genes are required for the winter-annual habit in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3281–3285 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Andersson, C. R. et al. The FLX gene of Arabidopsis is required for FRI-dependent activation of FLC expression. Plant Cell Physiol. 49, 191–200 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kim, S., Choi, K., Park, C., Hwang, H. J. & Lee, I. SUPPRESSOR OF FRIGIDA4, encoding a C2H2-type zinc finger protein, represses flowering by transcriptional activation of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS C. Plant Cell 18, 2985–2998 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Angel, A., Song, J., Dean, C. & Howard, M. A Polycomb-based switch underlying quantitative epigenetic memory. Nature 476, 105–108 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Questa, J. I., Song, J., Geraldo, N., An, H. & Dean, C. Arabidopsis transcriptional repressor VAL1 triggers Polycomb silencing at FLC during vernalization. Science 353, 485–488 (2016).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Crevillén, P. and Dean, C. Regulation of the floral repressor gene FLC: the complexity of transcription in a chromatin context. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14, 38–44 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    He, Y., Chen, T. and Zeng, X. Genetic and epigenetic understanding of the seasonal timing of flowering. Plant Commun. 1, 100008 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhao, Y., Antoniou-Kourounioti, R. L., Calder, G., Dean, C. & Howard, M. Temperature-dependent growth contributes to long-term cold sensing. Nature 583, 825–829 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jones, J. D. et al. Effective vectors for transformation, expression of heterologous genes, and assaying transposon excision in transgenic plants. Transgenic Res. 1, 285–297 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Li, Y. et al. The SNW domain of SKIP is required for its integration into the spliceosome and its interaction with the Paf1 complex in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 9, 1040–1050 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Eom, H. et al. TAF15b, involved in the autonomous pathway for flowering, represses transcription of FLOWERING LOCUS C. Plant J. 93, 79–91 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Zhu, P. et al. Arabidopsis small nucleolar RNA monitors the efficient pre-rRNA processing during ribosome biogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11967–11972 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Postma, M. & Goedhart, J. PlotsOfData—a web app for visualizing data together with their summaries. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000202 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Rosa, S. Measuring dynamics of histone proteins by photobleaching in Arabidopsis roots. Methods Mol. Biol. 1675, 455–465 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Duncan, S., Olsson, T. S. G., Hartley, M., Dean, C. & Rosa, S. Single molecule RNA FISH in Arabidopsis root cells. Bio-protocol 7, e2240 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ariel, F. et al. Noncoding transcription by alternative RNA polymerases dynamically regulates an auxin-driven chromatin loop. Mol. Cell 55, 383–396 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Torney for generating the FRI-Myc transgenic line; R. Ishikawa and J. Questa for generating the frl1-1 FRI, flx-2 FRI and suf4 FRI genotypes; P. Shaw for the gift of the U2B′′ antibody; I. Lee and H. Kang for the TAF15b-GFP plasmids; L. Ma for the GFP-ELF7 plasmid; Y. Li for initial observations with FRI–GFP microscopy; G. Calder for image analysis expertise; C. Xu for technical assistance on smRNA FISH and immunostaining; X. Fang for constant discussion; and the laboratories of C.D. and M. Howard for critical input and reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Institute Strategic Program GEN (BB/P013511/1), a Royal Society Professorship to C.D., an EPSRC Physics of Life grant (EP/T00214X/1) and a European Research Council Advanced Investigator grant (EPISWITCH- 833254).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.Z. and C.D. conceived the study and wrote the manuscript. P.Z. performed most of the experiments and all of the data analysis. C.L. generated the FRI-GFP, FRI-TAP and 35S: FRI-GFP transgenic lines and performed the FLC–GUS staining. C.D. obtained funding and supervised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Dean.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Chris Helliwell, Salomé Prat and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Transgenic FRI-GFP is functionally equivalent to endogenous FRI.

ad, Relative expression level of FRI mRNA (a), unspliced FLC (b), spliced FLC (c) and total COOLAIR (d) in Col-0 plants with introgressive FRI (FRI) or transgenic FRI-GFP with its endogenous promoter, measured by RT–qPCR. Plants were given no cold (non-vernalization, NV) or 2 weeks of cold (2 weeks of vernalization, 2WV). Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. of three independent biological replicates. e, f, Photographs showing flowering phenotype of Col-0 (fri), FRI-GFP and FRI plants in the warm (NV) or after 5 weeks of cold exposure (5WV). Scale bars, 5 cm.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Cold promotes FRI nuclear condensates in both root and leaf cells.

a, Single confocal images of NV and 2WV Arabidopsis root tip nuclei expressing FRI–GFP (green) with 2WV non-tagged FRI as a negative control. Data are represented of three independent experiments. b, Confocal images of 2WV Arabidopsis leaf nuclei expressing FRI–GFP (green). Maximum intensity projections of Z-stacks spanning the entire width of the nucleus were applied. Autofluorescence was unmixed with lambda mode (blue) (see Methods). a, b, Scale bars, 10 μm. c, d, Quantification of FRI–GFP nuclear condensate area (c) and number per nucleus (d) in root cells in Fig. 1a. An open circle indicates the median of the data and a vertical bar indicates the 95% confidence interval (CI) determined by bootstrapping. n= 391 (NV), 904 (1WV) and 494 (2WV) condensates (c) and n=181 (NV), 144 (1WV) and 130 (2WV) nuclei (d). More than 10 plants were analysed. Comparison of mean by two-way ANOVA with adjustment (Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). ns, no significance. e, f, Representative confocal immunofluorescence images of subnuclear localization of FRI–Myc (red) in NV (e) and 2WV (f) Arabidopsis root cells. Non-tagged FRI was used as a negative control. DNA was stained by DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 5 μm. g, Confocal images of Arabidopsis root tip nuclei expressing FCA–GFP after 1 week (1WV) and 2 weeks (2WV) of cold treatment. Maximum intensity projections of Z-stacks spanning the entire width of the nucleus were applied. Scale bars, 5 μm. h, i, Quantification of FCA–GFP nuclear condensate area (h) and number per nucleus (i) in root cells. An open circle indicates the median of the data and a vertical bar indicates the 95% confidence interval (CI) determined by bootstrapping. Numbers of nuclear condensates measured in (h) were 655 (NV), 839 (1WV) and 613 (2WV). Numbers of nuclei analysed in (i) were 163 (NV), 148 (1WV) and 126 (2WV). At least 10 plants in each condition were analysed. Comparison of mean by one-way ANOVA with adjustment (Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). ns, no significance.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 FRI associates with FRL1, TAF15b and U2B′′ in nuclear condensates in vivo.

a, Confocal microscopic images of tobacco leaf nuclei with expression of FRI–mScarlet I or FRL1–mScarlet I alone or co-expression of both. Data are representative of 5 independent experiments. b, c, Quantification of FRI–mScarlet I nuclear condensate area (b) and number per nucleus (c) in tobacco leaf with or without FRL1–mScarlet I co-expressed. An open circle indicates the median of the data and a vertical bar indicates the 95% confidence interval (CI) determined by bootstrapping. Numbers of nuclear condensates measured in (b) were 204 (FRI), 0 (FRL1) and 320 (FRI+FRL1). Numbers of nuclei analysed in (c) were 15 (FRI), 16 (FRL1) and 20 (FRI+FRL1). Comparison of mean by one-way ANOVA with adjustment (Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). ns, no significance. d, Confocal microscopic images of FRI–GFP nuclear condensates in the indicated mutants. e, f, Quantification of FRI–GFP nuclear condensate area (e) and number per nucleus (f) in the indicated genotypes. An open circle indicates the median of the data and a vertical bar indicates the 95% confidence interval (CI) determined by bootstrapping. Numbers of nuclear condensates measured in (e) were (from left to right) 391, 904, 159, 437, 324, 735, 354 and 448. Numbers of nuclei analysed in (f) were (from left to right) 181, 144, 96, 105, 132, 177, 142 and 126. At least 10 plants were analysed. Comparison of mean by one-way ANOVA with adjustment (Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). ns, no significance. g, Confocal microscopic images of tobacco leaf nuclei expressing FRI–mScarlet I and TAF15b–GFP. TAF15b–GFP was driven either by its endogenous protomer or overexpressed with CSV promoter. Data are representative of 3 independent experiments. h, Immunostaining images showing relative subnuclear localization of FRI–GFP (green) to U2B′′ (red) in root cells in NV and 2WV conditions. DNA was labelled with DAPI (blue). Non-tagged FRI was used a negative control. i, j, Quantification of the total number of U2B′′ condensates per nucleus (i) and those colocalized with FRI–GFP condensates (j) in NV and 2WV conditions. An open circle indicates the median of the data and a vertical bar indicates the 95% confidence interval (CI) determined by bootstrapping. n=166 nuclei (NV) and 130 nuclei (2WV). Comparison was via two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction. ns, no significance. In all the images, scale bars, 5 μm.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 The protein domains required for in vivo FRI condensate formation.

a, Prediction of intrinsically disordered regions in FRI protein by IUPred2A. A schematic illustration of FRI domains was shown below. DD, disordered domain, CC, coiled-coil domain and the central domain was in grey. b, Schematic illustration of full-length FRI, C-terminal disordered domain deleted FRI (FRI-DD), coiled-coil domain deleted FRI (FRI-CC) and FRI encoded in Col-0 (FRI-Col-0). The mutated amino acids in FRI-Col-0 were indicated10. c, Subnuclear localization of full-length and truncated FRI–GFP in tobacco leaf nuclei. Images are representative of three independent experiments. Scale bars, 5 μm.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Stability of FRI–GFP is increased in the cold.

a, Nuclear FRI–GFP protein level in NV, 2WV and 4WV FRI–GFP transgenic plants as determined by western blots. Non-tagged FRI was used as a negative control. H3 was used as nuclear protein loading control. Data are representative of two independent experiments. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. b, c, Confocal microscopy images of FRI–GFP in root tips of NV, 2WV and 4WV FRI–GFP transgenic plants (b) and the quantification of the fluorescence signal (c). Scale bars, 50 μm. The fluorescence intensity in cold treated samples is normalized to NV samples. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m.; n=15 (NV), 12 (2WV) and 13 (4WV) roots. Statistical analysis was via one-way ANOVA with adjustment (Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). d, Nuclear FRI–TAP protein level in NV, 2WV and 4WV plants expressing FRI–TAP as determined by western blots. Non-tagged FRI was used as a negative control. Asterisks indicate non-specific signals. Data are representative of two independent experiments. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. e, Confocal microscopy of Arabidopsis root tip nuclei expressing FRI–GFP in NV or 2WV plants after treated with cycloheximide (CHX) in the indicated conditions for 24 h. For example, “NV in the cold” means plants grown in NV were kept in the cold for the 24h CHX treatment. Scale bars, 5 μm. f, Quantification of nuclear fluorescence intensity in (e). The relative intensity of CHX+ to CHX- in each treatment was indicated by percentage on top. n = 136, 122, 95, 107, 144, 153, 141 and 105 root nuclei (from left to right). g, h, Box plots showing the distribution of FRI–GFP nuclear condensate area and number in (e). Numbers of nuclear condensates measured in (g) were 226, 0, 138, 46, 270, 0, 282 and 238 (from left to right) and numbers of nuclei analysed in (h) were 113, 127, 66, 80, 94, 185, 95 and 85 (from left to right). fh, At least 10 plants were analysed. Centre lines show median, box edges delineate 25th and 75th percentiles, bars extend to minimum and maximum values and ‘+’ indicates the mean value. Mean was compared by one-way ANOVA with adjustment (Sidak’s multiple comparisons test).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 FRI–GFP in 35S: FRI-GFP, frl1-1, flx-2 and suf4.

a, Relative transcript level of FRI mRNA in the indicated plants measured by RT–qPCR. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. of three independent biological replicates. Mean was compared by two-way ANOVA with adjustment (Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). ns, no significance. b, c, Total FRI–GFP protein level in the indicated plants as determined by western blots. A non-specific band (b) or ponceau staining (c) was used as loading control. Data are representative of two independent experiments. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. d, e, Confocal microscopic images (d) and quantification of GFP fluorescence signal (e) of root tips expressing 35S: FRI-GFP. Scale bars, 50 μm. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m., n = 13 (NV), 12 (1WV), 14 (2WV) and 14 (4WV) roots. f, Total FRI–GFP protein level in NV or 2WV 35S: FRI-GFP plants after treated with cycloheximide (CHX) in the indicated conditions for 24 h as determined by western blots. For example, “2WV in the warm” means plants after 2 weeks of cold exposure were kept in the warm condition for the 24h CHX treatment. Plants were initially grown in growth medium without glucose (see Methods) then were transferred to medium without (0%) (top) or with 1% glucose (bottom) for the 24h CHX treatment. Tubulin was used as control. Data are representative of two independent experiments. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. g, Confocal microscopy of root tip nuclei in 35S: FRI-GFP plants (middle) with 35S: GFP (right) and NV FRI-GFP (left) as control. Maximum intensity projections of Z-stacks spanning the entire width of a nucleus were applied. Scale bars, 5 μm. Images represent 8 independent experiments. h, i, Box plots showing the distribution of FRI–GFP nuclear condensate area and number in (g). Centre lines show median, box edges delineate 25th and 75th percentiles, bars extend to minimum and maximum values and ‘+’ indicates the mean value. n = 114, 1185, 1543, 1276 and 1412 nuclear condensates in (h) and 262, 222, 205, 207 and 216 root nuclei in (i) (from left to right) were analysed. Comparison of mean was via one-way ANOVA with adjustment (Sidak’s multiple comparisons test). ns, no significance. j, Expression of FRI-GFP in NV plants with the indicated genotype, measured by RT–qPCR. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. of three independent biological replicates. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis and P value was adjusted by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. ns, no significance. k, Representative confocal microscopic images of FRI–GFP root tips in 2WV plants with the indicated backgrounds. Scale bars, 50 μm. l, Quantification of the fluorescence intensity in (k). Data are represented as mean ± s.e.m., n = 14 (WT), 13 (frl1-1), 13 (flx-2) and 12 (suf4) roots. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis and P value was adjusted by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. ns, no significance.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 FRI occupancy on the FLC promoter is reduced in the cold and correlates with FLC transcriptional shutdown.

a, b, Spatial expression patterns of a translational FLC-GUS reporter in aerial parts (a) and root tips (b) of NV and 6WV plants in fri and FRI backgrounds. Scale bars, 1 mm (a) and 100 μm (b). Data represents two independent experiments. c, Schematic illustration of FLC and COOLAIR transcripts at the FLC locus. Untranslated regions (UTR) are indicated by grey boxes and exons by black boxes. kb, kilobase. d, FRI–GFP was detected after immunoprecipitation by western blots in ChIP experiments. Ponceau staining was used as the loading control. Data are representative of three independent experiments. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. e, f, FRI–GFP ChIP across the FLC locus (e), STM and ACT locus (f) in plants expressing FRI–GFP. Non-tagged FRI was used as negative control. The exact distance from TSS referred to (c). Data are represented as mean ± s.d. of three independent biological experiments with two technical repeats. Two-way ANOVA was performed with P values adjusted by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. g, Unspliced FLC transcript level in NV and 2WV plants with the indicated backgrounds, measured by RT–qPCR. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. of three biologically independent experiments. h, Representative images of nuclei expressing FRI–GFP (green) sequentially hybridized with intronic smFISH probes for COOLAIR (red). DNA was labelled with DAPI (blue). n= 327 cells. Scale bars, 5 μm. i, j, Relative transcript level of unspliced FLC and spliced FLC in the indicated plants measured by RT–qPCR. Data were presented as mean ± s.e.m. of three independent biological replicates. Two-way ANOVA was performed with P values adjusted by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. k, l, Relative transcript level of FRI mRNA and unspliced FLC in NV and 2WV plants with the indicated genotype, measured by RT–qPCR. Data were presented as mean ± s.e.m. of three biologically independent experiments (k) and with two technical repeats (l). Two-way ANOVA was performed with P values adjusted by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. m, FLC transcriptional shutdown rate indicated by -Slope by Linear Regression of unspliced FLC in (l). Mean ± s.e.m., n=6 replicates over 3 biologically independent experiments. P value was through two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 FRI–GFP nuclear condensate dynamics change in response to short-term temperature fluctuations.

a, b, Quantification of FRI–GFP nuclear condensate area (a) and number per nucleus (b) in WT and TEX root cells after 0, 6 and 12 h of cold treatment in Fig. 2a. Comparisons between 12 h of cold treatment (12H) and 2WV (same data shown in Extended Data Fig. 2c, d) were presented on the right. An open circle indicates the median of the data and a vertical bar indicates the 95% confidence interval (CI) determined by bootstrapping. n = 114, 380, 505, 180, 218, 346, 505 and 494 nuclear condensates in (a) and 262, 291, 303, 214, 205, 292, 303 and 130 root nuclei in (b) (from left to right). c, Fold change on Unspliced FLC transcript level in NV plants after transferred in cold for 12 h (12H) and 2 weeks (2WV) compared to NV. d, e, Quantification of FRI–GFP nuclear condensate area (d) and number per nucleus (e) in 2WV wildtype root cells after they were returned to warm for 0, 6, 12 and 24 h in Fig. 2c. An open circle indicates the median of the data and a vertical bar indicates the 95% confidence interval (CI) determined by bootstrapping. Numbers of nuclear condensates measured in (d) were 494 (0), 223 (6), 228 (12) and 292 (24) and numbers of root nuclei analysed in (e) were 130 (0), 109 (6), 152 (12) and 95 (24). At least 10 plants were analysed for each treatment. a-e, One-way ANOVA was performed with P values adjusted by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. ns, no significance. f, Confocal images of 2WV Arabidopsis leaf petiole nuclei expressing FRI–GFP (green) (left) and after transferred to warm conditions for 6 h (right). Maximum intensity projections of Z-stacks spanning the entire width of the nucleus were applied. Autofluorescence was unmixed with lambda mode (blue) (see Methods). Scale bars, 10 μm. Data are representative of three independent experiments. g, Confocal microscopy of Arabidopsis root tip nuclei expressing FRI–GFP after treated with MG132 in the indicated conditions for 6 h. Plants were exposed to 1 week of cold before (left). Scale bars, 5 μm. h, Quantification of nuclear fluorescence intensity in (g). Fluorescence intensity was normalized to control. n=127, 122 and 166 root nuclei. i, j, Box plot showing the distribution of FRI–GFP nuclear condensate area and number in (g). n= 227, 139 and 355 nuclear condensates in (i) and 81, 60 and 116 root nuclei in (j) (from left to right). hj, Centre lines show median, box edges delineate 25th and 75th percentiles, bars extend to minimum and maximum values and ‘+’ indicates the mean value. k, Fold change of Unspliced FLC expression level in 2WV plants after transferred in warm for 24 h (24H) and 10 days (10D) compared to NV. hk, One-way ANOVA was performed with P values adjusted by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. ns, no significance. l, m, Time-lapse microscopy of 1WV Arabidopsis root-tip nuclei expressing FRI–GFP after transfer to warm temperature (l) or return to cold temperature after a 3-hour warm spike (m). For each microscopic image maximum intensity projections of Z-stacks spanning the entire width of the nucleus were applied. Scale bars, 5 μm. Data are representative of two independent experiments. n, o, Quantitative measurement of the area (n) and number (o) of FRI–GFP nuclear condensates with an area ≥0.03 μm2 at each time point for the time-lapse experiment related to (m) and Supplementary Video 2. Data are represented as mean ± s.e.m., n = 22 nuclei. p, Confocal microscopic images of tobacco leaf nuclei expressing FRI–GFP and FRL1–mScarlet I before and after 24 h cold. Maximum intensity projections of Z-stacks spanning the entire width of the nucleus were applied. Scale bars, 5 μm. Three independent experiments gave similar results. q, r, Quantification of FRI–GFP nuclear condensate area (q) and number per nucleus (r) in tobacco leaf nuclei before and after 24 h of cold exposure. An open circle indicates the median of the data and a vertical bar indicates the 95% confidence interval (CI) determined by bootstrapping. n = 398 (warm) and 353 (cold) nuclear condensates (q) and 17 (warm) and 13 (cold) tobacco leaf nuclei (r). Two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction. ns, no significance.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 The association of FRI and COOLAIR is disturbed in FRI-complex mutants.

ac, Relative transcript level of spliced COOLAIR isoforms in NV and 2WV plants with the indicated genotype, measured by RT–qPCR. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. of three independent biological replicates. df, Fold change of spliced COOLAIR expression in 2WV plants relative to NV plants in the indicated backgrounds. Fold change of Class II.ii in 12 h cold treated plants (12H) relative to NV was compared to 2WV on the right in (f). Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. of three independent biological replicates. One-way ANOVA was performed with P values adjusted by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. ns, no significance. g, Schematic illustration of FLC and COOLAIR transcripts at the FLC locus. Untranslated regions (UTR) are indicated by grey boxes and exons by black boxes. kb, kilobase. h, RNA-IP assay of unspliced COOLAIR enriched by FRI–GFP in NV and 2WV plants. COOLAIR enrichment in FRI–GFP is normalized to non-tagged FRI. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. of three independent biological replicates. Although there are differences of the fold enrichment between NV and 2WV samples, no statistical significance was detected (two-way ANOVA). Class II.ii was shown as control. Amplicons for unspliced COOLAIR are shown in (g) by blue bars. i, RNA-IP assay of spliced COOLAIR enriched by FRI–GFP in 2WV plants in WT and frl1-1 backgrounds with UBC as control. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m. of three independent biological replicates. Two-way ANOVA with adjustment by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. ns, no significance. j, k, Quantification of FRI–GFP nuclear condensate area (j) and number per nucleus (k) in root cells in Fig. 3e. An open circle indicates the median of the data and a vertical bar indicates the 95% confidence interval (CI) determined by bootstrapping. Numbers of nuclear condensates measured in (j) were 114 (NV-WT), 142 (NV-TEX), 435 (2WV-WT) and 500 (2WV-TEX). Numbers of nuclei analysed in (k) were 262 (NV-WT), 214 (NV-TEX), 199 (2WV-WT) and 293 (2WVV-TEX). At least 10 plants were analysed for each treatment. One-way ANOVA with adjustment by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. ns, no significance. l, Representative confocal microscopic images of FRI–GFP root tips in 2WV WT and TEX plants. Scale bars, 50 μm. m, Quantification of the fluorescence intensity in (l). Data are represented as mean ± s.e.m., n=10 (WT) and 11 (TEX) roots. Two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction.

Source data

Extended Data Table 1 List of proteins identified by FRI–GFP affinity purification

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1

The original source images for the western blots.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

A complete list of proteins identified by IP–MS of FRI–GFP.

Supplementary Table 2

List of DNA oligos and PCR primers in this study.

Supplementary Video 1: Response of FRI–GFP nuclear condensates to warm temperature in live cells.

Time-lapse imaging of 1WV Arabidopsis root cells expressing FRI–GFP for 5 h after transfer to warm temperature. Time point is indicated on the top left, 00:00 indicates the time when the temperature was raised to 22 °C. Scale bar, 5 μm.

Supplementary Video 2: Response of FRI–GFP nuclear condensates to cold temperature in live cells.

Time-lapse imaging of 1WV Arabidopsis root cells expressing FRI–GFP for 6 h at cold temperature after a 3 h warm spike. Time point is indicated on the top left, 00:00 indicates the time when the temperature was lowered to 4 °C. Scale bar, 5 μm.

Peer Review File

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, P., Lister, C. & Dean, C. Cold-induced Arabidopsis FRIGIDA nuclear condensates for FLC repression. Nature 599, 657–661 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04062-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04062-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing