Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Signatures of Wigner crystal of electrons in a monolayer semiconductor

Abstract

When the Coulomb repulsion between electrons dominates over their kinetic energy, electrons in two-dimensional systems are predicted to spontaneously break continuous-translation symmetry and form a quantum crystal1. Efforts to observe2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 this elusive state of matter, termed a Wigner crystal, in two-dimensional extended systems have primarily focused on conductivity measurements on electrons confined to a single Landau level at high magnetic fields. Here we use optical spectroscopy to demonstrate that electrons in a monolayer semiconductor with density lower than 3 × 1011 per centimetre squared form a Wigner crystal. The combination of a high electron effective mass and reduced dielectric screening enables us to observe electronic charge order even in the absence of a moiré potential or an external magnetic field. The interactions between a resonantly injected exciton and electrons arranged in a periodic lattice modify the exciton bandstructure so that an umklapp resonance arises in the optical reflection spectrum, heralding the presence of charge order13. Our findings demonstrate that charge-tunable transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers14 enable the investigation of previously uncharted territory for many-body physics where interaction energy dominates over kinetic energy.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Optical signatures of a Wigner crystal at zero magnetic field and millikelvin temperatures.
Fig. 2: Phase transition between the Wigner crystal and electron liquid states at B = 0.
Fig. 3: Enhanced Wigner crystal signatures at B > 0.
Fig. 4: Theoretical analysis of magnetoroton scattering and Wigner crystal correlation length.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available at the ETH Research Collection (https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000478739).

References

  1. 1.

    Wigner, E. On the interaction of electrons in metals. Phys. Rev. 46, 1002–1011 (1934).

    ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lozovik, Y. E. & Yudson, V. I. Crystallization of a two-dimensional electron gas in a magnetic field. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. 22, 11–12 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Grimes, C. C. & Adams, G. Evidence for a liquid-to-crystal phase transition in a classical, two-dimensional sheet of electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 795–798 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Andrei, E. Y. et al. Observation of a magnetically induced Wigner solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2765–2768 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Goldman, V. J., Santos, M., Shayegan, M. & Cunningham, J. E. Evidence for two-dimentional quantum Wigner crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2189–2192 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Williams, F. I. B. et al. Conduction threshold and pinning frequency of magnetically induced Wigner solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3285–3288 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Buhmann, H. et al. Novel magneto-optical behavior in the Wigner-solid regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 926–929 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Goldys, E. M. et al. Magneto-optical probe of two-dimensional electron liquid and solid phases. Phys. Rev. B 46, 7957–7960 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ye, P. D. et al. Correlation lengths of the Wigner-crystal order in a two-dimensional electron system at high magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 176802 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chen, Y. P. et al. Melting of a 2D quantum electron solid in high magnetic field. Nat. Phys. 2, 452–455 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tiemann, L., Rhone, T. D., Shibata, N. & Muraki, K. NMR profiling of quantum electron solids in high magnetic fields. Nat. Phys. 10, 648–652 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Deng, H. et al. Commensurability oscillations of composite fermions induced by the periodic potential of a Wigner crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 096601 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shimazaki, Y. et al. Optical signatures of periodic charge distribution in a Mott-like correlated insulator state. Phys. Rev. X 11, 021027 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Xu, X., Yao, W., Xiao, D. & Heinz, T. F. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 10, 343–350 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Drummond, N. D. & Needs, R. J. Phase diagram of the low-density two-dimensional homogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 126402 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yoon, J., Li, C. C., Shahar, D., Tsui, D. C. & Shayegan, M. Wigner crystallization and metal–insulator transition of two-dimensional holes in GaAs at B = 0. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1744–1747 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shapir, I. et al. Imaging the electronic Wigner crystal in one dimension. Science 364, 870–875 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hossain, M. S. et al. Observation of spontaneous ferromagnetism in a two-dimensional electron system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 32244–32250 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zarenia, M., Neilson, D., Partoens, B. & Peeters, F. M. Wigner crystallization in transition metal dichalcogenides: a new approach to correlation energy. Phys. Rev. B 95, 115438 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Regan, E. C. et al. Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattices. Nature 579, 359–363 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tang, Y. et al. Simulation of Hubbard model physics in WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattices. Nature 579, 353–358 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Shimazaki, Y. et al. Strongly correlated electrons and hybrid excitons in a moiré heterostructure. Nature 580, 472–477 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang, L. et al. Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Mater. 19, 861–866 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Xu, Y. et al. Correlated insulating states at fractional fillings of moiré superlattices. Nature 587, 214–218 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Padhi, B., Chitra, R. & Phillips, P. W. Generalized Wigner crystallization in moiré materials. Phys. Rev. B 103, 125146 (2021).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Smoleński, T. et al. Interaction-induced Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations in optical conductivity of monolayer MoSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 097403 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sidler, M. et al. Fermi polaron-polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconductors. Nat. Phys. 13, 255–261 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Efimkin, D. K. & MacDonald, A. H. Many-body theory of trion absorption features in two-dimensional semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 95, 035417 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Direct observation of the transition from indirect to direct bandgap in atomically thin epitaxial MoSe2. Nat. Nanotech. 9, 111–115 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Larentis, S. et al. Large effective mass and interaction-enhanced Zeeman splitting of K-valley electrons in MoSe2. Phys. Rev. B 97, 201407 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Li, Y. et al. Valley splitting and polarization by the Zeeman effect in monolayer MoSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 266804 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Glazov, M. M. et al. Exciton fine structure and spin decoherence in monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 89, 201302 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Spivak, B., Kravchenko, S. V., Kivelson, S. A. & Gao, X. P. A. Transport in strongly correlated two dimensional electron fluids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1743–1766 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tešanović, Z., Axel, F. & Halperin, B. I. “Hall crystal” versus Wigner crystal. Phys. Rev. B 39, 8525–8551 (1989).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ruzin, I. M., Marianer, S. & Shklovskii, B. I. Pinning of a two-dimensional Wigner crystal by charged impurities. Phys. Rev. B 46, 3999–4008 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhu, X., Littlewood, P. B. & Millis, A. J. Sliding motion of a two-dimensional Wigner crystal in a strong magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 50, 4600–4621 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Fogler, M. M. & Huse, D. A. Dynamical response of a pinned two-dimensional Wigner crystal. Phys. Rev. B 62, 7553–7570 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chitra, R. & Giamarchi, T. Zero field Wigner crystal. Eur. Phys. J. B 44, 455–467 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Koulakov, A. A., Fogler, M. M. & Shklovskii, B. I. Charge density wave in two-dimensional electron liquid in weak magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 499–502 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bernu, B., Cândido, L. & Ceperley, D. M. Exchange frequencies in the 2D Wigner crystal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 870–873 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zomer, P. J., Guimarães, M. H. D., Brant, J. C., Tombros, N. & van Wees, B. J. Fast pick up technique for high quality heterostructures of bilayer graphene and hexagonal boron nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 013101 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Knüppel, P. et al. Nonlinear optics in the fractional quantum Hall regime. Nature 572, 91–94 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Back, P., Zeytinoglu, S., Ijaz, A., Kroner, M. & Imamoğlu, A. Realization of an electrically tunable narrow-bandwidth atomically thin mirror using monolayer MoSe2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 037401 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lee, S.-Y., Jeong, T.-Y., Jung, S. & Yee, K.-J. Refractive index dispersion of hexagonal boron nitride in the visible and near-infrared. Phys. Status Solidi B 256, 1800417 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Rah, Y., Jin, Y., Kim, S. & Yu, K. Optical analysis of the refractive index and birefringence of hexagonal boron nitride from the visible to near-infrared. Opt. Lett. 44, 3797–3800 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Srivastava, A. et al. Valley Zeeman effect in elementary optical excitations of monolayer WSe2. Nat. Phys. 11, 141–147 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Aivazian, G. et al. Magnetic control of valley pseudospin in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Phys. 11, 148–152 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kim, K. K. et al. Synthesis and characterization of hexagonal boron nitride film as a dielectric layer for graphene devices. ACS Nano 6, 8583–8590 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Laturia, A., Van de Put, M. L. & Vandenberghe, W. G. Dielectric properties of hexagonal boron nitride and transition metal dichalcogenides: from monolayer to bulk. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2, 6 (2018); correction 4, 28 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Monarkha, Y. P. & Syvokon, V. E. A two-dimensional Wigner crystal. Low Temp. Phys. 38, 1067–1095 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bruun, G. M. & Nelson, D. R. Quantum hexatic order in two-dimensional dipolar and charged fluids. Phys. Rev. B 89, 094112 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Yu, H., Liu, G.-B., Gong, P., Xu, X. & Yao, W. Dirac cones and Dirac saddle points of bright excitons in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Commun. 5, 3876 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Qiu, D. Y., Cao, T. & Louie, S. G. Nonanalyticity, valley quantum phases, and lightlike exciton dispersion in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides: theory and first-principles calculations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 176801 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Scuri, G. et al. Large excitonic reflectivity of monolayer MoSe2 encapsulated in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 037402 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Efimkin, D. K. & MacDonald, A. H. Exciton-polarons in doped semiconductors in a strong magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 97, 235432 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Goryca, M. et al. Revealing exciton masses and dielectric properties of monolayer semiconductors with high magnetic fields. Nat. Commun. 10, 4172 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

C.K. and A.I. thank M. Knap for discussions. This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under grant no. 200021-178909/1. K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the Elemental Strategy Initiative conducted by MEXT, Japan, A3 Foresight by JSPS and CREST (grant no. JPMJCR15F3) and JST. P.E.D., I.E. and E.D. were supported by Harvard-MIT CUA, AFOSR-MURI: Photonic Quantum Matter award FA95501610323, Harvard Quantum Initiative.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.S. and A.I. conceived the experiments. T.S. carried out the measurements and analysed the data. M.K. and Y.S. helped with the experimental setup and the data analysis. K.W. and T.T. grew the hBN crystals. A.P., P.B. and X.L. fabricated the samples. P.E.D., C.K. and I.E. did the theoretical modelling and carried out the calculations under the guidance of E.D. T.S., P.E.D., E.D. and A.I. wrote the manuscript. T.S., E.D. and A.I. supervised the project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tomasz Smoleński, Eugene Demler or Ataç Imamoğlu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Device structure and the experimental setup.

a, Illustration of the structure of the device investigated in the main text. b, Simplified schematic of the experimental setup used for magneto-optical, mK-temperature measurements. FLG, few-layer graphene; NA, numerical aperture.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Normalization and differentiation of the reflectance data.

a, Reflectance spectra acquired for the main device at T = 80 mK at two different spots: one in the MoSe2 monolayer region (blue) and one off the MoSe2 monolayer (red). Both spectra were obtained at charge neutrality (Vt = −1 V) and in the absence of the magnetic field. b, The reflectance contrast spectrum Rc ≡ ΔR/R0 determined based on the two spectra from a. c, d, Colour plots showing zero-field top-gate voltage evolutions of the derivative of reflectance contrast \({R}_{{\rm{c}}}^{{\prime} }={\rm{d}}{R}_{{\rm{c}}}/{\rm{d}}{V}_{{\rm{t}}}\) with respect to the Vt (dashed lines mark the exciton and umklapp energies). The left panel presents a derivative evaluated numerically using standard, symmetric difference quotient method as \({R}_{{\rm{c}}}^{{\prime} }({V}_{{\rm{t}},n})=[{R}_{{\rm{c}}}({V}_{{\rm{t}},n+1})-{R}_{{\rm{c}}}({V}_{{\rm{t}},n-1})]/[{V}_{{\rm{t}},n+1}-{V}_{{\rm{t}},n-1}]\). The right panel shows a derivative of the same data obtained using the other method, in which dRc/dVt is computed as a difference quotient between symmetric data points separated not by two, but by four gate-voltage steps, that is, \({R}_{{\rm{c}}}^{{\prime} }({V}_{{\rm{t}},n})=[{R}_{{\rm{c}}}({V}_{{\rm{t}},n+2})-{R}_{{\rm{c}}}({V}_{{\rm{t}},n-2})]/[{V}_{{\rm{t}},n+2}-{V}_{{\rm{t}},n-2}]\). This method was used to plot the gate-voltage derivatives in Figs. 13.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Fitting the exciton and umklapp peaks with dispersive Lorentzian spectral profiles.

a, Colour map showing top-gate voltage evolution of the reflectance contrast Rc spectra measured at T = 80 mK for the main device, at zero magnetic field, for low electron doping densities, and in the spectral vicinity of the exciton peak. b, Similar map presenting evolution of the reflectance contrast Rc upon subtraction of the fitted exciton spectral profile RX as well as a smooth Gaussian-like background B (independent of the voltage). The dashed lines in both panels indicate the energies of the exciton and umklapp peaks. c, d, Cross-sections through the maps in a, b at Vt = 0.8 V showing, respectively, bare and background-corrected reflectance contrast spectra. The solid lines indicate the fits to the experimental data with dispersive Lorentzian spectral profiles, based on which we determined the exciton and umklapp energies (marked by vertical dashed lines). In the case of the umklapp peak, the fitting was carried out only in the energy region covered by the data points shown in green, in order to avoid spurious contribution around the energy of the main exciton (of about 1,635.5 meV at the selected Vt = 0.8 V) that originates from the residual of the exciton resonance fitting.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Calibration of the electron density for the dilution refrigerator experiments based on the Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations in the exciton linewidth.

a, Colour map presenting σ-polarized reflectance contrast spectra measured at T = 80 mK for the main device as a function of the top-gate voltage at B = 16 T. b, Gate-voltage dependence of the exciton linewidth extracted from the data in a by fitting the exciton resonance with a dispersive Lorentzian spectral profile. Dashed lines in both panels indicate the positions of integer filling factors. c, Gate voltages Vt(νB) corresponding to the positions of the exciton linewidth minima extracted from the reflectance measurements carried out at different magnetic fields. All of the presented data points were obtained in the regime where the Fermi level does not exceed the valley Zeeman splitting in the conduction band. Solid lines represent the fit of the data points with a set of linear dependencies corresponding to subsequent integer filling factors, which form a Landau level fan chart.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Comparison of the zero-field Wigner crystal signatures at T = 80 mK and T = 4 K.

a, b, Colour maps showing zero-field top-gate voltage evolution of the derivative of reflectance contrast spectra with respect to Vt measured in the dilution refrigerator for the main device at two different temperatures: T = 80 mK (a) and T = 4 K (b). Black dashed lines mark the fitted energy EX of the exciton resonance, and the green lines indicate the expected position of the umklapp peak EX + ΔEU for \(\Delta {E}_{{\rm{U}}}={h}^{2}{n}_{{\rm{e}}}/\sqrt{3}{m}_{{\rm{X}}}\) corresponding to a triangular Wigner crystal and mX = 1.1me.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Melting of the Wigner crystal at elevated temperatures.

a, Colour maps displaying back-gate voltage evolution of the derivative of reflectance contrast spectra with respect to Vb measured in the VTI-based setup at zero magnetic field and different temperatures of the main device (as indicated). In each map, the black dashed lines mark the fitted energy EX of the main exciton peak, while the green line in the map at T = 4.5 K represents the expected position of the umklapp resonance \({E}_{{\rm{X}}}+{h}^{2}{n}_{{\rm{e}}}/\sqrt{3}{m}_{{\rm{X}}}\) corresponding to a triangular Wigner crystal and mX = 1.3me. bd, Cross-sections through the maps in a (as well as through a similar map measured at T  = 15.2 K) at Vb = −0.6 V (b), Vb = −0.45 V (c), and Vb = −0.35 V (d) corresponding to electron densities ne/1011 cm−2 of, respectively, 1.2, 1.6 and 1.9. e, Relative amplitude of the umklapp transition determined as a function of the temperature as the average value of d(ΔR/R0)/dVb in a 0.8-meV-wide energy window around the umklapp energy (marked by shaded regions in bd) at different electron densities (as indicated). The error bar for each data point is estimated as a standard error (that is, standard deviation of the mean) of all points within the aforementioned energy window for a given ne and T. The solid lines represent the fits of the temperature dependence for each ne with a linear decrease a(TmT) + b at T < Tm and a flat background level b at T > Tm, with a melting temperatures Tm = 11 ± 1 K of the Wigner crystal being found to be the same for all investigated values of ne within the experimental uncertainty. f, The same cross-sections as in c (determined at Vb = −0.45 V) together with the solid lines representing the fits of the umklapp lineshapes at different temperatures with a phenomenological Lorentzian profile overlaid on a (fixed) polynomial background. g, Temperature-dependent relative amplitude of the umklapp peak at ne ≈ 1.6 × 1011 cm−2 extracted based on the Lorentzian fits from f (as well as based on similar fits of the data taken at different temperatures; the error bars correspond to standard errors increased by a temperature-independent term that is introduced to account for systematic uncertainty stemming from determination of the background profile). Solid line indicates a linear fit to the data points with non-zero amplitude corresponding to the same Wigner crystal melting temperature of Tm = 11 ± 1 K.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Analysis of disorder-induced broadening of the umklapp peak.

a, b, Colour maps showing top-gate voltage evolution of the differentiated reflectance contrast d(ΔR/R0)/dE (a) and the bare reflectance contrast ΔR/R0 (b) acquired for the main device at B = 14 T, T = 80 mK, and in σ polarization of detection (note that these results were obtained in a different measurement than that shown in Fig. 3e, f). Grey horizontal dashed lines mark the voltages corresponding to filling factors of ν = 0, 0.34, and 1. White (black) dashed (dotted) line indicates the fitted energy EX(σ) (EX(σ+)) of the σ-polarized (σ+-polarized) main exciton resonance. The green dashed line represents the expected energy of the umklapp peak determined as \({E}_{{\rm{X}}}({\sigma }^{+})+\Delta {E}_{{\rm{U}}}^{+}\), where \(\Delta {E}_{{\rm{U}}}^{+}={h}^{2}{n}_{{\rm{e}}}/\sqrt{3}{m}_{{\rm{X}}}+s{k}_{{\rm{W}}}-\sqrt{{(s{k}_{{\rm{W}}})}^{2}+{({\varDelta }_{{\rm{Z}}}/2)}^{2}}+{\varDelta }_{{\rm{Z}}}/2\) represents the umklapp–main exciton detuning calculated within the frame the model from Supplementary Information section 3 using the exciton mass of mX = 1.3me, the strength of the electron–hole exchange s|K| = 300 meV (with |K| representing the valley momentum), and experimentally determined main exciton Zeeman splitting ΔZ = 3.6 meV. c, d, Cross-sections through the maps in a, b at Vt = 0.45 V corresponding to the electron density ne ≈ 1.16 × 1011 cm−2 and Landau level filling factor ν ≈ 0.34. The solid line in c shows the fit of the experimental data with a sum of two differentiated dispersive Lorentzian spectral profiles \({R}_{{\rm{X}}}^{{\prime} }(E)+{R}_{{\rm{U}}}^{{\prime} }(E)\) representing the main and umklapp resonances. The solid line in d in turn depicts the fit of the main exciton resonance in the bare reflectance spectrum with a transfer-matrix model, allowing us to extract the nonradiative broadening of the exciton \({\gamma }_{{\rm{X}}}^{{\rm{nrad}}}=0.78\,{\rm{meV}}\). e, The fits of the differentiated reflectance spectrum at ν ≈ 0.34 with the sum of two differentiated dispersive Lorentzians \({R}_{{\rm{X}}}^{{\prime} }(E)+{R}_{{\rm{U}}}^{{\prime} }(E)\) corresponding to different correlation lengths of the Wigner crystal (as indicated). For each fit the parameters of the main exciton resonance (that is, amplitude AX, linewidth γX, energy EX and phase φX) as well as the phase φ0 and the energy EU of the umklapp peak are fixed at the values obtained from the fit in c. The linewidth and amplitude of the umklapp resonance are assumed to be given by \({\gamma }_{{\rm{U}}}={\gamma }_{{\rm{X}}}^{{\rm{nrad}}}+{\gamma }_{{\rm{U}}}^{{\rm{dis}}}\) and AU = αUAX, where the disorder-induced broadening \({\gamma }_{{\rm{U}}}^{{\rm{dis}}}\) and the relative amplitude αU are fitted based on the predictions of the theoretical model from Supplementary Information section 6 describing the umklapp lineshape for a Wigner crystal with a given correlation length. For all fits αU is assumed to be smaller than 5%. f, The coefficient of determination R2 evaluated for the fits corresponding to different Wigner crystal correlation lengths based on the data points in a 2-meV-wide energy window around the umklapp resonance (marked by shaded region). The dashed line indicates the value of R2 obtained in the same way for an unconstrained fit in c.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Observation of zero-magnetic-field Wigner crystal signatures for the second device.

a, Colour map showing reflectance contrast spectra measured as a function of the top-gate voltage Vt for the second device. The data were acquired at T = 4 K and in the absence of the magnetic field. b, Gate-voltage evolution of the derivative of the spectra from a with respect to Vt. Black dashed lines in both panels indicate the energy of the exciton peak EX obtained by fitting its spectral profile with dispersive Lorentzian lineshape. Green lines mark the expected position EX + ΔEU of the umklapp peak, where \(\Delta {E}_{{\rm{U}}}={h}^{2}{n}_{{\rm{e}}}/\sqrt{3}{m}_{{\rm{X}}}\) is computed under an assumption of a triangular Wigner crystal and for the value of exciton mass mX = 1.3me.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Information Sections 1-6, including Supplementary Figures 1-12 and additional references.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smoleński, T., Dolgirev, P.E., Kuhlenkamp, C. et al. Signatures of Wigner crystal of electrons in a monolayer semiconductor. Nature 595, 53–57 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03590-4

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links