Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reply to: Old-growth forest carbon sinks overestimated

The Original Article was published on 24 March 2021

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Gundersen, P. Old-growth forest carbon sinks overestimated. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03266-z (2021).

  2. 2.

    Luyssaert, S. et al. Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature 455, 213–215 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yang, Y., Luo, Y. & Finzi, A. C. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics during forest stand development: a global synthesis. New Phytol. 190, 977–989 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fontaine, S. et al. Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450, 277–280 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Houlton, B. Z. & Dahlgren, R. A. Convergent evidence for widespread rock nitrogen sources in Earth’s surface environment. Science 62, 58–62 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science 368, eaaz7005 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hyvönen, R. et al. The likely impact of elevated [CO2], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. New Phytol. 173, 463–480 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Clark, D. A. et al. Net primary production in tropical forests: an evaluation and synthesis of existing field data. Ecol. Appl. 11, 371–384 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wharton, S. & Falk, M. Climate indices strongly influence old-growth forest carbon exchange. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 044016 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Campioli, M. et al. Evaluating the convergence between eddy-covariance and biometric methods for assessing carbon budgets of forests. Nat. Commun. 7, 13717 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Luyssaert, S. et al. Toward a consistency cross-check of eddy covariance flux-based and biometric estimates of ecosystem carbon balance. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003377 (2009).

  13. 13.

    Nord-Larsen, T., Vesterdal, L., Bentsen, N. S. & Larsen, J. B. Ecosystem carbon stocks and their temporal resilience in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 447, 67–76 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kwon, H., Law, B. E., Thomas, C. K. & Johnson, B. G. The influence of hydrological variability on inherent water use efficiency in forests of contrasting composition, age, and precipitation regimes in the Pacific Northwest U.S. Agric. For. Meteorol. 249, 488–500 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Law, B. E. & Berner, L. T. NACP TERRA-PNW: Forest Plant Traits, NPP, Biomass, and Soil Properties 1999–2014 https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1292 (ORNL DAAC, 2015).

  16. 16.

    Falk, M., Wharton, S., Schroeder, M., Ustin, S. L. & Paw, U. K. T. Flux partitioning in an old-growth forest: seasonal and interannual dynamics. Tree Physiol. 28, 509–520 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    FLUXNET2015 Dataset: Data Processing https://fluxnet.fluxdata.org/data/fluxnet2015-dataset/data-processing/ (Fluxnet, accessed 25 April 2020).

  18. 18.

    Potapov, P. et al. The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Sci. Adv. 3, e1600821 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Magnani, F. et al. The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature 447, 849–851 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jiang, M. et al. The fate of carbon in a mature forest under carbon dioxide enrichment. Nature 580, 227–231 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhou, G. et al. Old-growth forests can accumulate carbon in soils. Science 314, 1417–1417 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nabuurs, G.-J. et al. First signs of carbon sink saturation in European forest biomass. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 792–796 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the writing of the Matters Arising Reply. We could not reach Annett Börner and Dominik Hessenmöller, who co-authored the original study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastiaan Luyssaert.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luyssaert, S., Schulze, ED., Knohl, A. et al. Reply to: Old-growth forest carbon sinks overestimated. Nature 591, E24–E25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03267-y

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links