Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Reply to: Methods matter in repeating ocean acidification studies

The Original Article was published on 21 October 2020

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Reports of attraction of coral reef fishes to predator chemical cues under elevated CO2 by Munday and colleagues have been consistent across species and time.

References

  1. 1.

    Dixson, D. L., Munday, P. L. & Jones, G. P. Ocean acidification disrupts the innate ability of fish to detect predator olfactory cues. Ecol. Lett. 13, 68–75 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Munday, P. L. et al. Replenishment of fish populations is threatened by ocean acidification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12930–12934 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Clements, J. C. & Hunt, H. L. Marine animal behaviour in a high CO2 ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 536, 259–279 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Watson, S.-A. et al. Marine mollusc predator-escape behaviour altered by near-future carbon dioxide levels. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132377 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Clark, T. D. et al. Ocean acidification does not impair the behaviour of coral reef fishes. Nature 577, 370–375 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Munday, P. L. et al. Methods matter in repeating ocean acidification studies. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2803-x (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nosek, B. A. & Errington, T. M. What is replication? PLoS Biol. 18, e3000691 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Munday, P. L. et al. Elevated CO2 affects the behavior of an ecologically and economically important coral reef fish. Mar. Biol. 160, 2137–2144 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Munday, P. L., Cheal, A. J., Dixson, D. L., Rummer, J. L. & Fabricius, K. E. Behavioural impairment in reef fishes caused by ocean acidification at CO2 seeps. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 487–492 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Munday, P. L. et al. Effects of elevated CO2 on predator avoidance behaviour by reef fishes is not altered by experimental test water. PeerJ 4, e2501 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ioannidis, J. P. A. Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 645–654 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Browman, H. I. Applying organized scepticism to ocean acidification research. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 73, 529–536 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Nissen, S. B., Magidson, T., Gross, K. & Bergstrom, C. T. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts. eLife 5, e21451 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to writing and editing the paper and Supplementary Information.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy D. Clark.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary information, Supplementary Figures and additional references.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clark, T.D., Raby, G.D., Roche, D.G. et al. Reply to: Methods matter in repeating ocean acidification studies. Nature 586, E25–E27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2804-9

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links