Single-cell analysis is a valuable tool for dissecting cellular heterogeneity in complex systems1. However, a comprehensive single-cell atlas has not been achieved for humans. Here we use single-cell mRNA sequencing to determine the cell-type composition of all major human organs and construct a scheme for the human cell landscape (HCL). We have uncovered a single-cell hierarchy for many tissues that have not been well characterized. We established a ‘single-cell HCL analysis’ pipeline that helps to define human cell identity. Finally, we performed a single-cell comparative analysis of landscapes from human and mouse to identify conserved genetic networks. We found that stem and progenitor cells exhibit strong transcriptomic stochasticity, whereas differentiated cells are more distinct. Our results provide a useful resource for the study of human biology.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscription info for Chinese customers
We have a dedicated website for our Chinese customers. Please go to naturechina.com to subscribe to this journal.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The CNGB Nucleotide Sequence Archive accession number is CNP0000325 (https://db.cngb.org/search/?q=CNP0000325). The GEO accession number is GSE134355. The human DGE data are available at https://figshare.com/articles/HCL_DGE_Data/7235471. The mouse DGE data are available at https://figshare.com/articles/MCA_DGE_Data/5435866. Source Data for Figs. 2, 4 and Extended Data Figs. 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 are provided with the paper. HCL data can also be accessed at http://bis.zju.edu.cn/HCL/ or https://db.cngb.org/HCL/.
Tanay, A. & Regev, A. Scaling single-cell genomics from phenomenology to mechanism. Nature 541, 331–338 (2017).
Tang, F. et al. mRNA-seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).
Ramsköld, D. et al. Full-length mRNA-seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 777–782 (2012).
Treutlein, B. et al. Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lung epithelium using single-cell RNA-seq. Nature 509, 371–375 (2014).
Shalek, A. K. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells. Nature 498, 236–240 (2013).
Macosko, E. Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015).
Klein, A. M. et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015).
Plass, M. et al. Cell type atlas and lineage tree of a whole complex animal by single-cell transcriptomics. Science 360, eaaq1723 (2018).
Wagner, D. E. et al. Single-cell mapping of gene expression landscapes and lineage in the zebrafish embryo. Science 360, 981–987 (2018).
Sebe-Pedros, A. et al. Cnidarian cell type diversity and regulation revealed by whole-organism single-cell RNA-seq. Cell 173, 1520–1534.e1520 (2018).
Plasschaert, L. W. et al. A single-cell atlas of the airway epithelium reveals the CFTR-rich pulmonary ionocyte. Nature 560, 377–381 (2018).
Fincher, C. T., Wurtzel, O., de Hoog, T., Kravarik, K. M. & Reddien, P. W. Cell type transcriptome atlas for the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Science 360, eaaq1736 (2018).
Farrell, J. A. et al. Single-cell reconstruction of developmental trajectories during zebrafish embryogenesis. Science 360, eaar3131 (2018).
Cao, J. et al. Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science 357, 661–667 (2017).
Spanjaard, B. et al. Simultaneous lineage tracing and cell-type identification using CRISPR-Cas9-induced genetic scars. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 469–473 (2018).
Han, X. et al. Mapping the mouse cell atlas by microwell-seq. Cell 172, 1091–1107.e1017 (2018).
Tabula Muris Consortium. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature 562, 367–372 (2018).
Cao, J. et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature 566, 496–502 (2019).
Pijuan-Sala, B. et al. A single-cell molecular map of mouse gastrulation and early organogenesis. Nature 566, 490–495 (2019).
Zhong, S. et al. A single-cell RNA-seq survey of the developmental landscape of the human prefrontal cortex. Nature 555, 524–528 (2018).
Young, M. D. et al. Single-cell transcriptomes from human kidneys reveal the cellular identity of renal tumors. Science 361, 594–599 (2018).
Lake, B. B. et al. Integrative single-cell analysis of transcriptional and epigenetic states in the human adult brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 70–80 (2018).
Gao, S. et al. Tracing the temporal-spatial transcriptome landscapes of the human fetal digestive tract using single-cell RNA-sequencing. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 721–734 (2018).
Velten, L. et al. Human haematopoietic stem cell lineage commitment is a continuous process. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 271–281 (2017).
Li, L. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis maps development of human germline cells and gonadal niche interactions. Cell Stem Cell 20, 858–873.e854 (2017).
Guo, J. et al. Chromatin and single-cell rna-seq profiling reveal dynamic signaling and metabolic transitions during human spermatogonial stem cell development. Cell Stem Cell 21, 533–546.e536 (2017).
Segerstolpe, Å. et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of human pancreatic islets in health and type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 24, 593–607 (2016).
Muraro, M. J. et al. A single-cell transcriptome atlas of the human pancreas. Cell Syst. 3, 385–394.e383 (2016).
Baron, M. et al. A single-cell transcriptomic map of the human and mouse pancreas reveals inter- and intra-cell population structure. Cell Syst. 3, 346–360.e344 (2016).
Blakeley, P. et al. Defining the three cell lineages of the human blastocyst by single-cell RNA-seq. Development 142, 3151–3165 (2015).
Yan, L. et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1131–1139 (2013).
Aizarani, N. et al. A human liver cell atlas reveals heterogeneity and epithelial progenitors. Nature 572, 199–204 (2019).
Vodyanik, M. A., Bork, J. A., Thomson, J. A. & Slukvin, I. I. Human embryonic stem cell-derived CD34+ cells: efficient production in the coculture with OP9 stromal cells and analysis of lymphohematopoietic potential. Blood 105, 617–626 (2005).
Rezania, A. et al. Reversal of diabetes with insulin-producing cells derived in vitro from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1121–1133 (2014).
Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F. & Regev, A. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 495–502 (2015).
Tosches, M. A. et al. Evolution of pallium, hippocampus, and cortical cell types revealed by single-cell transcriptomics in reptiles. Science 360, 881–888 (2018).
Vento-Tormo, R. et al. Single-cell reconstruction of the early maternal-fetal interface in humans. Nature 563, 347–353 (2018).
Wolf, F. A. et al. PAGA: graph abstraction reconciles clustering with trajectory inference through a topology preserving map of single cells. Genome Biol. 20, 59 (2019).
Chu, L. F. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals novel regulators of human embryonic stem cell differentiation to definitive endoderm. Genome Biol. 17, 173 (2016).
Roerink, S. F. et al. Intra-tumour diversification in colorectal cancer at the single-cell level. Nature 556, 457–462 (2018).
Camp, J. G. et al. Multilineage communication regulates human liver bud development from pluripotency. Nature 546, 533–538 (2017).
Camp, J. G. et al. Human cerebral organoids recapitulate gene expression programs of fetal neocortex development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15672–15677 (2015).
La Manno, G. et al. Molecular diversity of midbrain development in mouse, human, and stem cells. Cell 167, 566–580.e519 (2016).
Hodge, R. D. et al. Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex. Nature 573, 61–68 (2019).
Aibar, S. et al. SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering. Nat. Methods 14, 1083–1086 (2017).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
Buettner, F. et al. Computational analysis of cell-to-cell heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-sequencing data reveals hidden subpopulations of cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 155–160 (2015).
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).
Galili, T. dendextend: an R package for visualizing, adjusting and comparing trees of hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 31, 3718–3720 (2015).
Suo, S. et al. Revealing the critical regulators of cell identity in the mouse cell atlas. Cell Rep. 25, 1436–1445.e3 (2018).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
La Manno, G. et al. RNA velocity of single cells. Nature 560, 494–498 (2018).
Crow, M., Paul, A., Ballouz, S., Huang, Z. J. & Gillis, J. Characterizing the replicability of cell types defined by single cell RNA-sequencing data using MetaNeighbor. Nat. Commun. 9, 884 (2018).
Guo, M., Bao, E. L., Wagner, M., Whitsett, J. A. & Xu, Y. SLICE: determining cell differentiation and lineage based on single cell entropy. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, e54 (2017).
Grün, D. et al. De novo prediction of stem cell identity using single-cell transcriptome data. Cell Stem Cell 19, 266–277 (2016).
Guo, J. et al. The adult human testis transcriptional cell atlas. Cell Res. 28, 1141–1157 (2018).
Han, X. et al. Mapping human pluripotent stem cell differentiation pathways using high throughput single-cell RNA-sequencing. Genome Biol. 19, 47 (2018).
Karamitros, D. et al. Single-cell analysis reveals the continuum of human lympho-myeloid progenitor cells. Nat. Immunol. 19, 85–97 (2018).
Nguyen, Q. H. et al. Profiling human breast epithelial cells using single cell RNA sequencing identifies cell diversity. Nat. Commun. 9, 2028 (2018).
Tsang, J. C. H. et al. Integrative single-cell and cell-free plasma RNA transcriptomics elucidates placental cellular dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7786–E7795 (2017).
Villani, A. C. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals new types of human blood dendritic cells, monocytes, and progenitors. Science 356, eaah4573 (2017).
Wang, M. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis reveals sequential cell fate transition during human spermatogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 23, 599–614.e4 (2018).
Celniker, S. E. et al. Unlocking the secrets of the genome. Nature 459, 927–930 (2009).
Gu, Z., Gu, L., Eils, R., Schlesner, M. & Brors, B. circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics 30, 2811–2812 (2014).
Fuxman Bass, J. I. et al. Using networks to measure similarity between genes: association index selection. Nat. Methods 10, 1169–1176 (2013).
We thank G-BIO (Hangzhou), Sidansai Biotechnology (Shanghai), BGI (Shenzhen) and CNGB (Shenzhen) for supporting this project; Vazyme for supplying the customized enzymes in the study; the Core Facilities of Zhejiang University School of Medicine for technical support; the Center of Cryo-Electron Microscopy at Zhejiang University for computational support; and Y. Zhu, J. Zhu, L. Huang, L. Shao, Z. Wang, H. Huang, X. Wu, W. Lin, M. Bai, Q. Sun, X. Wu, M. Yao, F. Zhu, Z. Li, L. Huang, L. Shao, Z. Wang and X. Chen for help with sample collection. This publication is part of the Human Cell Atlas: www.humancellatlas.org/publications/. G.G. is a participant of the Human Cell Atlas Project (International), the Alliance for Atlas of Blood Cells (China), and the Cell Atlas Project (Zhejiang University Stem Cell Institute). This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 91842301, 81770188, 31722027, 31922049, 31701290, and 31871473), the National Key Research and Development Program (grants 2018YFA0107804, 2018YFA0107801, 2018YFA0800503, and 2018YFC1005003), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant R17H080001), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (G.G.).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature thanks Berthold Gottgens, Rosario Isasi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
a, Comparison of t-SNE maps for lung data sets from Tabula Muris (10X Genomics), down-sampled Tabula Muris data (10X Genomics), and MCA data (microwell-seq). Note that downsampling in sequencing depth does not affect cell-type clusters in the Tabula Muris data. Notably, lung data from MCA (sequenced at lower depth) detects more cell-type clusters, including important lung epithelial cells such as AT1 cells, club cells and biopotent progenitors. b, Numbers of cells processed by 31 December 2019 at the HCL for each tissue type. c, Venn diagrams of gene numbers detected in bulk RNA sequencing and microwell-seq (genes with fewer than three counts are excluded). Scatter plots on the right show high correlations (more than 0.8) of average gene expression between bulk RNA sequencing and microwell-seq. We analysed 17,058 genes for kidney and 16,910 genes for lung. d, The percentage of cell types recovered in sub-samples of adult lung, kidney and adrenal gland single-cell data. The major cell-type numbers in representative tissues are near plateau at around 8,000 cells; we collected more than 10,000 cells per tissue on average. e, A Seurat analysis of donor batch effect from four fetal kidney samples (n = 22,439 cells) and three adult kidney samples (n = 22,692 cells). The mixing of different donor single cells in each cell-type cluster suggests a relatively low batch effect in the data. The cluster contribution bar charts on the right suggest that one of the fetal kidney donors lacks C19 and one of the adult kidney donors lacks C22.
a, Verification of pseudo-cell analysis for network interpretation from HCL data. Left, numbers of genes in single cell, pseudo-cell 5, pseudo-cell 10, pseudo-cell 20, pseudo-cell 50 and pseudo-cell 100 from mouse lung single-cell data14,15 generated by 10X Genomics, Smart-seq2 and microwell-seq. Genes were calculated in each cell or pseudo-cell. Sample sizes for each box from left to right were: 10X Genomics: 5,449, 1,089, 540, 272, 112 and 62; Smart-seq2: 1,620, 324, 158, 83, 33 and 20; microwell-seq: 6,940, 1,390, 686, 349, 142 and 81. Right, silhouette value in single cell, pseudo-cell 5, pseudo-cell 10, pseudo-cell 20, pseudo-cell 50 and pseudo-cell 100 from mouse lung single-cell data. A high silhouette value represents good separation. Sample sizes for each box from left to right were: 6,940, 1,390, 686, 349, 142 and 81. Box plots: centre line, median; boxes, first and third quartiles of the distribution; whiskers, highest and lowest data points within 1.5 × IQR. b, t-SNE map of HCL pseudo-cell data showing improved cell-type clustering (n = 30,053 pseudo-cells). c, TF–TF correlation heat map covering 1,521 human TFs generated using HCL pseudo-cell data. The correlation data are listed in Supplementary Table 2. d, Representative TF network in the HCL (PCC > 0.5). Note that the HCL TF network is highly related within small modules but discrete among different modules.
t-SNE maps for single-cell data from fetal skin 2 (a; n = 5,294 cells), fetal brain 5 (b, n = 5,096), fetal pancreas 2 (c, n = 6,939), fetal female gonad 1 (d, n = 2,710), fetal rib 3 (e, n = 4,560), fetal male gonad 1 (f, n = 3,358), chorionic villus 1 (g, n = 9,898), and fetal calvaria 1 (h, n = 5,129). Cells are coloured by cell-type cluster.
t-SNE maps for single-cell data from adult gallbladder 1 (a, n = 9,769 cells), adult liver 4 (b, n = 4,384), adult transverse colon 1 (c, n = 5,765), adult duodenum 1 (d, n = 4,681), adult ileum 2 (e, n = 3,367), adult trachea 2 (f, n = 9,949), adult thyroid gland 1 (g, n = 6,319), and adult peripheral blood 1 (h, n = 2,719). Cells are coloured according to cell-type cluster.
a, t-SNE map of fetal kidney 4 single-cell data (n = 4,511 cells). The experiment was replicated four times with similar results. b, t-SNE map of adult kidney 2 single-cell data (n = 8,877 cells). The experiment was replicated three times with similar results. c, t-SNE map of fetal lung 1 single-cell data (n = 4,526 cells). The experiment was replicated twice with similar results. d, t-SNE map of adult lung 1 single-cell data (n = 8,426 cells). The experiment was replicated three times with similar results. All cells in a–d are coloured according to cell-type cluster. e–h, Ligand and receptor analysis of fetal kidney 4 (e), adult kidney 2 (f), fetal lung 1 (g) and adult lung 1 (h) using the method CellPhoneDB. The colours represent cell types; line thickness indicates the degree of association between cell types.
a, t-SNE map of adult pleura 1 single-cell data (n = 19,695 cells). Cells are coloured according to cell-type cluster in a, c and d. b, Gene expression heat map showing the top 20 differentially expressed genes for each cell cluster in adult pleura 1. Dark blue, high expression; light blue, low expression. Representative genes are labelled in the corresponding area on the right. c, t-SNE map of adult omentum 3 single-cell data (n = 1,354 cells). d, t-SNE map of fetal muscle single-cell data (n = 18,345 cells). e, Feature plot in the t-SNE map of adult lung 1 single-cell data (n = 8,426 cells). Cells are coloured according to the expression of the indicated marker genes. f, Immunofluorescence assay for the epithelial cell marker KRT17 and the CXC chemokine CXCL2 in human adult lung tissue. Scale bar, 50 μm. The experiment was replicated three times with similar results.
a, b, t-SNE maps of single-cell data for human tissue-specific stromal cells (n = 9,452 cells). Cells are coloured according to stromal cell subtype (a) or tissue type (b). c, Bar plots showing the contributions of donors to each of the stromal and endothelial cell clusters.
a, Heat map showing the similarity (PCC) between cell types of adult kidney and fetal kidney. Blue, low similarity; red, high similarity. b, Heat map showing the similarity (PCC) between cell types of adult lung and fetal lung. Blue, low similarity; red, high similarity. c, d, Branching gene expression trajectory analysis of non-immune cells in fetal and adult human tissues using PAGA. c, Coloured by developmental stages; d, coloured by cell lineages. Differential gene expression analysis was performed for representative lineage progression; top markers for fetal (light blue) and adult (dark blue) cells are shown. Marker lists are provided in the source data. e, Single-cell entropy of non-immune cells in each fetal and adult tissue pair (right) and for combined adult and fetal data (left) measured by SLICE54. Box plots: centre line, median; boxes, first and third quartiles of the distribution; whiskers, highest and lowest data points within 1.5 × IQR. Sample from left to right: 2,770, 3,557, 522, 279, 340, 193, 270, 38, 885, 631, 208, 353, 187, 111, 268, 112, 294, 314, 583, 739.
a, scHCL results for bulk human ES cell data (n = 17 samples). Each row represents one cell type in our reference. Each column represents a bulk sample. PCC was used to evaluate cell-type gene expression similarity. Red, high correlation; grey, low correlation. Some cell-type data come from published works, as denoted by first author name: Zhong20, Li25, Segerstolpe27, Baron29, VentoTormo37, Camp42, LaManno43, Han57. b, scHCL results for colorectal cancer organoid data (n = 15 samples), as in a. c, scHCL results for liver bud organoid data (n = 465 cells), as in a except that each column represents a single cell in the customer data set. d, scHCL results for cerebral organoid data (n = 508 cells), as in c. e, t-SNE map of single-cell data for day 20 embryoid bodies differentiated from human iPS cells (n = 9,140 cells). Cells are coloured according to cell-type cluster. f, scHCL results obtained using the data set of day 20 embryoid bodies differentiated from human iPS cells (n = 9,140 cells), as in c. g, Cell–cell correlation network for embryoid body. Each node represents a pseudo-cell in each cell type.
a, t-SNE analysis of 333,778 single cells from the MCA data, with 104 main cell-type clusters labelled. b, t-SNE analysis of 333,778 single cells from the MCA data, with tissue types labelled. c, t-SNE map of pseudo-cell 20 data for mouse (n = 16,740 pseudo-cells). Pseudo-cells are coloured according to cell-type cluster. d, Heat map showing the conserved cell types in human and mouse adult kidney. AUROC scores were calculated from the Spearman correlation between human and mouse adult kidney pseudo-cells (n = 1,197 pseudo-cells). e, Heat map showing conserved cell types in human and mouse fetal kidney. AUROC scores were calculated from the Spearman correlation between human and mouse fetal kidney pseudo-cells (n = 1,459 pseudo-cells).
a, b, Binary regulon activity t-SNE maps for human and mouse based on 259 human regulons (a) and 248 mouse regulons (b), created with R package SCENIC. Each dot represents a pseudo-cell of 20 in the HCL or MCA cell clusters. The t-SNE maps were created using binary regulon activity matrices from 17,028 human pseudo-cells and 16,740 mouse pseudo-cells. c, Binary RASs for human special regulon BHLHE41 and mouse special regulon Olig1 in the regulon activity t-SNE maps (n = 17,028 for human; n = 16,740 for mouse). d, Binary RASs for human special regulon FOXO1 and mouse special regulon Dlx5 in the regulon activity t-SNE maps (n = 17,028 for human; n = 16,740 for mouse). e, Binary RASs for human special regulon ZNF230 and mouse special regulon Mlxipl in the regulon activity t-SNE maps (n = 17,028 for human; n = 16,740 for mouse). f, Binary RASs for regulons IRF8/Irf8 and GATA1/Gata1 in the regulon activity t-SNE maps (n = 17,028 for human; n = 16,740 for mouse). Note that in the regulation of antigen-presenting endothelial cells, the IRF8/Irf8 regulon is conserved. In the regulation of erythroid cells, the GATA1/Gata1 regulon is conserved.
The table contains the age (gestational age for fetal tissues), gender, cause of death, medical history of the donors, sample location, source, dissociation, concentration and digestion time of the tissues. Information about sequencing titration experiment, the analysed cell number, experimental batches, and average transcript number (UMI) are also provided. All used 0ligonucleotide sequences are listed in the last sheet of the table.
Supplementary Table 2 | Differentially expressed genes detected in 102 human cell types from HCL and 104 mouse cell types from MCA
P values were calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (n = gene name, l = logFc, s = score, p = P value). Statistical tests were two-sided. Tissue contribution for each of the HCL clusters and HCL TF-TF correlation data matrix are also provided.
Supplementary Table 3 | Differentially expressed genes detected in each cell type for all tissues or cell lines in HCL datasets
Genes were selected by log foldchange > 0.25, Bonferroni-adjusted P < 0.1, expressed in at least 15% of cells in either population (Seurat FindAllMarkers). Log foldchange (avg_logFC) was calculated as the arithmetic mean of ln cpm values of one population minus the arithmetic mean of ln cpm values of the other populations. P value (p_val) was calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Statistical tests were two-sided. Sample size for each tissue type was listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Supplementary Table 4 | Sheet 1: List of novel cell populations revealed from the HCL study. Sheets 2 and 3: Differentially expressed genes detected in the cross-tissue comparison of stromal (n=9,452) and endothelial (n=7,140) cells
Genes are selected by log foldchange > 0.25, Bonferroni-adjusted P < 0.1, expressed in at least 15% of cells in either population (Seurat FindAllMarkers). Log foldchange (avg_logFC) was calculated as the arithmetic mean of ln cpm values of one population minus the arithmetic mean of ln cpm values of the other populations. P value (p_val) was calculated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Statistical tests were two-sided. Sheet 4 and 5: Differentially expressed genes between fetal and adult stage for 85 pairs of fetal-to-adult cell types. Genes are ranked by the number of times they appear as fetal or adult differentially expressed genes. Statistical tests were two-sided. Commonly enriched genes for fetal cells are listed on sheet 4; commonly enriched genes for adult cells are listed on sheet 5.
The sources of published datasets used in scHCL are listed. The relationship of the corresponding conserved cell types among human and mouse are measured using AUROC scores in MetaNeighbor. The TFs are grouped into 140 orthologous regulons and then clustered into 15 orthologous TF-TF regulon modules using clustering method ‘complete’. The TF module activity in each cluster is listed; a comparison between human and mouse regulons is also provided.
About this article
Cite this article
Han, X., Zhou, Z., Fei, L. et al. Construction of a human cell landscape at single-cell level. Nature 581, 303–309 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2157-4
In silico analysis suggests disruption of interactions between HAMP from hepatocytes and SLC40A1 from macrophages in hepatocellular carcinoma
BMC Medical Genomics (2021)
Genome Biology (2021)
SCAPTURE: a deep learning-embedded pipeline that captures polyadenylation information from 3′ tag-based RNA-seq of single cells
Genome Biology (2021)
BMC Bioinformatics (2021)
Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of endometriosis provides insights into fibroblast fates and immune cell heterogeneity
Cell & Bioscience (2021)