The known diversity of tetrapods of the Devonian period has increased markedly in recent decades, but their fossil record consists mostly of tantalizing fragments1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. The framework for interpreting the morphology and palaeobiology of Devonian tetrapods is dominated by the near complete fossils of Ichthyostega and Acanthostega; the less complete, but partly reconstructable, Ventastega and Tulerpeton have supporting roles2,4,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34. All four of these genera date to the late Famennian age (about 365–359 million years ago)—they are 10 million years younger than the earliest known tetrapod fragments5,10, and nearly 30 million years younger than the oldest known tetrapod footprints35. Here we describe Parmastega aelidae gen. et sp. nov., a tetrapod from Russia dated to the earliest Famennian age (about 372 million years ago), represented by three-dimensional material that enables the reconstruction of the skull and shoulder girdle. The raised orbits, lateral line canals and weakly ossified postcranial skeleton of P. aelidae suggest a largely aquatic, surface-cruising animal. In Bayesian and parsimony-based phylogenetic analyses, the majority of trees place Parmastega as a sister group to all other tetrapods.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscription info for Chinese customers
We have a dedicated website for our Chinese customers. Please go to naturechina.com to subscribe to this journal.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
In total, 132 specimens comprising 183 skeletal elements were collected during the entire period of excavations (2002–2012). One hundred and six specimens (all of them figured in Supplementary Table 1) have been deposited in the collection of the Institute of Geology, Komi Science Centre (Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Russia) under collection number IG KSC 705/. One specimen has been deposited in the Ukhta Local Museum under collection number ULM 2599. The IG KSC and ULM specimens are available for examination. Other specimens have been reserved for sharing with other museums. The Life Science Identifier for Parmastega is urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:76B5BB03-42FE-4F46-A284-F95E973CEE96.
Campbell, K. S. W. & Bell, M. W. A primitive amphibian from the Late Devonian of New South Wales. Alcheringa 1, 369–381 (1977).
Lebedev, O. A. The first find of a Devonian tetrapod in USSR [in Russian]. Doklady Acad. Nauk SSSR 278, 1470–1473 (1984).
Daeschler, E. B., Shubin, N. H., Thomson, K. S. & Amaral, W. W. A Devonian tetrapod from North America. Science 265, 639–642 (1994).
Ahlberg, P. E., Lukševičs, E. & Lebedev, O. The first tetrapod finds from the Devonian (Upper Famennian) of Latvia. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 343, 303–328 (1994).
Ahlberg, P. E. Elginerpeton pancheni and the earliest tetrapod clade. Nature 373, 420–425 (1995).
Daeschler, E. B. Early tetrapod jaws from the Late Devonian of Pennsylvania, USA. J. Paleontol. 74, 301–308 (2000).
Zhu, M., Ahlberg, P. E., Zhao, W. & Jia, L. First Devonian tetrapod from Asia. Nature 420, 760–761 (2002).
Lebedev, O. A. A new tetrapod Jakubsonia livnensis from the Early Famennian (Devonian) of Russia and palaeoecological remarks on the Late Devonian tetrapod habitats. Acta Univ. Latviensis 679, 79–98 (2004).
Clack, J. A., Ahlberg, P. E., Blom, H. & Finney, S. M. A new genus of Devonian tetrapod from North-East Greenland, with new information on the lower jaw of Ichthyostega. Palaeontology 55, 73–86 (2012).
Clément, G. & Lebedev, O. A. Revision of the early tetrapod Obruchevichthys Vorobyeva, 1977 from the Frasnian (Upper Devonian) of the north-western East European Platform. Paleontol. J. 48, 1082–1091 (2014).
Gess, R. & Ahlberg, P. E. A tetrapod fauna from within the Devonian Antarctic Circle. Science 360, 1120–1124 (2018).
Clément, G. et al. Devonian tetrapod from western Europe. Nature 427, 412–413 (2004).
Olive, S. et al. New discoveries of tetrapods (ichthyostegid-like and whatcheeriid-like) in the Famennian (Late Devonian) localities of Strud and Becco (Belgium). Palaeontology 59, 827–840 (2016).
Shubin, N. H., Daeschler, E. B. & Coates, M. I. The early evolution of the tetrapod humerus. Science 304, 90–93 (2004).
Daeschler, E. B., Clack, J. A. & Shubin, N. H. Late Devonian tetrapod remains from Red Hill, Pennsylvania, USA: how much diversity? Acta Zool. 90, 306–317 (2009).
Säve-Söderbergh, G. Preliminary note on Devonian stegocephalians from East Greenland. Medd. Gronl. 94, 1–107 (1932).
Jarvik, E. On the fish-like tail in the ichthyostegid stegocephalians with descriptions of a new stegocephalian and a new crossopterygian from the Upper Devonian of East Greenland. Medd. Gronl. 114, 1–90 (1952).
Jarvik, E. The Devonian Tetrapod Ichthyostega (Fossils & Strata no. 40) (Scandinavian Univ. Press, 1996).
Ahlberg, P. E., Clack, J. A. & Blom, H. The axial skeleton of the Devonian tetrapod Ichthyostega. Nature 437, 137–140 (2005).
Clack, J. A. et al. A uniquely specialized ear in a very early tetrapod. Nature 425, 65–69 (2003).
Callier, V., Clack, J. A. & Ahlberg, P. E. Contrasting developmental trajectories in the earliest known tetrapod forelimbs. Science 324, 364–367 (2009).
Clack, J. A. Discovery of the earliest-known tetrapod stapes. Nature 342, 425–427 (1989).
Clack, J. A. Acanthostega gunnari, a Devonian tetrapod from Greenland: the snout, palate and ventral parts of the braincase. Medd. Gronl. Geosci. 31, 1–24 (1994).
Clack, J. A. Earliest known tetrapod braincase and the evolution of the stapes and fenestra ovalis. Nature 369, 392–394 (1994).
Clack, J. A. The neurocranium of Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik and the evolution of the otic region in tetrapods. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 122, 61–97 (1998).
Clack, J. A. A revised reconstruction of the dermal skull roof of Acanthostega gunnari, an early tetrapod from the Late Devonian. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 93, 163–165 (2002).
Coates, M. I. & Clack, J. A. Polydactyly in the earliest known tetrapod limbs. Nature 347, 66–69 (1990).
Coates, M. I. & Clack, J. A. Fish-like gills and breathing in the earliest known tetrapod. Nature 352, 234–236 (1991).
Coates, M. I. The Devonian tetrapod Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik: postcranial anatomy, basal tetrapod interrelationships and patterns of skeletal evolution. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 87, 363–421 (1996).
Ahlberg, P. E. & Clack, J. A. Lower jaws, lower tetrapods – a review based on the Devonian genus Acanthostega. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 89, 11–46 (1998).
Porro, L. B., Rayfield, E. J. & Clack, J. A. Descriptive anatomy and three-dimensional reconstruction of the skull of the early tetrapod Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik, 1952. PLoS ONE 10, e0118882 (2015).
Ahlberg, P. E., Clack, J. A., Lukševičs, E., Blom, H. & Zupiņs, I. Ventastega curonica and the origin of tetrapod morphology. Nature 453, 1199–1204 (2008).
Lebedev, O. A. & Clack, J. A. Upper Devonian tetrapods from Andreyevka, Tula Region, Russia. Palaeontology 36, 721–734 (1993).
Lebedev, O. A. & Coates, M. I. The postcranial skeleton of the Devonian tetrapod Tulerpeton curtum. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 114, 307–348 (1995).
Niedźwiedzki, G., Szrek, P., Narkiewicz, K., Narkiewicz, M. & Ahlberg, P. E. Tetrapod trackways from the early Middle Devonian period of Poland. Nature 463, 43–48 (2010).
Stössel, I., Williams, E. A. & Higgs, K. T. Ichnology and depositional environment of the Middle Devonian Valentia Island tetrapod trackways, south-west Ireland. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 462, 16–40 (2016).
Beznosov, P. Sosnogorsk Formation – a new local stratigraphic unit of the Upper Devonian from South Timan [in Russian]. Geologiya i mineral’nye resursy evropeyskogo servero-vostoka Rossii: materialy XV geologicheskogo s’yezda Respubliki Komi 2, 9–12 (2009).
Schultze, H.-P. & Arsenault, M. The panderichthyid fish Elpistostege: a close relative of tetrapods? Palaeontology 28, 293–310 (1985).
Daeschler, E. B., Shubin, N. H. & Jenkins, F. A. Jr. A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan. Nature 440, 757–763 (2006).
Jarvik, E. Basic Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates Vol. 1 (Academic, 1980).
Ahlberg, P. E., Clack, J. A. & Lukševičs, E. Rapid braincase evolution between Panderichthys and the earliest tetrapods. Nature 381, 61–64 (1996).
Downs, J. P., Daeschler, E. B., Jenkins, F. A. Jr & Shubin, N. H. The cranial endoskeleton of Tiktaalik roseae. Nature 455, 925–929 (2008).
Ahlberg, P. E. Postcranial stem tetrapod remains from the Devonian of Scat Craig, Morayshire, Scotland. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 122, 99–141 (1998).
Vorobyeva, E. I. The shoulder girdle of Panderichthys rhombolepis (Gross) (Crossopterygii); Upper Devonian; Latvia. Geobios 28, 285–288 (1995).
Shubin, N. H., Daeschler, E. B. & Jenkins, F. A. Jr. The pectoral fin of Tiktaalik roseae and the origin of the tetrapod limb. Nature 440, 764–771 (2006).
Lukševičs, E., Beznosov, P. & Stūris, V. A new assessment of the Late Devonian antiarchan fish Bothriolepis leptocheira from South Timan (Russia) and the biotic crisis near the Frasnian–Famennian boundary. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 62, 97–119 (2017).
Sanchez, S., Tafforeau, P., Clack, J. A. & Ahlberg, P. E. Life history of the stem tetrapod Acanthostega revealed by synchrotron microtomography. Nature 537, 408–411 (2016).
MacIver, M. A., Schmitz, L., Mugan, U., Murphey, T. D. & Mobley, C. D. Massive increase in visual range preceded the origin of terrestrial vertebrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E2375–E2384 (2017).
Brazeau, M. D. & Ahlberg, P. E. Tetrapod-like middle ear architecture in a Devonian fish. Nature 439, 318–321 (2006).
Chen, D. et al. A partial lower jaw of a tetrapod from “Romer’s Gap”. Earth Env. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 108, 55–65 (2018).
Wilkinson, M. Majority-rule reduced consensus trees and their use in bootstrapping. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 437–444 (1996).
Lloyd, G. T. Estimating morphological diversity and tempo with discrete character-taxon matrices: implementation, challenges, progress, and future directions. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 118, 131–151 (2016).
Swofford, D. L. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) Version 4 (Sinauer, 2003).
Wilkinson, M., Peres-Neto, P. R., Foster, P. G. & Moncrieff, C. B. Type 1 error rates of the parsimony permutation tail probability test. Syst. Biol. 51, 524–527 (2002).
Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791 (1985).
Farris, J. S., Albert, V. A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D. & Kluge, A. G. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12, 99–124 (1996).
Goloboff, P. A. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9, 83–91 (1993).
Congreve, C. R. & Lamsdell, J. C. Implied weighting and its utility in palaeontological datasets: a study using modelled phylogenetic matrices. Palaeontology 59, 447–462 (2016).
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574 (2003).
Gelman, A. & Rubin, D. B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7, 457–472 (1992).
Blom, H. Taxonomic revision of the Late Devonian tetrapod Ichthyostega from East Greenland. Palaeontology 48, 111–134 (2005).
Ahlberg, P. E., Friedman, M. & Blom, H. New light on the earliest known tetrapod jaw. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 25, 720–724 (2005).
Robinson, J. The Evolution of the Early Tetrapod Middle Ear and Associated Structures. PhD thesis, Univ. College London (2006).
We thank Y. Gatovsky, A. Zhuravlev and D. Ponomarev for their support of the project, and the dig crews of the 2009–2012 excavations for all their hard work. A. Ivanov identified the first tetrapod mandible from Sosnogorsk, in the Chernyshov Collection. P.A.B. acknowledges the support of National Geographic Society grant 9099-12 and UNDP/GEF project no. 00059042. E.L. acknowledges the support of Latvian Council of Science grant Z-6153-110. P.E.A. acknowledges the support of a Wallenberg Scholarship from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Peer review information Nature thanks Nadia Fröbisch and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Extended data figures and tables
a, b, Maps of increasing resolution, showing the location of Sosnogorsk within northwest Russia. The box around Ukhta and Sosnogorsk in a indicates the region shown in b. In b, the brown belt that extends from north to south indicates the outcrop of Famennian (D3fm) deposits in the region, and the yellow arrow points to the Sosnogorsk fossil site (Sosnovskiy Geological Monument). c, Stratigraphic column through the Sosnogorsk Formation, and part of the overlying marine Izhma Formation. Note the possible position of the Frasnian–Famennian boundary (D3f–D3fm) in the lower part of the Sosnogorsk Formation. The vertebrate-bearing part of the formation is shown in detail on the right; the tetrapod-bearing level is indicated with a red vertical bar. d, General view of outcrop no. 20 (Sosnovskiy Geological Monument) from the opposite bank of the Izhma River. 1, limestone; 2, dolomite; 3, clay; 4, nodular limestone; 5, scree; and 6, landslide. D3sn, Sosnogorsk Formation, D3iž, Izhma Formation. The distance A′–B′ indicates the area of the main excavation that took place in 2010–2012. e, Main excavation. The distance A–B indicates the area in which all of the tetrapod bones were found, during the excavation in 2012. The photograph was taken on 2 August 2012. f, Sketch map of the main excavation (2012), showing the distribution of tetrapod bones within the bed. The cluster numbers are indicated in orange. The background maps in a and b were taken from https://yandex.ru/maps; the geological features of b were taken from the open-access State Geological Map at https://vsegei.ru/.
This figure shows all of the complete and near-complete frontals of Parmastega (eight out of nine known frontals) to scale, oriented with anterior at the top and aligned on the centre of radiation (horizontal line). The right frontals have been reversed so that all bones have the appearance of left frontals. From left to right, the specimens are IG KSC 705/3 (reversed), IG KSC 705/40, IG KSC 705/44 (reversed), IG KSC 705/43, IG KSC 705/45, IG KSC 705/18 (reversed), IG KSC 705/42 and IG KSC 705/41. Scale bar, 10 mm.
a, b, Diagrammatic images showing the associated bones (in orange) of two individual skulls. a, The holotype IG KSC 705/1. b, The largest individual, IG KSC 705/2–705/14 and IG KSC 705/99. In the lateral view of b, the preserved frontal and nasal are shown (even though they are in fact on the other side of the skull). c, Diagrammatic representation of the number of specimens of different bones in the sample.
Silhouette reconstructions of the heads of known, reconstructable Devonian tetrapods. Reconstructions are drawn to the same scale. The lower jaw of Elginerpeton—the largest known Devonian tetrapod, and for which the skull cannot be reconstructed—is also included. All reconstructions except for Acanthostega are assembled from more than one specimen; the specimen numbers indicate the specimen used to determine the scale. The right-hand column shows the largest known individuals. The left-hand column shows the smallest individuals of Parmastega (all from Sosnogorsk) and Ichthyostega (based on the entire East Greenland collection, reviewed in ref. 61). Note the similarity in size range despite the very different nature of the samples. Ventastega and Acanthostega show narrow size ranges, which are not illustrated. Reconstructions modified from the following sources: Ichthyostega, ref. 19; Acanthostega, ref. 31; Ventastega, ref. 32; Elginerpeton, ref. 62.
Plot of orbit length versus skull length for a range of tetrapodomorph fishes, elpistostegids, Devonian tetrapods and post-Devonian tetrapods. Data are taken from ref. 47, except Parmastega, which is based on the largest known individual (Extended Data Fig. 3). Post-Devonian tetrapods from ref. 47 not included in our phylogenetic analysis are not shown. Ac, Acanthostega; Ba b, Baphetes bohemicus; Ba k, Baphetes kirkbyi; Ba l, Baphetes lintonensis; Bal, Balanerpeton; Be, Beelarongia; Br, Bruehnopteron; Cab, Cabonnichthys; Can, Canowindra; Cl, Cladarosymblema; Cra, Crassigyrinus; Den, Dendrerpeton; Ed, Edenopteron; Elp, Elpistostege; Eoh, Eoherpeton; Eu, Eusthenopteron; Gog, Gogonasus; Goo, Gooloogongia; Gre, Greererpeton; Gy, Gyroptychius; He, Heddleichthys; Ich, Ichthyostega; Ko, Koharalepis; Man, Mandageria; Mar, Marsdenichthys; Meg, Megalocephalus; Oss, Ossinodus; Ost, Osteolepis; Pal, Palatinichthys; Pan, Panderichthys; Par, Parmastega; Ped, Pederpes; Pro, Proterogyrinus; Scr, Screbinodus; Sil, Silvanerpeton; Tik, Tiktaalik; Tin, Tinirau; Ven, Ventastega; Wha, Whatcheeria.
a, Comparative diagram of the otoccipial regions of Parmastega, Ichthyostega (new reconstruction, based on data from refs. 18,20), Ventastega (modified from ref. 32) and Acanthostega (modified from ref. 20, semicircular canals modified from ref. 63) in ventral view. The basioccipital–exoccipital complex is preserved only in Ichthyostega and Acanthostega; in these genera the inner ear is shown only on one side. Drawings are scaled to the same length from pineal region to posterior margin of otic capsule. The inner ear is represented by the grooves for the anterior and posterior oblique semicircular canals, except in Ichthyostega in which it is represented by the sacculus (modified from ref. 20). The braincases are arranged by morphological similarity, so that a minimum number of transformations are required along each branch. b, Consensus phylogeny from the analyses presented in this paper. The phylogenetic topology does not match the similarity dendrogram.
a, Unweighted strict-consensus tree. b, Unweighted Adams consensus tree. c, Single tree resulting from reweighting characters by the rescaled consistency index. d, Bayesian tree, with credibility values at nodes. e, Maximum-agreement subtree of unweighted parsimony analysis. f, Strict consensus of K-weighted trees. g, Maximum-agreement subtree of K-weighted parsimony analysis. h, Adams consensus of all trees from all K-weighted analyses.
Comparison in left lateral view of spectacled caiman (Caiman crocodilus) on the left and Parmastega on the right, drawn to the same size, showing the inferred similar cruising posture at the surface. Note the difference in the positions of the nostrils. The caiman image is based on a computed tomography scan of a skull in the Digimorph Archive (http://www.digimorph.org/specimens/Caiman_crocodilus/).
a, Dentary of Parmastega (IG KSC 705-67) fitted against palatal reconstruction to show the difference in curvature between the spade-shaped snout and the relatively straight dentary. b, Lateral view of skull reconstruction of Parmastega with closed mouth, showing mismatch in curvature between upper and lower jaws. c, Composite reconstruction of Ventastega, superimposing lower jaw rami (from ref. 30) on skull reconstruction (from ref. 32), showing shape relationship similar to a. Not to scale.
SI Table 1: specimens of Parmastega registered to Institute of Geology, Komi Science Centre. Illustrated with thumbnail photos of specimens.
SI Table 2: complete list of the known bones of Parmastega.
SI character list: character list for phylogenetic matrix.
SI character matrix: character matrix for phylogenetic analysis.
SI NEXUS: NEXUS version of character matrix.
SI prmrbayesoutput: output of Bayesian analysis.
About this article
Cite this article
Beznosov, P.A., Clack, J.A., Lukševičs, E. et al. Morphology of the earliest reconstructable tetrapod Parmastega aelidae. Nature 574, 527–531 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1636-y
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2021)