Energy-intensive thermochemical processes within chemical manufacturing are a major contributor to global CO2 emissions. With the increasing push for sustainability, the scientific community is striving to develop renewable energy-powered electrochemical technologies in lieu of CO2-emitting fossil-fuel-driven methods. However, to fully electrify chemical manufacturing, it is imperative to expand the scope of electrosynthetic technologies, particularly through the innovation of reactions involving nitrogen-based reactants. This Review focuses on a rapidly emerging area, namely the formation of C–N bonds through heterogeneous electrocatalysis. The C–N bond motif is found in many fertilizers (such as urea) as well as commodity and fine chemicals (with functional groups such as amines and amides). The ability to generate C–N bonds from reactants such as CO2, NO3– or N2 would provide sustainable alternatives to the thermochemical routes used at present. We start by examining thermochemical, enzymatic and molecular catalytic systems for C–N bond formation, identifying how concepts from these can be translated to heterogeneous electrocatalysis. Next, we discuss successful heterogeneous electrocatalytic systems and highlight promising research directions. Finally, we discuss the remaining questions and knowledge gaps and thus set the trajectory for future advances in heterogeneous electrocatalytic formation of C–N bonds.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only 9,27 € per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Edenhofer, O. et al. (eds) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (IPCC, 2014).
International Energy Agency (IEA) Technology Roadmap — Energy and GHG Reductions in the Chemical Industry via Catalytic Processes (IEA, 2013).
Bogdanov, D. et al. Low-cost renewable electricity as the key driver of the global energy transition towards sustainability. Energy 227, 120467 (2021).
Stamenkovic, V. R., Strmcnik, D., Lopes, P. P. & Markovic, N. M. Energy and fuels from electrochemical interfaces. Nat. Mater. 16, 57–69 (2017).
Ross, M. B. et al. Designing materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide recycling. Nat. Catal. 2, 648–658 (2019).
Masel, R. I. et al. An industrial perspective on catalysts for low-temperature CO2 electrolysis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 118–128 (2021).
Lagadec, M. F. & Grimaud, A. Water electrolysers with closed and open electrochemical systems. Nat. Mater. 19, 1140–1150 (2020).
Shin, H., Hansen, K. U. & Jiao, F. Techno-economic assessment of low-temperature carbon dioxide electrolysis. Nat. Sustain. 4, 911–919 (2021).
De Luna, P. et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364, eaav3506 (2019).
Schiffer, Z. J. & Manthiram, K. Electrification and decarbonization of the chemical industry. Joule 1, 10–14 (2017).
Amines Market: Information by Product Type (Ethylene Amine, Alkyl Amines, Fatty Amines, Specialty Amines, and Ethanol Amines), Application (Water Treatment, Cleaning Products, Agriculture, Personal Care, Petroleum, Paint & Coatings, Pharmaceuticals, and Others) and Region — Forecast till 2030. https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/amines-market-1991 (Market Research Future, 2021).
Global Urea Market https://www.expertmarketresearch.com/reports/urea-market (Expert Market Research, 2021).
Fernández, L. Global production capacity of carbamide 2018–2030. Statista https://www.statista.com/statistics/1063689/global-urea-production-capacity/ (2021).
Roose, P., Eller, K., Henkes, E., Rossbacher, R. & Höke, H. Amines, aliphatic. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Wiley, 2015).
Meessen, J. H. & Petersen, H. Urea. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Wiley, 2000).
Appl, M. Ammonia, 2. Production processes. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Wiley, 2011).
Zhang, H., Sun, Z. & Hu, Y. H. Steam reforming of methane: current states of catalyst design and process upgrading. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 149, 111330 (2021).
Smith, C., Hill, A. K. & Torrente-Murciano, L. Current and future role of Haber–Bosch ammonia in a carbon-free energy landscape. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 331–344 (2020).
Bicer, Y., Dincer, I., Zamfirescu, C., Vezina, G. & Raso, F. Comparative life cycle assessment of various ammonia production methods. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 1379–1395 (2016).
Wyndorps, J., Ostovari, H. & von der Assen, N. Is electrochemical CO2 reduction the future technology for power-to-chemicals? An environmental comparison with H2-based pathways. Sustain. Energy Fuels 5, 5748–5761 (2021).
Kim, J. E., Choi, S., Balamurugan, M., Jang, J. H. & Nam, K. T. Electrochemical C–N bond formation for sustainable amine synthesis. Trends Chem. 2, 1004–1019 (2020).
Wang, M. et al. Can sustainable ammonia synthesis pathways compete with fossil-fuel based Haber–Bosch processes? Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 2535–2548 (2021).
Brazdil, J. F. Acrylonitrile. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Wiley, 2012).
Torborg, C. & Beller, M. Recent applications of palladium-catalyzed coupling reactions in the pharmaceutical, agrochemical, and fine chemical industries. Adv. Synth. Catal. 351, 3027–3043 (2009).
Abdel-Magid, A. F., Carson, K. G., Harris, B. D., Maryanoff, C. A. & Shah, R. D. Reductive amination of aldehydes and ketones with sodium triacetoxyborohydride. Studies on direct and indirect reductive amination procedures1. J. Org. Chem. 61, 3849–3862 (1996).
Goddard, W. A., Chenoweth, K., Pudar, S., van Duin, A. C. T. & Cheng, M.-J. Structures, mechanisms, and kinetics of selective ammoxidation and oxidation of propane over multi-metal oxide catalysts. Top. Catal. 50, 2–18 (2008).
Luo, D. et al. Intrinsic mechanism of active metal dependent primary amine selectivity in the reductive amination of carbonyl compounds. J. Catal. 395, 293–301 (2021).
Irrgang, T. & Kempe, R. Transition-metal-catalyzed reductive amination employing hydrogen. Chem. Rev. 120, 9583–9674 (2020).
Kita, Y., Kuwabara, M., Yamadera, S., Kamata, K. & Hara, M. Effects of ruthenium hydride species on primary amine synthesis by direct amination of alcohols over a heterogeneous Ru catalyst. Chem. Sci. 11, 9884–9890 (2020).
Baiker, A. & Kijenski, J. Catalytic synthesis of higher aliphatic amines from the corresponding alcohols. Catal. Rev. 27, 653–697 (1985).
Sukhorukov, A. Y. Catalytic reductive amination of aldehydes and ketones with nitro compounds: new light on an old reaction. Front. Chem. 8, 215 (2020).
Sharma, M., Mangas-Sanchez, J., Turner, N. J. & Grogan, G. NAD(P)H-dependent dehydrogenases for the asymmetric reductive amination of ketones: structure, mechanism, evolution and application. Adv. Synth. Catal. 359, 2011–2025 (2017).
Slabu, I., Galman, J. L., Lloyd, R. C. & Turner, N. J. Discovery, engineering, and synthetic application of transaminase biocatalysts. ACS Catal. 7, 8263–8284 (2017).
Peisach, D., Chipman, D. M., Van Ophem, P. W., Manning, J. M. & Ringe, D. Crystallographic study of steps along the reaction pathway of d-amino acid aminotransferase. Biochemistry 37, 4958–4967 (1998).
Kirsch, J. F. et al. Mechanism of action of aspartate aminotransferase proposed on the basis of its spatial structure. J. Mol. Biol. 174, 497–525 (1984).
Paul, F., Patt, J. & Hartwig, J. F. Palladium-catalyzed formation of carbon-nitrogen bonds. Reaction intermediates and catalyst improvements in the hetero cross-coupling of aryl halides and tin amides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 5969–5970 (1994).
Guram, A. S. & Buchwald, S. L. Palladium-catalyzed aromatic aminations with in situ generated aminostannanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 7901–7902 (1994).
Surry, D. S. & Buchwald, S. L. Dialkylbiaryl phosphines in Pd-catalyzed amination: a user’s guide. Chem. Sci. 2, 27–50 (2011).
Goldberg, I. Ueber Phenylirungen bei Gegenwart von Kupfer als Katalysator. [in German]. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 39, 1691–1692 (1906).
Evano, G., Blanchard, N. & Toumi, M. Copper-mediated coupling reactions and their applications in natural products and designed biomolecules synthesis. Chem. Rev. 108, 3054–3131 (2008).
Chan, D. M. T., Monaco, K. L., Wang, R.-P. & Winters, M. P. New N- and O-arylations with phenylboronic acids and cupric acetate. Tetrahedron Lett. 39, 2933–2936 (1998).
Lam, P. Y. S. et al. New aryl/heteroaryl C–N bond cross-coupling reactions via arylboronic acid/cupric acetate arylation. Tetrahedron Lett. 39, 2941–2944 (1998).
West, M. J., Fyfe, J. W. B., Vantourout, J. C. & Watson, A. J. B. Mechanistic development and recent applications of the Chan–Lam amination. Chem. Rev. 119, 12491–12523 (2019).
Giri, R. et al. Mechanism of the Ullmann biaryl ether synthesis catalyzed by complexes of anionic ligands: evidence for the reaction of iodoarenes with ligated anionic CuI intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 793–806 (2018).
Bähn, S. et al. The catalytic amination of alcohols. ChemCatChem 3, 1853–1864 (2011).
Müller, T. E., Hultzsch, K. C., Yus, M., Foubelo, F. & Tada, M. Hydroamination: direct addition of amines to alkenes and alkynes. Chem. Rev. 108, 3795–3892 (2008).
Park, Y., Kim, Y. & Chang, S. Transition metal-catalyzed C–H amination: scope, mechanism, and applications. Chem. Rev. 117, 9247–9301 (2017).
Louillat, M.-L. & Patureau, F. W. Oxidative C–H amination reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 901–910 (2014).
Hirosawa, C., Wakasa, N. & Fuchikami, T. Hydrogenation of amides by the use of bimetallic catalysts consisting of group 8 to 10, and group 6 or 7 metals. Tetrahedron Lett. 37, 6749–6752 (1996).
Beamson, G., Papworth, A. J., Philipps, C., Smith, A. M. & Whyman, R. Selective hydrogenation of amides using ruthenium/molybdenum catalysts. Adv. Synth. Catal. 352, 869–883 (2010).
Cabrero-Antonino, J. R., Adam, R., Papa, V. & Beller, M. Homogeneous and heterogeneous catalytic reduction of amides and related compounds using molecular hydrogen. Nat. Commun. 11, 3893 (2020).
Arnold, K. et al. To catalyze or not to catalyze? Insight into direct amide bond formation from amines and carboxylic acids under thermal and catalyzed conditions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 348, 813–820 (2006).
Hoang, L. T. M. et al. An azobenzene-containing metal–organic framework as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for direct amidation of benzoic acids: synthesis of bioactive compounds. Chem. Commun. 51, 17132–17135 (2015).
Wang, X. Challenges and outlook for catalytic direct amidation reactions. Nat. Catal. 2, 98–102 (2019).
Fu, N., Sauer Gregory, S., Saha, A., Loo, A. & Lin, S. Metal-catalyzed electrochemical diazidation of alkenes. Science 357, 575–579 (2017).
Corbin, D. R., Schwarz, S. & Sonnichsen, G. C. Methylamines synthesis: a review. Catal. Today 37, 71–102 (1997).
Chen, Z., Zeng, H., Gong, H., Wang, H. & Li, C.-J. Palladium-catalyzed reductive coupling of phenols with anilines and amines: efficient conversion of phenolic lignin model monomers and analogues to cyclohexylamines. Chem. Sci. 6, 4174–4178 (2015).
Mazzei, L., Musiani, F. & Ciurli, S. The structure-based reaction mechanism of urease, a nickel dependent enzyme: tale of a long debate. JBIC 25, 829–845 (2020).
Fang, X. & Wang, C.-J. Recent advances in asymmetric organocatalysis mediated by bifunctional amine–thioureas bearing multiple hydrogen-bonding donors. Chem. Commun. 51, 1185–1197 (2015).
Nam, D.-H. et al. Molecular enhancement of heterogeneous CO2 reduction. Nat. Mater. 19, 266–276 (2020).
Kim, C. et al. Tailored catalyst microenvironments for CO2 electroreduction to multicarbon products on copper using bilayer ionomer coatings. Nat. Energy 6, 1026–1034 (2021).
Wakerley, D. et al. Bio-inspired hydrophobicity promotes CO2 reduction on a Cu surface. Nat. Mater. 18, 1222–1227 (2019).
Okimoto, M. & Chiba, T. Electrochemical transformations of aldehydes into methyl carboxylates and nitriles. J. Org. Chem. 53, 218–219 (1988).
Shibata, M., Yoshida, K. & Furuya, N. Electrochemical synthesis of urea at gas-diffusion electrodes: IV. Simultaneous reduction of carbon dioxide and nitrate ions with various metal catalysts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, 2348–2353 (1998).
Shibata, M., Yoshida, K. & Furuya, N. Electrochemical synthesis of urea at gas-diffusion electrodes: III. Simultaneous reduction of carbon dioxide and nitrite ions with various metal catalysts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, 595–600 (1998).
Shibata, M., Yoshida, K. & Furuya, N. Electrochemical synthesis of urea at gas-diffusion electrodes: Part II. Simultaneous reduction of carbon dioxide and nitrite ions at Cu, Ag and Au catalysts. J. Electroanal. Chem. 442, 67–72 (1998).
Shibata, M. & Furuya, N. Electrochemical synthesis of urea at gas-diffusion electrodes: Part VI. Simultaneous reduction of carbon dioxide and nitrite ions with various metallophthalocyanine catalysts. J. Electroanal. Chem. 507, 177–184 (2001).
Greenburg, A., Breneman, C. M. & Liebman, J. F. (eds) The Amide Linkage: Structural Significance in Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Materials Science (Wiley, 2000).
Jouny, M. et al. Formation of carbon–nitrogen bonds in carbon monoxide electrolysis. Nat. Chem. 11, 846–851 (2019). This is the first work to electrochemically synthesize amides from CO2 and CO.
Li, J. & Kornienko, N. Electrochemically driven C–N bond formation from CO2 and ammonia at the triple-phase boundary. Chem. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SC06590D (2022).
Chen, C., He, N. & Wang, S. Electrocatalytic C–N coupling for urea synthesis. Small Sci. 1, 2100070 (2021).
Feng, Y. et al. Te-doped Pd nanocrystal for electrochemical urea production by efficiently coupling carbon dioxide reduction with nitrite reduction. Nano Lett. 20, 8282–8289 (2020).
Meng, N., Huang, Y., Liu, Y., Yu, Y. & Zhang, B. Electrosynthesis of urea from nitrite and CO2 over oxygen vacancy-rich ZnO porous nanosheets. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2, 100378 (2021).
Saravanakumar, D., Song, J., Lee, S., Hur, N. H. & Shin, W. Electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide and nitrate ions to urea by a titania–nafion composite electrode. ChemSusChem 10, 3999–4003 (2017).
Cao, N. et al. Oxygen vacancies enhanced cooperative electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide and nitrite ions to urea. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 577, 109–114 (2020).
Lv, C. et al. Selective electrocatalytic synthesis of urea with nitrate and carbon dioxide. Nat. Sustain. 4, 868–876 (2021).
Chen, C. et al. Coupling N2 and CO2 in H2O to synthesize urea under ambient conditions. Nat. Chem. 12, 717–724 (2020). This work comprehensively investigates N2 and CO2 coupling to form urea.
Yuan, M. et al. Unveiling electrochemical urea synthesis by co-activation of CO2 and N2 with Mott–Schottky heterostructure catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 10910–10918 (2021).
Yuan, M. et al. Electrochemical C–N coupling with perovskite hybrids toward efficient urea synthesis. Chem. Sci. 12, 6048–6058 (2021).
Yuan, M. et al. Highly selective electroreduction of N2 and CO2 to urea over artificial frustrated Lewis pairs. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 6605–6615 (2021).
Yuan, M. et al. Artificial frustrated Lewis pairs facilitating the electrochemical N2 and CO2 conversion to urea. Chem. Catal. 2, 309–320 (2022). This work unveils a new frustrated Lewis pair strategy to couple N2 and CO2.
Nitopi, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119, 7610–7672 (2019).
Wu, Y., Jiang, Z., Lu, X., Liang, Y. & Wang, H. Domino electroreduction of CO2 to methanol on a molecular catalyst. Nature 575, 639–642 (2019).
Wu, Y., Jiang, Z., Lin, Z., Liang, Y. & Wang, H. Direct electrosynthesis of methylamine from carbon dioxide and nitrate. Nat. Sustain. 4, 725–730 (2021). This work shows how *CH2O can be intercepted en route to methanol production to instead generate methylamine.
Rooney, C. L., Wu, Y., Tao, Z. & Wang, H. Electrochemical reductive N-methylation with CO2 enabled by a molecular catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19983–19991 (2021).
Tao, Z. et al. Cascade electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide and nitrate to ethylamine. J. Energy Chem. 65, 367–370 (2022).
Kim, J. E. et al. Electrochemical synthesis of glycine from oxalic acid and nitrate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 21943–21951 (2021).
Paris, A. R. & Bocarsly, A. B. High-efficiency conversion of CO2 to oxalate in water is possible using a Cr-Ga oxide electrocatalyst. ACS Catal. 9, 2324–2333 (2019).
Gluhoi, A. C., Mărginean, P. & Stănescu, U. Effect of supports on the activity of nickel catalysts in acetonitrile hydrogenation. Appl. Catal. A 294, 208–214 (2005).
Iwasa, N., Yoshikawa, M. & Arai, M. Selective hydrogenation of acetonitrile to ethylamine using palladium-based alloy catalysts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4, 5414–5420 (2002).
Verhaak, M. J. F. M., van Dillen, A. J. & Geus, J. W. The selective hydrogenation of acetonitrile on supported nickel catalysts. Catal. Lett. 26, 37–53 (1994).
Li, H., Wu, Y., Luo, H., Wang, M. & Xu, Y. Liquid phase hydrogenation of acetonitrile to ethylamine over the Co–B amorphous alloy catalyst. J. Catal. 214, 15–25 (2003).
Braos-García, P., García-Sancho, C., Infantes-Molina, A., Rodríguez-Castellón, E. & Jiménez-López, A. Bimetallic Ru/Ni supported catalysts for the gas phase hydrogenation of acetonitrile. Appl. Catal. A 381, 132–144 (2010).
Xia, R. et al. Electrochemical reduction of acetonitrile to ethylamine. Nat. Commun. 12, 1949 (2021). This work demonstrates the key factors behind electrochemical acetonitrile hydrogenation.
Zhang, D. et al. Highly efficient electrochemical hydrogenation of acetonitrile to ethylamine for primary amine synthesis and promising hydrogen storage. Chem. Catal. 1, 393–406 (2021).
Zhang, Y. & Kornienko, N. C≡N triple bond cleavage via trans-membrane hydrogenation. Chem. Catal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.checat.2022.02.005 (2022).
Brotzel, F., Chu, Y. C. & Mayr, H. Nucleophilicities of primary and secondary amines in water. J. Org. Chem. 72, 3679–3688 (2007).
Tauster, S. J. Strong metal–support interactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 20, 389–394 (1987).
Möller, T. et al. The product selectivity zones in gas diffusion electrodes during the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 5995–6006 (2021).
Zhuang, T.-T. et al. Copper nanocavities confine intermediates for efficient electrosynthesis of C3 alcohol fuels from carbon monoxide. Nat. Catal. 1, 946–951 (2018).
Gorte, R. J. Temperature-programmed desorption for the characterization of oxide catalysts. Catal. Today 28, 405–414 (1996).
Handoko, A. D., Wei, F., Jenndy, Yeo, B. S. & Seh, Z. W. Understanding heterogeneous electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction through operando techniques. Nat. Catal. 1, 922–934 (2018).
Heidary, N., Ly, K. H. & Kornienko, N. Probing CO2 conversion chemistry on nanostructured surfaces with operando vibrational spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 19, 4817–4826 (2019).
Burdyny, T. & Smith, W. A. CO2 reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes and why catalytic performance must be assessed at commercially relevant conditions. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1442–1453 (2019).
Lu, X. et al. In situ observation of the pH gradient near the gas diffusion electrode of CO2 reduction in alkaline electrolyte. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 15438–15444 (2020).
Chen, X. et al. Electrochemical CO2-to-ethylene conversion on polyamine-incorporated Cu electrodes. Nat. Catal. 4, 20–27 (2021).
Zhu, Y., Wang, J., Chu, H., Chu, Y.-C. & Chen, H. M. In situ/operando studies for designing next-generation electrocatalysts. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1281–1291 (2020).
Hahn, C. et al. Engineering Cu surfaces for the electrocatalytic conversion of CO2: controlling selectivity toward oxygenates and hydrocarbons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5918 (2017).
Huang, Y., Handoko, A. D., Hirunsit, P. & Yeo, B. S. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 using copper single-crystal surfaces: effects of CO* coverage on the selective formation of ethylene. ACS Catal. 7, 1749–1756 (2017).
Scholten, F., Nguyen, K.-L. C., Bruce, J. P., Heyde, M. & Roldan Cuenya, B. Identifying structure–selectivity correlations in the electrochemical reduction of CO2: a comparison of well-ordered atomically clean and chemically etched copper single-crystal surfaces. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 60, 19169–19175 (2021).
Jung, W. & Hwang, Y. J. Material strategies in the electrochemical nitrate reduction reaction to ammonia production. Mater. Chem. Front. 5, 6803–6823 (2021).
Wang, H., Zhu, Q.-L., Zou, R. & Xu, Q. Metal–organic frameworks for energy applications. Chem 2, 52–80 (2017).
Zhang, H., Nai, J., Yu, L. & Lou, X. W. Metal–organic-framework-based materials as platforms for renewable energy and environmental applications. Joule 1, 77–107 (2017).
Bullock, R. M., Das, A. K. & Appel, A. M. Surface immobilization of molecular electrocatalysts for energy conversion. Chem. Eur. J. 23, 7626–7641 (2017).
Kuznetsov, D. A. et al. Tuning redox transitions via inductive effect in metal oxides and complexes, and implications in oxygen electrocatalysis. Joule 2, 225–244 (2018).
Kornienko, N. Enhancing catalysis through substitute-driven redox tuning. Joule 2, 207–209 (2018).
Pedersen, A. et al. Dual-metal atom electrocatalysts: theory, synthesis, characterization, and applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2102715 (2022).
Li, J., Zhang, Y. & Kornienko, N. Heterogeneous electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 promoted by secondary coordination sphere effects. N. J. Chem. 44, 4246–4252 (2020).
Wagner, A., Sahm, C. D. & Reisner, E. Towards molecular understanding of local chemical environment effects in electro- and photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nat. Catal. 3, 775–786 (2020).
Nichols, A. W. & Machan, C. W. Secondary-sphere effects in molecular electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Front. Chem. 7, 397 (2019).
Li, F. et al. Molecular tuning of CO2-to-ethylene conversion. Nature 577, 509–513 (2020).
Han, Z., Kortlever, R., Chen, H.-Y., Peters, J. C. & Agapie, T. CO2 reduction selective for C≥2 products on polycrystalline copper with N-substituted pyridinium additives. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 853–859 (2017).
Sippel, D. et al. A bound reaction intermediate sheds light on the mechanism of nitrogenase. Science 359, 1484–1489 (2018).
Monteiro, M. C. O. et al. Absence of CO2 electroreduction on copper, gold and silver electrodes without metal cations in solution. Nat. Catal. 4, 654–662 (2021).
Resasco, J. et al. Promoter effects of alkali metal cations on the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 11277–11287 (2017).
Wang, M. et al. Salting-out effect promoting highly efficient ambient ammonia synthesis. Nat. Commun. 12, 3198 (2021).
Liu, S. et al. Proton-filtering covalent organic frameworks with superior nitrogen penetration flux promote ambient ammonia synthesis. Nat. Catal. 4, 322–331 (2021).
Dunn, W. W., Aikawa, Y. & Bard, A. J. Heterogeneous photosynthetic production of amino acids at platinum/titanium dioxide suspensions by near ultraviolet light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 6893–6897 (1981).
Liu, K. et al. Electrooxidative para-selective C–H/N–H cross-coupling with hydrogen evolution to synthesize triarylamine derivatives. Nat. Commun. 10, 639 (2019).
Bagherzadeh Mostaghimi, A. H., Al-Attas, T. A., Kibria, M. G. & Siahrostami, S. A review on electrocatalytic oxidation of methane to oxygenates. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 15575–15590 (2020).
Zhang, H., Li, C., Lu, Q., Cheng, M.-J. & Goddard, W. A. Selective activation of propane using intermediates generated during water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 3967–3974 (2021).
Siahrostami, S., Li, G.-L., Viswanathan, V. & Nørskov, J. K. One- or two-electron water oxidation, hydroxyl radical, or H2O2 evolution. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 1157–1160 (2017).
Soloveichik, G. Electrochemical synthesis of ammonia as a potential alternative to the Haber–Bosch process. Nat. Catal. 2, 377–380 (2019).
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority. Hydrogen Factsheet. Hydrogen Production–Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) (NYSERDA, 2005).
Muradov, N. in Compendium of Hydrogen Energy (eds Subramani, V., Basile, A. & Nejat Veziroğlu, T.) 489–522 (Woodhead Publishing, 2015).
Parikh, J., Biswas, C. R. D., Singh, C. & Singh, V. Natural gas requirement by fertilizer sector in India. Energy 34, 954–961 (2009).
Lan, R., Tao, S. & Irvine, J. T. S. A direct urea fuel cell — power from fertiliser and waste. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 438–441 (2010).
Schmidt, O. et al. Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: an expert elicitation study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42, 30470–30492 (2017).
Boggs, B. K., King, R. L. & Botte, G. G. Urea electrolysis: direct hydrogen production from urine. Chem. Commun. 4859–4861 (2009).
Hu, X., Zhu, J., Li, J. & Wu, Q. Urea electrooxidation: current development and understanding of Ni-based catalysts. ChemElectroChem 7, 3211–3228 (2020).
Greenblatt, J. B., Miller, D. J., Ager, J. W., Houle, F. A. & Sharp, I. D. The technical and energetic challenges of separating (photo)electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction products. Joule 2, 381–420 (2018).
Ramdin, M. et al. Electroreduction of CO2/CO to C2 products: process modeling, downstream separation, system integration, and economic analysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60, 17862–17880 (2021).
Ohya, H. & Sourirajan, S. Reverse osmosis separation of urea in aqueous solutions using porous cellulose acetate membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev. 8, 131–142 (1969).
Hou, L. et al. Separation of organic liquid mixture by flexible nanofibrous membranes with precisely tunable wettability. NPG Asia Mater. 8, e334–e334 (2016).
Schmelz, W. J., Hochman, G. & Miller, K. G. Total cost of carbon capture and storage implemented at a regional scale: northeastern and midwestern United States. Interf. Focus. 10, 20190065 (2020).
Jiang, Y. et al. Techno-economic comparison of various process configurations for post-combustion carbon capture using a single-component water-lean solvent. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control. 106, 103279 (2021).
Rosca, V., Duca, M., de Groot, M. T. & Koper, M. T. M. Nitrogen cycle electrocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 109, 2209–2244 (2009).
Quinn, R. DTN retail fertilizer trends. Great American Crop https://greatamericancrop.com/news-resources/article/2021/12/15/dtn-retail-fertilizer-trends (2021).
The authors acknowledge a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2019-05927) and an American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (ACS PRF) New Directions Grant (65093-ND5).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Chemistry thanks Feng Jiao, who co-reviewed with Rong Xia, Marta Costa Figueiredo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Latest FOB International Fertilizer Prices: https://africafertilizer.org/international-prices/
Methyl Amine Price Trend and Forecast: https://www.chemanalyst.com/Pricing-data/methylamine-1178
NOAA Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/
- Electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction
The cathodic reduction of solubilized N2 to NH3. This process requires three electrons per NH3 molecule.
- Electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction
The cathodic reduction of CO2 to various carbon-based products. C1 products such as CO and HCOOH are generally the easiest to produce and require only 2e– but are less valuable than C2 products such as C2H4 or CH3CH2OH.
- Reversible hydrogen electrode
(RHE). A frequently used electrochemical potential scale in which the H+/H2 potential is set to 0 V and the H2O/O2 potential is consequently always 1.23 V.
A measure of the production rate of the desired products divided by that of the total products; can be measured on a per-mole or per-electron basis.
Three-electrode setup in which the counter electrode is placed in a separate chamber separated by an ion-permeable membrane to prevent the re-oxidation or reduction of reaction products.
- Gas diffusion electrode
Electrode configuration comprising hydrophobic, gas-permeable fibres on which a compact conductive carbon layer loaded with the catalyst is situated; enables high current densities to be obtained with poorly soluble gaseous reactants.
- Faradaic efficiency
(FE). The selectivity, on a per-electron basis, of a catalytic system towards a particular reaction product as a function of the total number of electrons that have passed through the circuit; it is often given as a percentage value.
- Temperature-programmed desorption
(TPD). Technique that monitors the desorption of species from a surface as the temperature is gradually increased; useful in comparing the relative binding energies of reactants on different catalysts.
A measure of a catalyst’s turnover rate under a given set of conditions. Most relevant to electrochemical systems are the electrolyte and applied voltage, whereas in thermochemical systems, temperature and pressure are the primary metrics.
Enzyme that reduces N2 to NH3 in nature.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, J., Zhang, Y., Kuruvinashetti, K. et al. Construction of C–N bonds from small-molecule precursors through heterogeneous electrocatalysis. Nat Rev Chem 6, 303–319 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00379-5