Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Efficient electrosynthesis of n-propanol from carbon monoxide using a Ag–Ru–Cu catalyst


The high-energy-density C3 fuel n-propanol is desired from CO2/CO electroreduction, as evidenced by propanol’s high market price per tonne (approximately US$ 1,400–1,600). However, CO electroreduction to n-propanol has shown low selectivity, limited production rates and poor stability. Here we report catalysts, identified using computational screening, that simultaneously facilitate multiple carbon–carbon coupling, stabilize C2 intermediates and promote CO adsorption, all leading to improved n-propanol electrosynthesis. Experimentally we construct the predicted optimal electrocatalyst based on silver–ruthenium co-doped copper. We achieve, at 300 mA cm−2, a high n-propanol Faradaic efficiency of 36% ± 3%, a C2+ Faradaic efficiency of 93% and single-pass CO conversion of 85%. The system exhibits 100 h stable n-propanol electrosynthesis. Technoeconomic analysis based on the performance of the pilot system projects profitability.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: DFT calculations on C1–C1 and C1–C2 coupling.
Fig. 2: Structural and compositional analyses of the Ag–Ru–Cu catalysts.
Fig. 3: CORR performance of different cathode electrodes.
Fig. 4: In situ characterization and n-propanol electrosynthesis in a larger electrolyser.
Fig. 5: Breakdown of the plant-gate levelized cost per tonne of n-propanol and the corresponding quantity of ethanol, ethylene and H2 produced on Ag–Ru–Cu at a current density of 300 mA cm2.

Data availability

All data are available within the paper, Supplementary Information and source data files. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. Jhong, H.-R., Ma, S. & Kenis, P. J. A. Electrochemical conversion of CO2 to useful chemicals: current status, remaining challenges, and future opportunities. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2, 191–199 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wu, Y., Jiang, Z., Lu, X., Liang, Y. & Wang, H. Domino electroreduction of CO2 to methanol on a molecular catalyst. Nature 575, 639–642 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xia, C. et al. Continuous production of pure liquid fuel solutions via electrocatalytic CO2 reduction using solid-electrolyte devices. Nat. Energy 4, 776–785 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dinh, C.-T. et al. CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360, 783–787 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, X. et al. Efficient electrically powered CO2-to-ethanol via suppression of deoxygenation. Nat. Energy 5, 478–486 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jouny, M., Luc, W. & Jiao, F. High-rate electroreduction of carbon monoxide to multi-carbon products. Nat. Catal. 1, 748–755 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jouny, M., Hutchings, G. S. & Jiao, F. Carbon monoxide electroreduction as an emerging platform for carbon utilization. Nat. Catal. 2, 1062–1070 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Service, R. F. Hunt for renewable plastics clears a hurdle. Science 371, 873 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hauch, A. et al. Recent advances in solid oxide cell technology for electrolysis. Science 370, eaba6118 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Küngas, R. Review—electrochemical CO2 reduction for CO production: comparison of low- and high-temperature electrolysis technologies. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167, 044508 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Skafte, T. L. et al. Selective high-temperature CO2 electrolysis enabled by oxidized carbon intermediates. Nat. Energy 4, 846–855 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klabunde, J., Bischoff, C. & Papa, A. J. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Wiley, 2018).

  13. Jouny, M., Luc, W. & Jiao, F. General techno-economic analysis of CO2 electrolysis systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 2165–2177 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bushuyev, O. S. et al. What should we make with CO2 and how can we make it? Joule 2, 825–832 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, J. et al. Copper adparticle enabled selective electrosynthesis of n-propanol. Nat. Commun. 9, 4614 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhuang, T.-T. et al. Copper nanocavities confine intermediates for efficient electrosynthesis of C3 alcohol fuels from carbon monoxide. Nat. Catal 1, 946–951 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pang, Y. et al. Efficient electrocatalytic conversion of carbon monoxide to propanol using fragmented copper. Nat. Catal. 2, 251–258 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Arquer, F. P. G. et al. CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at activities greater than 1 A cm2. Science 367, 661–666 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhuang, T.-T. et al. Steering post-C-C coupling selectivity enables high efficiency electroreduction of carbon dioxide to multi-carbon alcohols. Nat. Catal. 1, 421–428 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang, K. et al. Metal ion cycling of Cu foil for selective C–C coupling in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Catal. 1, 111–119 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao, H., Cheng, T. & Goddard, W. A. Atomistic mechanisms underlying selectivities in C1 and C2 products from electrochemical reduction of CO on Cu (111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 130–136 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N. & Jaramillo, T. F. New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7050–7059 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, X. et al. Efficient upgrading of CO to C3 fuel using asymmetric C–C coupling active sites. Nat. Commun. 10, 5186 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Montoya, J. H., Shi, C., Chan, K. & Nørskov, J. K. Theoretical insights into a CO dimerization mechanism in CO2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2032–2037 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xiao, H., Goddard, W. A., Cheng, T. & Liu, Y. Cu metal embedded in oxidized matrix catalyst to promote CO2 activation and CO dimerization for electrochemical reduction of CO2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6685–6688 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lum, Y., Cheng, T., Goddard, W. A. & Ager, J. W. Electrochemical CO reduction builds solvent water into oxygenate products. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 9337–9340 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hussain, J., Jonsson, H. & Skulason, E. Calculations of product selectivity in electrochemical CO2 reduction. ACS Catal. 8, 5240–5249 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Goodpaster, J. D., Bell, A. T. & Head-Gordon, M. Identification of possible pathways for C–C bond formation during electrochemical reduction of CO2: new theoretical insights from an improved electrochemical model. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 1471–1477 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cobley, C. M. & Xia, Y. Engineering the properties of metal nanostructures via galvanic replacement reactions. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 70, 44–62 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Clark, E. L., Hahn, C., Jaramillo, T. F. & Bell, A. T. Electrochemical CO2 reduction over compressively strained CuAg surface alloys with enhanced multi-carbon oxygenate selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 15848–15857 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Han, L., Wang, P., Liu, H., Tan, Q. & Yang, J. Balancing the galvanic replacement and reduction kinetics for the general formation of bimetallic CuM (M = Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, and Pt) hollow nanostructures. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 18354–18365 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mistry, H. et al. Highly selective plasma-activated copper catalysts for carbon dioxide reduction to ethylene. Nat. Commun. 7, 12123 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou, Y. et al. Dopant-induced electron localization drives CO2 reduction to C2 hydrocarbons. Nat. Chem. 19, 974–980 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hoang, T. T. H. et al. Nanoporous copper–silver alloys by additive-controlled electrodeposition for the selective electroreduction of CO2 to ethylene and ethanol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 5791–5797 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gunathunge, C. M. et al. Spectroscopic observation of reversible surface reconstruction of copper electrodes under CO2 reduction. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 12337–12344 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sheppard, N. & Nguyen, T. T. in Advances in Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy (eds Clark, R. J. H. & Hester, R. E.) Ch. 5 (Heyden, 1978).

  37. Gunathunge, C. M., Ovalle, V. J., Li, Y., Janik, M. J. & Waegele, M. M. Existence of an electrochemically inert CO population on Cu electrodes in alkaline pH. ACS Catal. 8, 7507–7516 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fielicke, A., Gruene, P., Meijer, G. & Rayner, D. M. The adsorption of CO on transition metal clusters: a case study of cluster surface chemistry. Surf. Sci. 603, 1427–1433 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sandberg, R. B., Montoya, J. H., Chan, K. & Nørskov, J. K. CO–CO coupling on Cu facets: coverage, strain and field effects. Surf. Sci. 654, 56–62 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Luc, W., Rosen, J. & Jiao, F. An Ir-based anode for a practical CO2 electrolyzer. Catal. Today 288, 79–84 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537–541 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rumble, J. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 99th edn (CRC Press, 2018).

  43. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comp. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H–Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Montoya, J. H., Shi, C., Chan, K. & Nørskov, J. K. Theoretical insights into a CO dimerization mechanism in CO2 electroreduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2032–2037 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada (number RGPIN-2017-06477, E.H.S.) and the Ontario Research Fund—Research Excellence Program (number ORF-RE08-034, E.H.S.). DFT calculations were performed on the Niagara supercomputer at the SciNet HPC Consortium. We acknowledge the computational resources supported by SciNet, which is funded by the University of Toronto, the Ontario Research Fund—Research Excellence Program, the Government of Ontario and the Canada Foundation for Innovation. D.S. acknowledges the NSERC E.W.R. Steacie Memorial Fellowship. Synchrotron measurements were carried out at the BL-17C at the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center. We thank R. Wolowiec and D. Kopilovic for their kind technical assistance, Ontario Centre for the Characterization of Advanced Materials (OCCAM) of the University of Toronto and the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



E.H.S. supervised the project. X.W. and E.H.S. conceived the idea. X.W. designed and carried out the experiments. P.O. carried out DFT calculations. S.-F.H. performed XAS measurements. S.-F.H. and J.A. analysed the XAS data. A.O. fabricated the IrOx-coated Ti mesh electrodes. J.T. and J.Y.H. contributed to the SEM and TEM characterization. X.W and J.S. did the TEA. K.B. and ASR carried out XPS measurements. X.W. and M.S. performed XRD measurements. C.M.G. and F.P.G.d.A. contributed to the manuscript editing. X.W., P.O., and E.H.S. co-wrote the manuscript. R.K.M., C.P.O, Z.W., A.H.I. and D.S. assisted with the discussions. All authors discussed the results and assisted during manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward H. Sargent.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

X.W. and E.H.S. have filed a provisional patent application titled ‘Manufacturing and use of co-doped multi-metallic electrocatalysts for upgrading of CO to propanol’ (application number 63/192,842). All other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Energy thanks Maximilian Fleischer, Xiaowa Nie and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–36, Tables 1–7, Note 1 and refs. 1–8.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 3

Source data for Fig. 3a–c.

Source Data Fig. 4

Source data for Fig. 4b.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Ou, P., Ozden, A. et al. Efficient electrosynthesis of n-propanol from carbon monoxide using a Ag–Ru–Cu catalyst. Nat Energy 7, 170–176 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing