Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Energy multinationals challenged by the growth of human rights

The recent ruling in a Dutch court that Shell must curb its CO2 emissions is the latest in a series of legal moves bringing human rights concerns to bear on energy activities. This trend will have profound consequences for energy developments and for meeting climate goals.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Milieudefensie. et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell C/09/571932 / HA ZA 19–379 (2021);

  2. 2.

    Hopkins, J. D. Pace L. Rev. 6, 127–132 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Davis Pluss, J. Responsible business initiative rejected at the ballot box. Swissinfo (2020).

  4. 4.

    Executive Order on Climate-Related Financial Risk (The White House, 2021);

  5. 5.

    Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v. Minister for the Environment FCA 560 (2021);

  6. 6.

    Secretary-General’s remarks at the Climate Ambition Summit. United Nations (2020).

  7. 7.

    Figueres, C. et al. Three years to safeguard our climate. Nature 546, 593–595 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Victor, D. G. et al. Prove Paris was more than paper promises. Nature 548, 25–27 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Heede, R. Carbon Majors: Updating Activity Data, Adding Entities & Calculating Emissions: A Training Manual (Climate Accountability Institute, 2019).

  10. 10.

    Stuart-Smith, R. F. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 651–655 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sovacool, B., Heffron, R. J., McCauley, D. & Goldthau, A. Nat. Energy 1, 16024 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Heffron, R. et al. J. Energy Nat. Res. Law (2021).

  13. 13.

    Nogrady, B. Landmark Australian ruling rejects coal mine over global warming. Nature (2019).

  14. 14.

    Herbling, D. Kenya cancels environment license of $2 billion coal-power plant. Bloomberg (2019).

  15. 15.

    Empty Promises Down the Line? A Human Rights Impact Assessment of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (Oxfam, Global Rights Alert, the Civic Response on Environment and Development, and the Northern Coalition on Extractives and Environment, 2020).

  16. 16.

    New Oil, Same Business? At a Crossroads to Avert Catastrophe in Uganda (International Federation for Human Rights and the Foundation for Human Rights Initiative, 2020).

  17. 17.

    ESIA EACOP Oil Development - Uganda (Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment, 2019).

  18. 18.

    Center for Food and Adequate Living Rights. et al. v. Tanzania and Uganda (2020);

  19. 19.

    Ndlovu, R. & Sguazzin, A. Biggest China bank abandons $3 billion Zimbabwe coal plan. Bloomberg (2021).

  20. 20.

    Shell confirms decision to appeal court ruling in Netherlands climate case. Shell (2020).

  21. 21.

    Hazrati, M. & Heffron, R. J. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 78, 102115 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raphael J. Heffron.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heffron, R.J. Energy multinationals challenged by the growth of human rights. Nat Energy 6, 849–851 (2021).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing