Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


Risky being green

Capacity markets are meant to ensure adequate generation capacity to avoid electricity shortages without benefitting specific technologies. Now, research shows that by minimizing investment risks over operating risks, these markets favour fossil fuels over renewable energy unless other complementary instruments are introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Mays, J., Morton, D. P. & O’Neill, R. P. Nat. Energy. (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Plozin, F., Egli, F., Steffen, B. & Schmidt, T. S. Appl. Energy 236, 1249–1268 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Weber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weber, C. Risky being green. Nat Energy 4, 906–907 (2019).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing