Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Strong-field coherent control of isolated attosecond pulse generation

Abstract

Attosecond science promises to reveal the most fundamental electronic dynamics occurring in matter and it can develop further by meeting two linked technological goals related to high-order harmonic sources: improved spectral tunability (allowing selectivity in addressing electronic transitions) and higher photon flux (permitting to measure low cross-section processes). New developments come through parametric waveform synthesis, which provides control over the shape of field transients, enabling the creation of highly-tunable isolated attosecond pulses via high-harmonic generation. Here we demonstrate that the first goal is fulfilled since central energy, spectral bandwidth/shape and temporal duration of isolated attosecond pulses can be controlled by shaping the laser waveform via two key parameters: the relative-phase between two halves of the multi-octave spanning spectrum, and the overall carrier-envelope phase. These results not only promise to expand the experimental possibilities in attosecond science, but also demonstrate coherent strong-field control of free-electron trajectories using tailored optical waveforms.

Introduction

Attosecond pulse generation via high-order harmonic generation (HHG)1,2 is undoubtedly a milestone in the development of laser technology which elucidated fundamental mechanisms in light-matter interactions3. Over the last three decades, this technological breakthrough enabled the exploration of charge dynamics occurring in atoms, molecules and solids on their natural sub-femtosecond timescales. A few examples include real-time observation of valence electron motion in atoms, electron charge migration in molecules and ionization-induced attosecond time delays4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11.

To date, attosecond pulses (isolated or pulse trains) have been generated either by means of HHG12,13,14,15 or free-electron lasers (FELs)16,17. Currently the majority of attosecond science experiments are performed with HHG-based sources due to their broad availability in university-scale laboratories. Moreover HHG-based attosecond pulses are intrinsically synchronized to the pump laser and exhibit lower intensity fluctuations than FEL-based sources.

For HHG18,19,20 in gaseous media, an intense laser field first ionizes the atoms and then coherently drives the motion of the liberated electrons. Once the electrons recombine with the parent ions, high-harmonic photons are generated up to the extreme ultraviolet (XUV) or even the soft X-ray spectral region21,22. The entire HHG process takes place within the driving laser optical cycle and repeats every half-cycle, leading to a train of high harmonic bursts each with a sub-femtosecond pulse duration. In order to isolate a single HHG event and to obtain an isolated attosecond pulse (IAP), different gating-techniques were developed23,24,25. The direct generation of IAPs by optical drivers with sub-cycle durations was more recently demonstrated26.

Despite these important achievements, contemporary attosecond sources impose considerable constraints on experiments, mainly due to the relatively low photon-flux, that prevents the observation of low cross-section processes and complicates the use of low-density samples. The low flux also results in limited spectral tunability achieved by conventional HHG sources, since the use of either a monochromator or an absorbing bandpass filter is in many cases impractical as it would further reduce the photon-flux. This negatively impacts the possibility of selectively addressing specific electronic transitions in atoms and molecules. Solving these problems will improve the applicability of HHG-based sources to a broader range of attosecond science experiments.

To significantly increase the possibility of tunability of the attosecond pulses though, a possible path lays inside the HHG process itself. The electric field-dependent nature of ionization, electron excursion, and therefore, also electron recombination enables the control of the HHG-emission characteristics via shaping of the driving optical waveform. Previous studies already suggested that specific optical waveforms can greatly enhance the HHG conversion efficiency, therefore enabling higher photon-flux27,28. The possibility of modifying the attosecond pulse central energy, spectral shape/bandwidth and pulse duration by controlling the driver waveform with sub-cycle resolution remains though experimentally unexplored.

Here we report on the generation of tunable IAPs whose spectral-temporal characteristics can be coherently controlled via parametric waveform synthesis, which allows for shaping the HHG driving optical field on a sub-cycle time scale. Differently from previous studies29, that focused on tuning the central photon-energy via macroscopic HHG parameters, such as gas pressure, gas cell position or driving pulse energy, here we concentrate on the control attainable by shaping the driving waveform. The tailored waveform with octave-spanning bandwidth is obtained via coherently merging two optical pulses from different spectral regions. The shape of the optical waveform is controlled via two synthesis parameters, the relative-phase φ (RP) among two portions of the synthesized optical spectrum (i.e., the two channels of our parametric waveform synthesizer) and the overall carrier-envelope phase ψ (CEP). By scanning the two phases, we can produce in a reproducible way a large set of waveforms and record the HHG spectra corresponding to each (φi,ψi) pair. In addition, attosecond streaking measurements were conducted for selected waveforms to reveal the temporal structure of the underlying IAPs. Simulations of the HHG process qualitatively support our key experimental findings and allow us to better understand the impact of the optical waveform on the IAP-characteristics.

Results

Tailored driver fields via parametric waveform synthesis

The optical waveforms utilized in our experiments are generated by our recently demonstrated parametric waveform synthesizer (PWS)26. The PWS is based on optical parametric amplifiers (OPAs, see Fig. 1), pumped by a cryogenic Ti:Sapphire laser amplifier, where different spectral regions of a multi-octave spanning CEP-controlled seed pulse are individually generated, amplified in three consecutive OPA-stages and coherently recombined after compression. The two spectral channels employed in this experiment, namely near-infrared (NIR) and infrared channel (IR), span the spectral regions of 650–1000 nm and 1200–2200 nm, and support pulses with full-width half-maximum (FWHM) durations of ~6 fs and ~8 fs and with pulse energy up to 0.15 mJ and 0.6 mJ respectively. The 1.7 octave-spanning waveforms can be shaped by acting on the RP φ (or relative delay) among the NIR and IR pulses and the CEP ψ of the combined pulse. The relative phase φ can be locked and controlled over a range of ~200 rad (~100 fs) with residual noise of <0.1 rad rms, where the CEP ψ can be varied over a ~10 rad range with residual noise of <0.25 rad rms. For φ = 0, where the temporal envelopes of NIR and IR pulses overlap, the FWHM duration of the synthesized waveform reaches below 3 fs, that corresponds to less than one optical cycle (sub-cycle duration). The control system that stabilizes the RP and CEP jointly with multi-beam pointing stabilization ensure stable and reproducible synthesis over many hours30.

Fig. 1: Experimental set-up.
figure 1

(On the left) Parametric waveform synthesizer, consisting of a cryogenic Ti:Sapphire pump laser (red beam), a CEP-controlled seeding front-end (olive-green), two spectral channels (NIR in green, IR in orange, shaded VIS-channel under construction) and a multi-phase meter that allows to measure the RP (φ) among the spectral channels and the CEP (ψ) of the synthesized output (orange/green). A feedback system acting on multiple delay-lines allows to stabilize and control (φ, ψ), and therefore the output waveforms. The waveforms entering the attosecond beamline (on the right) are focused into an HHG gas target. The generated HHG radiation (blue) is separated from the driving optical field via a metallic filter and refocused by an Au-coated toroidal mirror into the electron collecting volume of a Kaesdorf ETF11 electron time-of-flight spectrometer, used for attosecond streaking measurements. The spectra of the HHG emission are measured by a McPherson 251MX grating spectrometer, equipped with an Andor Newton 940 CCD camera.

Inside the attosecond beamline (Fig. 1), the synthesized pulses are split into two arms, the more intense replica drives the HHG, the other one is used as streaking-field. The pulse energy of each channel at the HHG interaction point measures 70 μJ (NIR) and 170 μJ (IR) resulting in a synthesized waveform whose most intense cycle has a half-period (distance between neighboring electric field zero crossings) ranging from 1.3 fs to 3.2 fs depending on the RP and CEP setting. Such waveforms, when focused by a spherical mirror (f = 375 mm) into a ~2 mm long gas cell, reach a maximum peak intensity (for φ = 0, ψ = 0) of 2–3 × 1015 W/cm2 in the finite HHG gas cell. These conditions apply to all experimental data presented here. Before focusing, the IR beam size is set to be two times of the NIR beam size to ensure the two beams share the same waist size at focus.

Waveform-dependent attosecond continua

To fully showcase the variety of HHG emissions that results from controlling the driving waveform, HHG spectra were recorded for a large set of waveforms, which were obtained by systematically scanning through both RP and CEP. The following measuring procedure was used: First, we concentrated on the generation of harmonics in argon and their detection in the range 30–70 eV (Fig. 2). After determining the conditions favorable for HHG (~300 mbar of pressure, gas-cell positioned a few mm after the focus), we started the waveform scanning procedure. Initially the control system moved the RP toward a given negative value (IR pulse ahead of NIR pulse). Then the CEP was scanned periodically (T = 4 s) with a linear ramp function over a range of ~10 rad. After two complete CEP scans, the RP was incremented step-wise (with 0.8 rad steps). The procedure was repeated until a certain positive value of RP (IR pulse behind NIR pulse) was reached. Once the measurement was completed, a resorting algorithm rearranged all HHG-spectra into an N × M matrix, according to the corresponding (φi, ψi) pair. The RP bin-size was chosen to be equal to its step-size during the scan. The CEP instead is a linear function and the CEP-bin size was chosen as a compromise between CEP-resolution and redundancy/completeness of the dataset. This approach allows us to obtain a complete dataset of 100 × 16 HHG-responses (RP/CEP steps) with 3–10 HHG spectra per matrix element in less than an hour (see Supplementary Information S6).

Fig. 2: Dependency of HHG spectra on RP and CEP in argon.
figure 2

The HHG process is driven in argon by the synthesized pulses and the XUV spectra are recorded with a grating XUV spectrometer. Depending on the spectral range, the spectra are dispersed by either a grating with 300 groove/mm (low photon energy) (a, c, d, g, h) or with 1200 groove/mm (high photon energy) (b, e, f, i, j). With the CEP fixed, XUV-spectra vary significantly with changing RP (a, b), where negative relative phase means the IR pulse arrives first. A CEP shift by π/2 completely changes the XUV spectra (c, e). On the other hand, XUV-spectra vary with CEP and the landscape of the CEP-dependent variation appears different when the RP is fixed at another value. (d, f, g, i and h, j) correspond to the XUV spectrum CEP-dependent variation with the RP fixed at 13.5 rad, 0.1 rad and −16.4 rad, marked with dashed line in (a, b), respectively. The integration time for each spectrum is 200 ms and a thin metallic filter is applied to block the driving laser beam (500 nm thick beryllium).

Since the resulting four-dimensional matrix (HHG photon-energy, spectral intensity, RP and CEP) cannot be visualized directly, we present, in Fig. 2, cuts through the dataset for either a fixed RP or fixed CEP value. In Fig. 2(a) and (b) it is possible to observe the rich tuning potential of the HHG spectra that can be generated by changing the RP while keeping the CEP constant. One can observe that almost all spectra are free of spectral-fringes and therefore likely correspond to IAPs (as we will verify in the next section). This result, which may seem surprising at first glance, is explained by the asymmetric and non-sinusoidal nature of the synthesized waveforms. In fact, although the waveforms can reach a sub-cycle FWHM duration only for RP-values close to 0, the superposition between the two channels leads to a single field oscillation being significantly higher than the others for a much wider range of RP values. In addition to this, there is a unique property of these extremely broadband waveforms, where each optical half-cycle exhibits a unique, non-sinusoidal field shape that is different from the preceding and subsequent ones. For example, the duration of such half-cycle can vary between 1.3 fs and 3.2 fs, greatly affecting the electron excursion time and, therefore, the probability of HHG emission. Furthermore, the exact shape of the electric field contained in a certain portion of the cycle will favor specific electron trajectories, resulting in a wide range of observed HHG spectra. The attosecond continua generated in argon span the 35–110 eV range and the highest IAP energy is measured to be ~500 pJ while the broadband IAPs energy is ~100 pJ. Narrowband continua with different photon-energies can be found, for instance for φ = −28 rad (~5 eV bandwidth peaked at 42 eV) or φ = −16 rad (~15 eV bandwidth peaked at 60 eV), as well as broadband continua such as the one around φ = 0 rad (spanning 1.5 octaves, from ~36 eV to ~101 eV, peaked at 75 eV). Interestingly the highest cut-off energy, occurring around φ = 0 rad, does not coincides with the highest yield region, that instead appears around φ = −5 rad, suggesting that the additional control obtained by shaping the waveform may also help improving HHG conversion efficiency beyond what is possible by pure pulse compression.

When changing the CEP by π/2, the landscape of the RP-dependent XUV-continua changes completely as shown in Fig. 2(c) and (e), where for instance the HHG yield greatly reduces around φ = 0 when compared to Fig. 2(a, b). In Fig. 2(d, f), (g, i) and (h, j) instead we plot the CEP dependency for three different RP values. For all three RP values we observe the typical CEP dependency of HHG continua in the cut-off region, but here extended to the entire observed spectral range. This verifies that IAPs can be generated over broad spectral ranges without the need for additional gating techniques, such as double optical gating23 or by filtering the cut-off emission31 (amplitude gating), but shaped solely by choosing an appropriate optical waveform. Moreover, it is interesting to notice how the three continua evolve differently when changing the CEP: in (d,f) the overall intensity drops without a significant change in spectral shape; in (g,i) instead the change in CEP is accompanied by a central photon-energy shift; finally in (h,j) the central energy does not vary considerably but the spectrum broadens and forms a double-hump structure. These observations suggest the vastness of the possibilities introduced by electron trajectory coherent control via waveform synthesis.

We repeated a similar RP and CEP scan in neon to reach higher photon energies. All the macroscopic parameters stayed the same as in the previous case, including the gas pressure (~300 mbar), only the gas target position was optimized (moved closer to the laser focus). Remarkably, the neon HHG was sufficiently intense to be properly detected without increasing the integration time of the spectrometer when compared to the argon case (200 ms).

Figure 3 shows that the tunability of attosecond continua can be extended into the soft-X ray region up to ~200 eV in neon. Controlling the RP (see Fig. 3(a)) allows once more to tune the central photon-energy and the bandwidth, as highlighted in Fig. 3(c) where three exemplary spectra are extracted from Fig. 3(a) and are centred at 120 eV, 145 eV and 170 eV respectively. In Fig. 3(c), several exemplary spectra of HHG in argon (dashed line) are also shown, joining the neon HHG spectra, to showcase the wide tuning range of the generated HHG continua. The CEP dependency shown in Fig. 3(b) supports that the continua observed here corresponds to IAPs as well.

Fig. 3: Dependency of HHG spectra on RP and CEP in neon.
figure 3

The XUV spectrum is dispersed with a 1200 groove/mm grating. With the CEP fixed, XUV spectra vary by changing the RP in (a). CEP-dependent XUV spectra at fixed RP = 0.7 rad, marked with a black line in (a), is shown in (b). Four spectra of HHG in argon (dashed, from Fig. 2) and three spectra of HHG in neon (solid) are presented to showcase the spectral tuning range (c). The integration time for each neon HHG spectrum is 200 ms and a Zr filter (300 nm) is used to block the driving laser beam.

The waveform control demonstrated here allows generating attosecond continua with tunable central energy and bandwidth over an impressive 30–200 eV range simply replacing the gas type and optimizing the gas target position without modifying any other macroscopic HHG parameters.

Tunable isolated attosecond pulse characterization

So far, we have characterized the spectral magnitude of the attosecond continua, but to gain insights on the temporal profile of the IAPs it is necessary to perform attosecond streaking measurements. Here, the HHG beam overlaps with the optical laser pulse at a gas target and the momenta of the HHG-ionized photoelectrons are modulated by the optical streaking field. The photoelectron spectrogram is acquired by varying the delay between the optical streaking field and the HHG pulses. By feeding the measured spectrogram to an iterative phase-retrieving algorithm, the spectrotemporal information of HHG radiation and of the streaking field can be obtained.

Given the complexity of our streaking waveforms and the broad bandwidth of the generated attosecond continua, we decided to use the Volkov Transform Generalized Projection Algorithm (VTGPA)32 for the pulse retrieval. VTGPA has advantages over conventional attosecond pulse reconstruction methods33,34,35 as it does not rely on the central-momentum approximation, therefore allowing us to precisely retrieve broadband XUV spectra, and it has better immunity to detection noise. Moreover, the VTGPA code is ideal for achieving a correct retrieval in the presence of complex streaking waveforms since it is less restrictive on the intensity and bandwidth of the streaking field. For the sake of experimental repeatability and statistics, we repeated the acquisition of each streaking trace several times. As a result, the data-acquisition of a few different streaking traces with systematically scanned synthesized waveforms could take up to two hours. It is only feasible to conduct such extensive characterization for a few selected cases, as shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4: Isolated attosecond pulses characterized via attosecond streaking.
figure 4

The photoelectron spectrograms (ad)(i) are obtained with HHG from argon (a, b) and neon (c, d). The VTGPA reconstructed traces (ad)(ii) are shown along with the experimental traces (ad) (i). The retrieved temporal profiles (red) and temporal phase (blue) of the IAPs are shown in (ad)(iii). The retrieved and the Fourier transform limited (FTL, bracket) pulse duration are both stated (iii). The retrieved XUV spectrum (red) and spectral phase (blue) are shown in (ad)(iv). The independently measured XUV spectra (black) (with grating XUV spectrometer) are also shown for each case (iv) to compare with the retrieved ones.

All attosecond streaking retrievals confirm that the observed HHG continua indeed correspond to IAPs. Moreover, these measurements show that the demonstrated tunability extends also to the attosecond pulse duration. In the argon case, the IAP in Fig. 4a(iii) shows a duration of 240 as, while the IAP in Fig. 4b(iii) only 80 as. This control over the IAP duration also applies to the case of neon, where different (φi,ψi) pairs lead to different continua bandwidths, and the attosecond pulse duration decreases from 140 as to 80 as. Here it is worth noticing that the measured photoelectron spectrograms a–d(i) and the reconstructed ones a–d(ii) not only match each other well, but are also in substantial agreement with the independently measured XUV spectra, demonstrating the fidelity of our measurements. These measurements showcase that, by shaping the HHG-driving waveform, we can not only control the spectral properties of the IAPs, but also gain control on their pulse durations. This represents a significant advance in attosecond source technology, since different gating techniques can either deliver narrowband or broadband IAPs, but do not allow to easily switch between them36.

HHG simulations with tailored waveforms

Attosecond pulse generation driven by complex waveforms was also investigated theoretically by means of classical trajectory analysis and quantum single-atom response simulations. We started by calculating the HHG obtained during a RP-scan (with fixed CEP) similar to the experimental RP-scan shown in Fig. 2. In the calculations we started with the individual NIR and IR pulses of our PWS characterized via two-dimensional shearing spectral interferometry (2DSI37, see Supplementary Information S1). Then we calculated the overall synthesized field for RP values between −11 rad and 11 rad. Finally, we use these waveforms as HHG driving field in a single-atom response simulation (based on HHGMax38, see Fig. 5a). Despite the quantitative differences observed between experiment and simulation results, the main features observed experimentally are reproduced by the simulation. In particular, we observe the overall asymmetry of the RP-scan (RP > 0 vs. <0) as well as the periodic appearance of bright HHG-continua alternating with low-yield regions. For certain RP values the continua appear to be broadband (close to φ = 0, where the envelope peak of the NIR and IR pulses overlap) while for other values narrowband (φ = −6.8 rad) or with intermediate bandwidth (φ = 5.7 rad). Moreover, the HHG spectra exhibit spectral-fringes only for few RP values and the fringes are located in the low photon-energy region, similar to the experimentally observed ones.

Fig. 5: HHG single-atom response simulations for argon.
figure 5

a Dependence of XUV spectrum on RP between the NIR and IR channels, using a common CEP fixed at π/2. The Lewenstein integral20 considers short trajectories only and is solved using synthesized driving fields EL(t) built upon the combination of the actual NIR and IR channel temporal profiles of the PWS. The synthesized peak intensity was fixed to 2.5 × 1014W/cm2 for RP = 0 and CEP = 0. Linear 1D propagation of the resulting single-atom XUV pulse through the gas target (2 mm, 300 mbar) is implemented. b Lineouts of the XUV spectra at different RP values (corresponding to red, blue and black vertical lines in a) and their corresponding FTL pulse durations. ce classical electron trajectories (purple) and emitted XUV attosecond bursts (shaded areas) are shown for different optical waveforms (black solid lines) resulting from the RP values indicated in (a). The trajectory color-coding is based on the re-collision energy and the transparency level is based on the ionization rate at the trajectory birth time (see Supplementary Information S5).

We then analyze the three particular waveforms corresponding to these continua, one leading to a narrowband continuum (Fig. 5c), one to a broadband one (Fig. 5d) and the third to an intermediate bandwidth (Fig. 5e). In the first case the half-cycle peaked at t = −2 fs is by far the most intense one and therefore the only significant contributor to strong-field ionization. The following half-cycle is weaker and the accelerated electrons only gain a moderate amount of energy, leading to narrowband IAPs with low photon-energy and a duration of 278 as, when accounting for the dispersion due to the 2 mm thick, 300 mbar, neutral gas column. The IAP spectrum and duration are in relatively good agreement with the narrowband IAP presented in Fig. 4a(iii). The second waveform instead leads to a broadband emission. Here an intense half-cycle peaked at t = −1 fs ionizes a certain fraction of the atoms. The electrons are then accelerated by the following half-cycle, in this case more intense than the preceding one. As underlined by the classical trajectory analysis, these electrons, depending on their precise ionization time, gain significant momentum leading to a broadband emission that extends to higher photon-energies than in the previous case. Given that the accelerating half-cycle also leads to a significant strong-field ionization, one would expect the appearance of a second attosecond pulse. Interestingly however, the following half-cycle (peaked at t = 4.7 fs) has a significantly longer period and lower field amplitude, which may dramatically reduce the emission probability. This reduction in emission probability leads to the suppression of the second attosecond pulse and, therefore, to the appearance of a well-isolated broadband attosecond pulse with a duration of 112 as. For the third waveform, which falls between the two previous cases, the cycle that provides the dominant contribution to the HHG arrives after t = 0. Electrons contributing to HHG originate mainly from the half-cycle peaked at t = 2 fs, since the half-cycle just before t = 0 is too weak to significantly ionize the atoms. The field strength of the accelerating sub-cycle is intermediate, which leads to a less extended cut-off energy.

These simulations, though far from being exhaustive, allow us to shed light on some of the fundamental mechanisms, which allow us to generate tunable IAPs by controlling the optical waveform via the pulse synthesis parameters.

Discussion

We have experimentally demonstrated that the spectrotemporal characteristics of IAPs can be controlled in myriad ways by shaping the sub-cycle features of the broadband HHG driving pulses. The capability to shape the waveform was achieved by adjusting both the RP among two halves of the optical spectrum and the total CEP of the synthesized field. For the similar macroscopic HHG-conditions, we generate continua across the 30–110 eV range in argon and extend it up to 200 eV in neon. The bandwidth and duration of the generated attosecond pulses are substantially varied solely by changing the RP and CEP settings. This unprecedented spectral tunability for an attosecond source is achieved without the use of any additional gating or spectral filtering technique. HHG simulations help elucidate some of the underling physical mechanisms, unambiguously linking the IAP tunability with the shape of the HHG-driving waveform. We believe that parametric waveform control will allow attosecond light sources to leap into a new era of development, with enormous benefits for attosecond science experiments.

The strong-field coherent control experiments presented here offer a glimpse of upcoming technologies enabled by waveform-controlled light-matter interactions.

Data and code availability

The experimental data and computer codes used in this paper are available at https://zenodo.org/record/5564933.

References

  1. McPherson, A. et al. Studies of multiphoton production of vacuum-ultraviolet radiation in the rare gases. JOSA B 4, 595–601 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferray, M. et al. Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Optical Phys. 21, L31 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Krausz, F. & Ivanov, M. Attosecond physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 163 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Drescher, M. et al. Time-resolved atomic inner-shell spectroscopy. Nature 419, 803–807 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goulielmakis, E. et al. Real-time observation of valence electron motion. Nature 466, 739–743 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kraus, P. M. et al. Measurement and laser control of attosecond charge migration in ionized iodoacetylene. Science 350, 790–795 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Calegari, F. et al. Ultrafast electron dynamics in phenylalanine initiated by attosecond pulses. Science 346, 336–339 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wirth, A. et al. Synthesized light transients. Science 334, 195–200 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Calegari, F., Sansone, G., Stagira, S., Vozzi, C. & Nisoli, M. Advances in attosecond science. J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Optical Phys. 49, 062001 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nisoli, M., Decleva, P., Calegari, F., Palacios, A. & Martín, F. Attosecond electron dynamics in molecules. Chem. Rev. 117, 10760–10825 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schultze, M. et al. Controlling dielectrics with the electric field of light. Nature 493, 75–78 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sansone, G. et al. Isolated single-cycle attosecond pulses. Science 314, 443–446 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghimire, S. & Reis, D. A. High-harmonic generation from solids. Nat. Phys. 15, 10–16 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luu, T. T. et al. Extreme–ultraviolet high–harmonic generation in liquids. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–10 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, M.-C. et al. Generation of bright isolated attosecond soft x-ray pulses driven by multicycle midinfrared lasers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, E2361–E2367 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duris, J. et al. Tunable isolated attosecond x-ray pulses with gigawatt peak power from a free-electron laser. Nat. Photon. 14, 30–36 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maroju, P. K. et al. Attosecond pulse shaping using a seeded free-electron laser. Nature 578, 386–391 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuchiev, M. Y. Atomic antenna. JETP Lett. 45, 404–406 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Corkum, P. B. Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lewenstein, M., Balcou, P., Ivanov, M. Y., L’Huillier, A. & Corkum, P. B. Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields. Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang, Z., Rundquist, A., Wang, H., Murnane, M. M. & Kapteyn, H. C. Generation of coherent soft x rays at 2.7 nm using high harmonics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2967 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Popmintchev, T. et al. Bright coherent ultrahigh harmonics in the kev x-ray regime from mid-infrared femtosecond lasers. Science 336, 1287–1291 (2012).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang, Z. Controlling attosecond pulse generation with a double optical gating. Phys. Rev. A 76, 051403 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Abel, M. J. et al. Isolated attosecond pulses from ionization gating of high-harmonic emission. Chem. Phys. 366, 9–14 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hammond, T., Brown, G. G., Kim, K. T., Villeneuve, D. & Corkum, P. Attosecond pulses measured from the attosecond lighthouse. Nat. Photon. 10, 171–175 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rossi, G. M. et al. Sub-cycle millijoule-level parametric waveform synthesizer for attosecond science. Nat. Photon. 14, 629–635 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chipperfield, L., Robinson, J., Tisch, J. & Marangos, J. Ideal waveform to generate the maximum possible electron recollision energy for any given oscillation period. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 063003 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jin, C., Wang, G., Wei, H., Le, A.-T. & Lin, C. Waveforms for optimal sub-kev high-order harmonics with synthesized two-or three-colour laser fields. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–6 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Timmers, H. et al. Polarization-assisted amplitude gating as a route to tunable, high-contrast attosecond pulses. Optica 3, 707–710 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Silva-Toledo, M. A. et al. Waveform reproducibility from an opa-based parallel synthesizer. In High Intensity Lasers and High Field Phenomena, HF1B–5 (Optical Society of America, 2020).

  31. Goulielmakis, E. et al. Single-cycle nonlinear optics. Science 320, 1614–1617 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Keathley, P. D., Bhardwaj, S., Moses, J., Laurent, G. & Kaertner, F. X. Volkov transform generalized projection algorithm for attosecond pulse characterization. N. J. Phys. 18, 073009 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mairesse, Y. & Quéré, F. Frequency-resolved optical gating for complete reconstruction of attosecond bursts. Phys. Rev. A 71, 011401 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chini, M., Gilbertson, S., Khan, S. D. & Chang, Z. Characterizing ultrabroadband attosecond lasers. Opt. Express 18, 13006–13016 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Laurent, G., Cao, W., Ben-Itzhak, I. & Cocke, C. L. Attosecond pulse characterization. Opt. Express 21, 16914–16927 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chini, M., Zhao, K. & Chang, Z. The generation, characterization and applications of broadband isolated attosecond pulses. Nat. Photonics 8, 178–186 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Birge, J. R., Ell, R. & Kärtner, F. X. Two-dimensional spectral shearing interferometry for few-cycle pulse characterization. Opt. Lett. 31, 2063–2065 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoegner, M. https://github.com/Leberwurscht/HHGmax. (accessed on 3 Feb. 2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge support from Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY), a Center of the Helmholtz Association, the Cluster of Excellence ‘CUI: Advanced Imaging of Matter’ of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - EXC 2056 - project ID 390715994, the priority programme ‘Quantum Dynamics in Tailored Intense Fields’ (QUTIF) of the DFG (SPP1840 SOLSTICE) and the PIER Hamburg-MIT Program. We thank A. Trabattoni for many valuable discussions and O.D. Mücke for initial work on the PWS. P.D. acknowledges support by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) Grant under Contract No. FA9550-19-1-0065.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.Y. designed and implemented the attosecond beamline. G.M.R. and R.E.M. designed and built the opto-mechanical set-up and its waveform stabilization/control infrastructure. Y.Y., R.E.M., G.M.R., F.S. and M.A.S.-T. conducted the experiments. F.S. and M.A.S.-T. carried out the data processing and its analysis jointly with R.E.M. and P.D.K. The numerical simulations were performed by M.A.S.-T. The original idea of the experiment was conceived by Y.Y., R.E.M., G.M.R. and F.X.K. Y.Y., R.E.M. and G.M.R. co-wrote the paper with contributions from all authors. The project was supervised by G.C. and F.X.K.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franz X. Kärtner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Mainz, R.E., Rossi, G.M. et al. Strong-field coherent control of isolated attosecond pulse generation. Nat Commun 12, 6641 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26772-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26772-0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing