Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Variations in provision of psychological care to hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: results of a national survey of UK transplant centers

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Structure of psychological support services for patients and staff.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, RN, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Jenkins PL, Linington A, Whittaker JA. A retrospective study of psychosocial morbidity in bone marrow transplant recipients. Psychosomatics. 1991;32:65–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker F, Marcellus D, Zabora J, Polland A, Jodrey D. Psychological distress among adult patients being evaluated for bone marrow transplantation. Psychosomatics. 1997;38:10–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuba K, Esser P, Mehnert A, Johansen C, Schwinn A, Schirmer L, et al. Depression and anxiety following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective population-based study in Germany. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52:1651–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoodin F, Uberti JP, Lynch TJ, Steele P, Ratanatharathorn V. Do negative or positive emotions differentially impact mortality after adult stem cell transplant? Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;38:255–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horne B, Gilleece M, Jackson G, Snowden JA, Liebersbach S, Velikova G, et al. Psychosocial supportive care services for haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients, a service evaluation of three UK transplant centres. Eur J Cancer Care. 2014;23:349–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. FACT-JACIE Hematopoietic cellular therapy accreditation manual sixth edition Version 6.1, 2017.

  7. Majhail NS, Rizzo D, Lee SJ, Aljurf M, Atsuta Y, Bonfim C, et al. Recommended screening and preventive practices for longterm survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012;47:337–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Polomeni A, Moreno E, Schulz-Kinderman F. Psychological morbidity and support. In: Carreras E, Dufour C, Mohty M, Kröger N (eds). The EBMT Handbook. Springer Open, Open access publication, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02278-5

  9. National Institute for Clinical Excellence 2004, Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer (Cancer service guideline 4). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/csg4.

  10. Niazi SK, Spaulding A, Vargas E, Schneekloth T, Crook J, Rummans T, et al. Mental health and chemical dependency services at US transplant centers. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:1152–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McFarland D, Gorman E, Kim S, Rothwell A, Saunders P, Tindle S, et al. Psychiatric evaluations prior to stem cell transplant—a survey of National Marrow Donor Programs. Psycho-Oncology. 2016;25:877–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Randall J, Anderson G, Kayser K Psychosocial assessment of candidates for hematopoietic transplantation: a national survey of centers’ practices. Psycho-Oncology. 2022; 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5919. online ahead of print.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Alex King, Consultant Clinical Psychologist at Imperial College London NHS trust for his contribution to the design of the survey tool. We also thank all psychological practitioners, nurses, and doctors who participated in the survey. Dr. Joseph Low’s post was supported by the Marie Curie core and program grant funding (grants MCCC-FCO-16-U and MCCC-FPO-16-U).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RN was responsible for the conception and design of the study, literature review, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, drafting the manuscript, and revision of the manuscript. CA was responsible for the conception, design and supervision of the study, and critical revision of the manuscript. JL, RD, and AM were responsible for supervision of the study and critical revision of the manuscript. MR contributed to the design of the survey tool, data collection, data analysis, and critical revision of the manuscript. HL contributed to the design of the survey tool, data collection, and critical revision of the manuscript. J Lee contributed to data collection and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosalina Naidoo.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naidoo, R., Low, J., Rennoldson, M. et al. Variations in provision of psychological care to hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: results of a national survey of UK transplant centers. Bone Marrow Transplant (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01735-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-022-01735-1

Search

Quick links