Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ulcer

Prediction and prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding

Algorithms can predict the risk of rebleeding and mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, but not the risk of rebleeding following endoscopic treatment in patients with ulcers. A recent meta-analysis has addressed this issue, and could facilitate the development of methods to predict rebleeding and endoscopic treatments to reduce rebleeding.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Savides, T. S. & Jensen, D. M. in Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Pathophysiology/Diagnosis/Management 8th edn (eds Feldman, M., Friedman, L. S. & Brandt, L. J.) 285–322 (Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Sung, J. J. et al. Intravenous esomeprazole for prevention of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 150, 455–464 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. García-Iglesias, P. et al. Meta-analysis: predictors of rebleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcer. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 34, 888–900 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rockall, T. A., Logan, R. F., Devlin, H. B. & Northfield, T. C. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 38, 316–321 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rockall, T. A., Logan, R. F., Devlin, H. B. & Northfield, T. C. Selection of patients for early discharge or outpatient care after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage. Lancet 347, 1138–1140 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blatchford, O., Murray, W. R. & Blatchford, M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 356, 1318–1321 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barkun, A. N. et al. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann. Intern. Med. 152, 101–113 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen, D. M. et al. Doppler ultrasound probe (DUP) as a guide to endoscopic hemostasis of ulcers with stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) [abstract 347m]. Gastrointest. Endosc. 71, AB113 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong, R. C. Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: probing beneath the surface. Gastroenterology 137, 1897–1902 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D. M. Jensen has received grants from AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Olympus, Pentax and US Endoscopy. He has been a consultant for AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific and US Endoscopy, and a speaker for Boston Scientific.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, D. Prediction and prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9, 7–8 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2011.243

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2011.243

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing